Search

Introduction: Global developmental delay (GDD) and intellectual disability (ID) are common reasons for consultation in paediatric neurology. Results from aetiological evaluations of children with GDD/ID vary greatly, and consequently, there is no universal consensus regarding which studies should be performed. Material and method: We review our experience with determining aetiological diagnoses for children with GDD/ID who were monitored by the paediatric neurology unit over the 5-year period between 2006 and 2010. Results: During the study period, 995 children with GDD/ID were monitored. An aetiological diagnosis was established for 309 patients (31%), but not in 686 (69%), despite completing numerous tests. A genetic cause was identified in 142 cases (46% of the total aetiologies established), broken down as 118 cases of genetic encephalopathy and 24 of metabolic hereditary diseases. Our data seem to indicate that diagnosis is easier when GDD/ID is associated with cerebral palsy, epilepsy, infantile spasms/West syndrome, or visual deficit, but more difficult in cases of autism spectrum disorders. Genetic studies provide an increasing number of aetiological diagnoses, and they are also becoming the first step in diagnostic studies. Array CGH (microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation) is the genetic test with the highest diagnostic yield in children with unexplained GDD/ID. Discussion: The cost-effectiveness of complementary studies seems to be low if there are no clinically suspected entities. However, even in the absence of treatment, aetiological diagnosis is always important in order to provide genetic counselling and possible prenatal diagnosis, resolve family (and doctors’) queries, and halt further diagnostic studies. Resumen: Introducción: El retraso global del desarrollo (RGD) y la discapacidad intelectual (DI) son motivos de consulta frecuentes en la práctica neuropediátrica. El rendimiento de los estudios diagnósticos en niños con RGD/DI varía ampliamente y, en consecuencia, no hay acuerdo universal respecto a los estudios que se deben realizar. Material y método: Revisamos nuestra experiencia en el diagnóstico etiológico de los niños con RGD/DI valorados en la consulta de Neuropediatría durante un periodo de 5 años: 2006-2010. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio fueron valorados 995 niños con RGD/DI. El diagnóstico etiológico fue establecido en 309 (31%) y no en 686 (69%), a pesar de múltiples estudios realizados. En 142 niños, el 46% de los casos con diagnóstico etiológico establecido, la causa es genética: 118 encefalopatías genéticas y 24 enfermedades metabólicas hereditarias. Nuestros datos indican que establecer un diagnóstico etiológico es más fácil cuando el RGD/DI está asociado a parálisis cerebral infantil, epilepsia, espasmos infantiles/síndrome de West o déficit visual, pero más difícil en casos de trastorno del espectro autista. Los estudios genéticos están incrementando los diagnósticos etiológicos y constituyéndose en el primer escalón de estudio. El microarray comparative genomic hybridisation es la prueba con mayor rentabilidad diagnóstica en el estudio de RGD/DI. Discusión: El coste-efectividad de los exámenes complementarios es aparentemente bajo en ausencia de orientación clínica. Incluso en ausencia de tratamiento, el diagnóstico etiológico es importante para establecer un consejo genético y posible diagnóstico prenatal, resolver cuestiones a padres y profesionales, y cesar la realización de más pruebas complementarias. Keywords: Global developmental delay, Intellectual disability, Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation, Palabras clave: Retraso psicomotor global, Discapacidad intelectual, Diagnóstico etiológico, Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation

Resumen: Introducción: El retraso global del desarrollo (RGD) y la discapacidad intelectual (DI) son motivos de consulta frecuentes en la práctica neuropediátrica. El rendimiento de los estudios diagnósticos en niños con RGD/DI varía ampliamente y, en consecuencia, no hay acuerdo universal respecto a los estudios que se deben realizar. Material y método: Revisamos nuestra experiencia en el diagnóstico etiológico de los niños con RGD/DI valorados en la consulta de Neuropediatría durante un periodo de 5 años: 2006-2010. Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio fueron valorados 995 niños con RGD/DI. El diagnóstico etiológico fue establecido en 309 (31%) y no en 686 (69%), a pesar de múltiples estudios realizados. En 142 niños, el 46% de los casos con diagnóstico etiológico establecido, la causa es genética: 118 encefalopatías genéticas y 24 enfermedades metabólicas hereditarias. Nuestros datos indican que establecer un diagnóstico etiológico es más fácil cuando el RGD/DI está asociado a parálisis cerebral infantil, epilepsia, espasmos infantiles/síndrome de West o déficit visual, pero más difícil en casos de trastorno del espectro autista. Los estudios genéticos están incrementando los diagnósticos etiológicos y constituyéndose en el primer escalón de estudio. El microarray comparative genomic hybridisation es la prueba con mayor rentabilidad diagnóstica en el estudio de RGD/DI. Discusión: El coste-efectividad de los exámenes complementarios es aparentemente bajo en ausencia de orientación clínica. Incluso en ausencia de tratamiento, el diagnóstico etiológico es importante para establecer un consejo genético y posible diagnóstico prenatal, resolver cuestiones a padres y profesionales, y cesar la realización de más pruebas complementarias. Abstract: Introduction: Global developmental delay (GDD) and intellectual disability (ID) are common reasons for consultation in paediatric neurology. Results from aetiological evaluations of children with GDD/ID vary greatly, and consequently, there is no universal consensus regarding which studies should be performed. Material and method: We review our experience with determining aetiological diagnoses for children with GDD/ID who were monitored by the paediatric neurology unit over the 5-year period between 2006 and 2010. Results: During the study period, 995 children with GDD/ID were monitored. An aetiological diagnosis was established for 309 patients (31%), but not in 686 (69%), despite completing numerous tests. A genetic cause was identified in 142 cases (46% of the total aetiologies established), broken down as 118 cases of genetic encephalopathy and 24 of metabolic hereditary diseases. Our data seem to indicate that diagnosis is easier when GDD/ID is associated with cerebral palsy, epilepsy, infantile spasms/West syndrome, or visual deficit, but more difficult in cases of autism spectrum disorders. Genetic studies provide an increasing number of aetiological diagnoses, and they are also becoming the first step in diagnostic studies. Array CGH (microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation) is the genetic test with the highest diagnostic yield in children with unexplained GDD/ID. Discussion: The cost-effectiveness of complementary studies seems to be low if there are no clinically suspected entities. However, even in the absence of treatment, aetiological diagnosis is always important in order to provide genetic counselling and possible prenatal diagnosis, resolve family (and doctors’) queries, and halt further diagnostic studies. Palabras clave: Retraso psicomotor global, Discapacidad intelectual, Diagnóstico etiológico, Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation, Keywords: Global developmental delay, Intellectual disability, Microarray comparative genomic hybridisation

Resumen: Introducción: Consideramos encefalopatías prenatales las que tienen datos clínicos o prenatales de encefalopatía antes del nacimiento. Afectan a un número importante de niños controlados en las consultas de neuropediatría. Pueden ser disruptivas (por problemas vasculares durante el embarazo, drogas, tóxicos o infecciones congénitas), y genéticamente determinadas. Incluimos casos de trastorno del espectro autista y retardo mental sin historia de sufrimiento perinatal o postnatal. Material y métodos: Se revisa nuestra experiencia en el diagnóstico etiológico de las encefalopatías prenatales durante los últimos 19 años. Se analizan los estudios realizados en los casos sin diagnóstico etiológico. Resultados: En el periodo de estudio de 19 años y 5 meses, en la base de datos de neuropediatría figuran 11.910 niños. Tienen establecido el diagnóstico de encefalopatía prenatal 1596 (13,5%). De ellos no tienen diagnóstico etiológico preciso 1.307 niños (81,4%) pese a habérseles realizado múltiples estudios complementarios, fundamentalmente bioquímicos, genéticos y de neuroimagen. Discusión: Muchos de los niños incluidos en este estudio presentan enfermedades raras, estén o no identificadas, que demandan crecientemente un diagnóstico precoz. Enfermedades peroxisomales, lisosomales, mitocondriales, defectos congénitos de la glucosilación, entre otras enfermedades metabólicas hereditarias, infecciones congénitas, cromosomopatías y genopatías, pueden ser indistinguibles clínicamente y necesitan estudios específicos para su identificación. Un diagnóstico precoz precisa estrategias de estudios sistemáticos de forma escalonada, priorizando las enfermedades que tienen posibilidades terapéuticas y en muchos casos es necesaria también una aproximación individualizada. Creemos que las ventajas potenciales del diagnóstico precoz, incluido el ahorro de más pruebas, y la prevención, probablemente sobrepasan el gasto financiero. Abstract: Introduction: We examine those prenatal encephalopathies with clinical or neuroimaging data of encephalopathy before the birth. They affect a significant number of children seen by paediatric neurologists. They can be of disruptive origin (due to vascular problems, drugs, toxins or congenital infections), and genetically