Search

Purpose: Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has emerged as a promising method for managing complex benign lesions that would otherwise require major colonic resection. The aim of this study was to describe the different techniques and to evaluate the safety of CELS, assess its outcomes in a technique that is scarcely widespread in our environment., Method: Observational retrospective study, short-term outcomes of patients undergoing CELS for benign colon polyps from October 2018 to June 2020 were evaluated. Postoperative outcomes, length of hospital stay and pathological findings were evaluated., Results: Seventeen consecutive patients underwent CELS during the study period. The median size of the lesion was 3.5 cm (range 2.5-6.5 cm), the most frequent location was the cecum (10 from 17). Most patients treated with CELS underwent an endoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (11 from 17). In four patients this resection was combined with another CELS technique, and two patients underwent an endoscopic-assisted laparoscopic segment resection. The success rate of CELS in our series was in 14 from 17 (82.4%). The median operative time was 85 min (range 50-225 min). The median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-15 days). One patient experienced an organ/space surgical site infection which did not require further intervention. Four lesions were shown to be malignant by postoperative pathology study., Conclusion: CELS is a safe and multidisciplinar technique that requires collaboration between gastroenterologists and surgeons. It can be considered as an alternative to colonic resection for complex benign colonic polyps., (Copyright © 2020 AEC. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has emerged as a promising method for managing complex benign lesions that would otherwise require major colonic resection. The aim of this study was to describe the different techniques and to evaluate the safety of CELS, assess its outcomes in a technique that is scarcely widespread in our environment., Method: Observational retrospective study, short-term outcomes of patients undergoing CELS for benign colon polyps from October 2018 to June 2020 were evaluated. Postoperative outcomes, length of hospital stay and pathological findings were evaluated., Results: Seventeen consecutive patients underwent CELS during the study period. The median size of the lesion was 3.5 cm (range 2.5 - 6.5 cm), the most frequent location was the cecum (10 from 17). Most patients treated with CELS underwent an endoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (11 from 17). In four patients this resection was combined with another CELS technique, and two patients underwent an endoscopic-assisted laparoscopic segment resection. The success rate of CELS in our series was in 14 from 17 (82,4%). The median operative time was 85 min (range 50-225 min). The median hospital stay was 2 days (range 1-15 days). One patient experienced an organ/space surgical site infection which did not require further intervention. Four lesions were shown to be malignant by postoperative pathology study., Conclusion: CELS is a safe and multidisciplinar technique that requires collaboration between gastroenterologists and surgeons. It can be considered as an alternative to colonic resection for complex benign colonic polyps., (Copyright © 2020 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Frailty is associated with greater postoperative morbidity and mortality. Individualized multidisciplinary management of these patients can improve the quality of care. The objectives of this study are to determine the percentage of frail patients with colorectal cancer in our population, and to describe the morbidity and mortality associated with surgery and the evolution of palliative treatment., Methods: A prospective, observational study of patients with surgical colorectal cancer (February 1, 2018-April 30, 2019). Frail patients were screened and classified according to degrees of frailty. Therapeutic decision-making (surgery or palliative treatment) was determined by the degree of fragility and explicit will of the patient. Postoperative comorbidities were analyzed (according to Clavien-Dindo and Comprehensive Complication Index), as were mortality and oncological follow-up., Results: The study included 193 patients with surgical colorectal cancer, with a mean age of 74 years (44-92). Screening identified 46 frail patients (24%), with a mean age of 80 years (57-92). Twenty-two patients were optimized and underwent surgery (48%), with a mean age of 78 years (57-89). Relevant adverse effect rate was 27.7% (4 grade iva adverse effects, one ivb and one v, according to Clavien-Dindo). Comprehensive Complication Index was 17.5. Palliative treatment was administered in 24 patients (52%), with a mean age of 82 years (59-92). Mean follow-up was 7.8 months. There were 2 deaths due to disease progression (8.3%), 5 re-consultations due to complications of colorectal cancer (20.1%)., Conclusions: The multidisciplinary and individualized management of frail patients with colorectal cancer is key to improve the quality of care in the treatment of this patient group., (Copyright © 2020 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The complexity of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment calls for a multidisciplinary approach. We therefore created a multidisciplinary team to manage surgical care. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of the patients we evaluated and the outcomes of the surgical techniques used., Material and Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of 104 patients evaluated by our surgical case management team between September 2015 and July 2018., Results: Surgery was used to treat 46% of the patients with HS who were evaluated. Most were men (73%) with no family history of HS (63%) and smokers or former smokers (76%). Gluteal HS comprised the largest phenotype group (41%) and the majority of cases were serious (Hurley stage II, 36%; stage III, 46%). The anatomical regions with the largest number of lesions were the axillae (51.9%) and the groin (41.3%). Surgery was most often performed in the axilla (38.3%), followed by the gluteus (23.4%). The most common drug treatment was a combination of rifampicin and clindamycin, Deroofing was the technique used most often (in 48% of the patients who underwent surgery). Postoperative outcomes were assessed as satisfactory overall in 63.4% of the cases. The HS lesion recurred in 20% and 12% developed wound dehiscence., Conclusions: Our experience leads us to recommend forming multidisciplinary teams to improve communication between specialists, provide tailored treatment for the patient with HS, and improve follow-up., (Copyright © 2020 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite the excellent results obtained with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the efforts for minimizing the ports needed to reduce postoperative pain, for a quicker recovery and to improve the patient's cosmetics continue. The aim of this study is to report the results of the first 100 cases of single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in a secondary care hospital., Material and Methods: Prospective, observational and unicentric study including 100 patients between January 2010 and April 2012., Inclusion Criteria: symptomatic cholelythiasis patients over 16-years of age on whom a single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed., Exclusion Criteria: history of acute cholecystitis, pancreatitis or suspected choledocholithiasis, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, BMI>35 and previous laparotomies. We studied epidemiological, surgical and safety variables., Results: The mean patient age was 39,89 ± 11,5 years. The mean time of the surgical procedure was 67,94 ± 25,5 min. There were 2 cases of postoperative complications. A non-infected seroma and a biliar leak. In 2 cases the use of an accessory trocar was needed. The mean hospital stay was 1,13 ± 0,8 days. A total of 35% patients were included in the major ambulatory surgery programme.The overall patient satisfaction survey rating showed a high level of cosmetic satisfaction in 100% of patients., Conclusions: Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a good technique when performed in selected cases by expert surgeons. It is feasible to include the single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a major ambulatory surgery programme. We have not had serious complications. There is a high cosmetic satisfaction index with this technique., (Copyright © 2013 AEC. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)