Search

Many patients with hematologic malignancies receive RBC transfusion support, which often causes systemic and tissue iron toxicity. Because of their compromised bone marrow function, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are especially vulnerable to excess iron levels. Iron toxicity may compromise transplant engraftment and eventually promote relapse by mediating oxidative and genotoxic stress in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and further impairing the already dysfunctional bone marrow microenvironment in HSCT recipients. Iron toxicity is thought to be primarily mediated by its ability to induce reactive oxygen species and trigger inflammation. Elevated iron levels in the bone marrow can decrease the number of HSCs and progenitor cells, as well as their clonogenic potential, alter mesenchymal stem cell differentiation, and inhibit the expression of chemokines and adhesion molecules involved in hematopoiesis. In vivo, in vitro, and clinical studies support the concept that iron chelation therapy may limit iron toxicity in the bone marrow and promote hematologic improvement and engraftment in HSCT recipients. This review will provide an overview of the current knowledge of the detrimental impact of iron toxicity in the setting of HSCT in patients with hematologic malignancies and the use of iron restriction approaches to improve transplant outcome., (Copyright © 2021 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The optimal stem cell (SC) mobilization strategy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains a matter of debate. Possible approaches include low or high doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy), other chemotherapeutic agents, or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. The scope of the study was to compare low-dose Cy plus G-CSF versus intermediate-high-dose Cy plus G-CSF versus G-CSF alone for SC mobilization in MM, in terms of efficacy and safety. We retrospectively analyzed 422 MM patients undergoing SC mobilization in 6 Italian centers, including 188 patients who received low-dose Cy (LD-Cy group, defined as 2 g/m 2 ), 163 patients who received intermediate-high-dose Cy (HD-Cy group, defined as ≥ 3 g/m 2 ), and 71 patients who received G-CSF alone (G-CSF group). The median peak of circulating CD34+ cells was 77/µL in the LD-Cy group, 92/µL in the HD-Cy group, and 55/µL in the G-CSF group (P = .0001). The median amount of SCs collected was 9.1 × 10 6 /kg, 9.7 × 10 6 /kg, and 5.6 × 10 6 /kg in the 3 groups, respectively (P = .0001). The rate of mobilization failure (defined as failure to collect ≥2 × 10 6 /kg) was 3.7% in the LD-Cy group, 3.4% in the HD-Cy group, and 4.3% in the G-CSF group (P = .9). The target SC dose of at least 4 × 10 6 /kg was reached in 90.4%, 91.1%, and 78.6% of the patients in these 3 groups, respectively (P = .014). The "on demand" use of plerixafor was higher in the G-CSF group (76%) compared with the LD-Cy group (19%) and the HD-Cy group (6%). In multivariate analysis, G-CSF mobilization and previous use of melphalan or radiotherapy were independently associated with failure to collect the target SC dose of ≥4 × 10 6 /kg. No impacts of age, blood counts, or previous treatment with lenalidomide, bortezomib, or carfilzomib were observed. Our results suggest that LD-Cy may be considered for successful SC mobilization in patients with MM., (Copyright © 2020 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)