Search

Objective: Validation of a questionnaire designed to stratify the level of digital competence in chronic patients., Method: Cross-sectional study, carried out in the Endocrinology and Nutrition Section of the Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León (CAULE). We selected the digital competencies section of the Cambados questionnaire, designed for the identification of digital chronic patient, with a maximum score of 20 points. The questionnaire was completed for validation by patients for whom were prescribed a digital tool for glycemic control. Reliability was assessed by assessing the correct use of the prescribed tool and internal consistency., Results: The questionnaire was completely filled in by 171 patients, with a mean age of 44.36 (SD 17.36). The mean score obtained in the questionnaire was 11.04 (SD 4.74) and a score over 12 was the most appropriate cut-off point to discriminate between patients according to their level of digital competence. 48.54% of the patients made adequate use of the tool. The scale showed good internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.77., Conclusions: The results reached in the present study allow us to affirm that the responses obtained from the patients in the digital competency definition questionnaire are a good indicator of the use of digital tools., (Copyright © 2022 FECA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: The expansion of intensive care areas has been one of the most significant measures in this forced adaptation to the evolution of the different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective is to evaluate the deployment of contingency plans in the care of patients admitted to intensive care units during the period from March 19 to April 20, 2020, in a public hospital, reference for 300,000 inhabitants belonging to the Galician Health Service., Materials and Methods: Qualitative research from focus groups, with systematic sampling. Based on the adaptation to the health environment of the 10 measures recommended by Deloitte to face a pandemic, an evaluation was carried out by the quality unit of the Health Area. As outcome indicators, the number of COVID-19 patients, % of patients admitted to hospital, % patients admitted to intensive care units, as well as the number of deaths from COVID-19, were evaluated in seven health areas in the period March 19 to April 20, 2020., Results: The qualitative evaluation identified 2 areas for improvement (communication and risk assessment) of the 10 recommended measures. The Health Area has the lowest relative (2.6%) and absolute (16) rate of deceased patients, as well as the lowest relative (7.9%) and absolute (24) rate of patients admitted to intensive services for COVID-19. The infection rate in professionals has been 4.4%., Conclusions: The simplicity and identification of areas for improvement added to the low consumption of resources are strengths of this proposal. This self-assessment can be helpful in identifying areas for improvement., (Copyright © 2022 FECA. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

This position paper describes the most relevant and essential aspects of a comprehensive, multidimensional assessment of hospitalized elderly people. The change in demographic patterns and the epidemiological profiles of diseases makes it necessary for internal medicine departments to adapt in order to take into account the vulnerabilities of the elderly in this context. A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment and the multidisciplinary development of a care plan during hospitalization can have an impact in terms of preventing mortality, disability, and institutionalization at discharge. It is necessary for all internists to acquire skills to improve the hospitalization experience in the elderly and obtain better health outcomes in our patients. This document has been developed by the Focus Group on Aging and the Polypathological and Advanced Age Working Group and endorsed by the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (SEMI). All rights reserved.)