determined. We include cases of autism spectrum disorder and mental retardation with no history of perinatal of postnatal damages. Material and methods: We analysed our 19 year neuro-paediatric data base in search of prenatal encephalopathies and their diagnostic origin. We also analyse the studies made in the cases with a diagnosis of unknown origin. Results: The 19 year period of study in the data base included 11,910 children, and 1596 (13.5%) were considered as prenatal encephalopathies; 1307 children (81.4%) had a diagnosis of unknown origin, despite many investigations being done in a large number of them. Discussion: Most of the children included in this study suffer a rare disease, and whether they are identified or not, they increasingly require an early diagnosis. Peroxisomal, mitochondrial, lysosomal diseases, carbohydrate glycosylation deficiency syndrome and other inborn error of metabolism, congenital infections and genetic encephalopathies, can be clinically indistinguishable in early life and require specific studies to identify them. Early diagnosis requires strategies using step-wise systematic studies, giving priority to those diseases that could be treated, and in many cases using an individualised approach. We believe that the potential benefits of early diagnosis, including savings on further studies, genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis, overcome the financial costs. Palabras clave: Diagnóstico etiológico, Diagnóstico precoz, Encefalopatías prenatales, Enfermedades raras, Estudios bioquímicos, Estudios genéticos, Neuroimagen, Keywords: Biochemical studies, Early diagnosis: aetiological diagnosis, Genetic studies, Neuroimaging, Prenatal encephalopathies, Rare diseases

Introduction: We examine those prenatal encephalopathies with clinical or neuroimaging data of encephalopathy before the birth. They affect a significant number of children seen by paediatric neurologists. They can be of disruptive origin (due to vascular problems, drugs, toxins or congenital infections), and genetically determined. We include cases of autism spectrum disorder and mental retardation with no history of perinatal of postnatal damages. Material and methods: We analysed our 19-year neuro-paediatric data base in search of prenatal encephalopathies and their diagnostic origin. We also analyse the studies made in the cases with a diagnosis of unknown origin. Results: The 19-year period of study in the data base included 11,910 children, and 1596 (13.5%) were considered as prenatal encephalopathies; 1307 children (81.4%) had a diagnosis of unknown origin, despite many investigations being done in a large number of them. Discussion: Most of the children included in this study suffer a rare disease, and whether they are identified or not, they increasingly require an early diagnosis. Peroxisomal, mitochondrial, lysosomal diseases, carbohydrate glycosylation deficiency syndrome and other inborn error of metabolism, congenital infections and genetic encephalopathies, can be clinically indistinguishable in early life and require specific studies to identify them. Early diagnosis requires strategies using step-wise systematic studies, giving priority to those diseases that could be treated, and in many cases using an individualised approach. We believe that the potential benefits of early diagnosis, including savings on further studies, genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis, overcome the financial costs. Resumen: Introducción: Consideramos encefalopatías prenatales las que tienen datos clínicos o prenatales de encefalopatía antes del nacimiento. Afectan a un número importante de niños controlados en las consultas de neuropediatría. Pueden ser disruptivas (por problemas vasculares durante el embarazo, drogas, tóxicos o infecciones congénitas), y genéticamente determinadas. Incluimos casos de trastorno del espectro autista y retardo mental sin historia de sufrimiento perinatal o postnatal. Material y métodos: Se revisa nuestra experiencia en el diagnóstico etiológico de las encefalopatías prenatales durante los últimos 19 años. Se analizan los estudios realizados en los casos sin diagnóstico etiológico. Resultados: En el periodo de estudio de 19 años y 5 meses, en la base de datos de neuropediatría figuran 11.910 niños. Tienen establecido el diagnóstico de encefalopatía prenatal 1596 (13,5%). De ellos no tienen diagnóstico etiológico preciso 1.307 niños (81,4%) pese a habérseles realizado múltiples estudios complementarios, fundamentalmente bioquímicos, genéticos y de neuroimagen. Discusión: Muchos de los niños incluidos en este estudio presentan enfermedades raras, estén o no identificadas, que demandan crecientemente un diagnóstico precoz. Enfermedades peroxisomales, lisosomales, mitocondriales, defectos congénitos de la glucosilación, entre otras enfermedades metabólicas hereditarias, infecciones congénitas, cromosomopatías y genopatías, pueden ser