Search

This narrative review manuscript aims to raise the difficulties and opportunities for patient safety in specialised healthcare training considering undergraduate, postgraduate, specialist and continuing education, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also suggests some proposals for carrying it out. It very briefly discusses this specific training and its current situation in primary care. Highlighting that patient safety is a need, an area of competence and a training opportunity for residents. It establishes the general framework of patient safety in primary care in the document "7 steps for Patient Safety in Primary Care", stating the need for a systemic approach. It highlights the elaboration and presentation of cases on clinical errors as the most frequent training strategy. The real-life clinical scenarios relate to difficult patients, critical incidents and bioethics issues in professional practice. These scenarios have as common characteristics, the fact to produce difficulties and suffering for all the actors involved. Several instruments for training in patient safety are also included. The medium-term goal is to consolidate clinical safety in specialised healthcare training. Finally, an analysis is made of the impact of the pandemic on patient safety training, particularly on specialised healthcare training and some proposals are recommended on how to carry out safe teaching in the times of the COVID-19 pandemic., (Copyright © 2021. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Objective: To evaluate the performance and quality of the 10 groups of training tasks envisaged in the portfolio training model undertaken by all residents of the Primary Care Teaching Unit in Murcia., Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted on the portfolios provided and completed by all residents in May 2011., Participants: All residents who were in training at that time (131)., Method: Ten groups of training tasks were established from those recommended by the National Commission for the specialty. The performance of each one in each of the portfolios was evaluated, and the compliance for each training task was calculated. The quality of the performance of each of the tasks was given a score, 0 points (very poor) to 10 points (excellent)., Results: As regards compliance, the tasks that were most performed were: filling in the Resident book correctly and using the resident skills guide, both with 99.24%, followed by reflection reports on the training visits. All tasks had a compliance rate higher than 67%. The mean percentage of compliance was 86.49%. All tasks obtained an average score greater than 7 (outstanding). The overall mean score was 7,8 points., Conclusions: The level of perfomance of the tasks set out in the portfolio by the residents was very satisfying. It is necessary to continue working on improving the performance of the portfolio., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)