Search

Exposure to ionizing radiation is an inherent occupational health hazard in clinical cardiology. Health risks have been reported previously, including predilection to cancer. In addition, orthopedic injury due to prolonged wearing of heavy protective lead aprons, which are mandatory to reduce radiation risk, have been extensively documented. Cardiology as a specialty has grown with rising volumes of increasingly complex procedures. This includes electrophysiological, coronary, and structural intervention, advanced heart failure/transplant management, and diagnostic imaging. Both the operator as well imaging specialists are exposed to radiation, particularly in structural interventions where interventional cardiologists and structural imagers work closely. Increasingly, women interested in cardiology may deselect the field due to radiation concerns. This expert document highlights the risks of radiation exposure in cardiology, including practical tips within various subspecialty fields such as interventional/structural cardiology, electrophysiology, imaging, advanced heart failure, and pediatric cardiology., Competing Interests: Dr Zieroth has received research grant support, served on advisory boards for, or speaker engagements with AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Servier, and Vifor Pharma; and serves on a clinical trial committee or as a national lead for studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Novartis and Pfizer. Nonindustray support was received by Canadian Medical and Surgical KT Group, CCS, CHFS, Charite, EOCI, Liv, Medscape, Ology, PHRI, PACE-CME, Radcliffe, Translational Medicine Academy. Dr Dalal is a speaker for Medtronic. Dr Razminia is related to Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Several international registries have examined outcomes in women undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, none of these studies included women from the Gulf region. The Women IN Gulf Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (WIN Gulf TAVR) registry aimed to examine sex-based differences in patient characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR in the region., Methods: This registry is a prespecified subanalysis of the main Gulf TAVR registry. Baseline characteristics, procedural details and success, and 1-year outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome consisted of a composite of all causes of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and rehospitalizations at 1 year. The secondary outcomes were a composite of the individual components of the primary composite., Results: A total of 347 women (44% of the Gulf TAVR registry) were included in the final analysis, with a mean age of 74.1 ± 9.1 years; mean ejection fraction of 56.20% ± 10.52%; and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 5.30 ± 4.35. The composite primary end point occurred in 12.4% (95% CI, 9.3-16.2). The individual components of the primary end point were as follows: death, 4.3% (95% CI, 2.6-7.0); MI, 1.1% (95% CI, 0.4-2.9); and rehospitalization, 9.8% (95% CI, 7.1-13.3), with 7.2% (95% CI, 4.9-10.4) related to cardiac causes., Conclusions: Women in the WIN Gulf TAVR registry had outcomes and baseline characteristics similar to men. Although higher rehospitalizations for cardiac causes and MI at 1 year in women were noted, the overall survival was better in women. These observations warrant a larger cohort to identify the drivers of events., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice are intended to help health care providers and patients make decisions, minimize inappropriate practice variation, promote effective resource use, improve clinical outcomes, and direct future research. SCAI has been engaged in the creation and dissemination of clinical guidance documents since the 1990s. These documents are a cornerstone of the Society's education, advocacy, and quality improvement initiatives. The Publications Committee is charged with the oversight of SCAI's clinical documents program and has published the first iteration of this manual of standard operating procedures in 2019 to ensure consistency, methodological rigor, and transparency in the development and endorsement of the Society's documents. The manual has been updated based on feedback from the implementation of the original version to add specificity and expand the breadth of available document formats. The manual is intended for reference by the Publications Committee, document writing groups, external collaborators, SCAI representatives, peer reviewers, and anyone seeking information about the SCAI documents program., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Foundation.)