indistinguibles clínicamente y necesitan estudios específicos para su identificación. Un diagnóstico precoz precisa estrategias de estudios sistemáticos de forma escalonada, priorizando las enfermedades que tienen posibilidades terapéuticas y en muchos casos es necesaria también una aproximación individualizada. Creemos que las ventajas potenciales del diagnóstico precoz, incluido el ahorro de más pruebas, y la prevención, probablemente sobrepasan el gasto financiero. Keywords: Biochemical studies, Early diagnosis: aetiological diagnosis, Genetic studies, Neuroimaging, Prenatal encephalopathies, Rare diseases, Palabras clave: Diagnóstico etiológico, Diagnóstico precoz, Encefalopatías prenatales, Enfermedades raras, Estudios bioquímicos, Estudios genéticos, Neuroimagen

Introduction: The prognosis of epilepsy is basically determined by its aetiology. Early onset of seizures is generally associated with poor progress. Material and methods: We review our experience in epilepsy with children born after 1 January 1997 and who had their first seizure between 1 and 3 months of age before January 2008. Results: Eighteen cases diagnosed with epilepsy and a first seizure between 1 and 3 months of age were included. One case was within the Dravet syndrome spectrum with the c829 T>G c277G heterozygous mutation of the SCN1A gene. Four were cryptogenic epilepsies and thirteen were asymptomatic: 2 were inborn errors of metabolism (biotinidase deficiency with a response to biotin and Leigh's syndrome); 2 were of infectious origin and the remaining nine prenatal encephalopathy. Nine (50%) currently have a severe psychomotor delay and 2 died. The cryptogenic cases had a relatively poor progress. Conclusions: Our experience corroborates the poor prognosis associated with early onset, between 1 and 3 months, of epileptic seizures. Given the wide aetiological range and the poor prognosis in the absence of specific treatment, an appropriate diagnostic-therapeutic strategy is required to avoid diagnostic uncertainties and can identify potentially treatable cases, such as some inborn errors of metabolism. In this age group, the protocol for convulsions of unknown cause must be the same as that for neonatal convulsions, including treatment with a vitamin cocktail, after collecting biological samples. Resumen: Introducción: El pronóstico de la epilepsia está determinado fundamentalmente por la etiología; se asocia en general peor evolución con comienzo precoz de las crisis. Material y métodos: Se revisa nuestra experiencia en epilepsia en niños nacidos después del 1-1-1997 y que presentaron la primera crisis antes de enero de 2008 a los 1–3 meses de edad. Resultados: Se incluyen 18 casos con el diagnóstico de epilepsia y primera crisis entre 1 y 3 meses de edad. Un caso corresponde al espectro de síndrome de Dravet con la mutación en heterocigosis c829 T>G c277G del gen SCN1A. Cuatro son epilepsias criptogénicas y 13, sintomáticas: 2 errores congénitos del metabolismo (deficiencia de biotinidasa con respuesta a biotina y síndrome de Leigh), 2 de etiología infecciosa y los 9 restantes, encefalopatías prenatales; 9 (50%) tienen un grave retraso psicomotor en la actualidad y 2 fallecieron. En comparación, los casos criptogénicos tuvieron peor evolución. Conclusiones: Nuestra experiencia corrobora el mal pronóstico asociado al inicio precoz, entre 1 y 3 meses, de las crisis epilépticas. Dado el amplio abanico etiológico y el pronóstico sombrío, en ausencia de tratamiento específico, es obligada una adecuada estrategia diagnóstico-terapéutica que evite incertidumbres diagnósticas e identifique casos potencialmente tratables como algunos errores congénitos del metabolismo. En este grupo de edad el protocolo de convulsiones de causa no aclarada debe ser el mismo que el de las convulsiones neonatales, incluido el tratamiento con cóctel vitamínico, tras la recogida de muestras biológicas. Keywords: Biotinidase deficiency, Epilepsy, Cryptogenic epilepsy, Symptomatic epilepsy, Inborn error of metabolism, Infancy, Psychomotor delay, Dravet's syndrome, Palabras clave: Déficit de biotinidasa, Epilepsia, Epilepsias criptogénicas, Epilepsias sintomáticas, Error congénito del metabolismo, Lactante, Retraso psicomotor, Síndrome de Dravet

Resumen: Introducción: El pronóstico de la epilepsia está determinado fundamentalmente por la etiología; se asocia en general peor evolución con comienzo precoz de las crisis. Material y métodos: Se revisa nuestra experiencia en epilepsia en niños nacidos después del 1-1-1997 y que presentaron la primera crisis antes de enero de 2008 a los 1-3 meses de edad. Resultados: Se incluyen 18 casos con el diagnóstico de epilepsia y primera crisis entre 1 y 3 meses de edad. Un caso corresponde al espectro de síndrome de Dravet con la mutación en heterocigosis c829 T>G c277G del gen SCN1A. Cuatro son epilepsias criptogénicas y 13, sintomáticas: 2 errores congénitos del metabolismo (deficiencia de biotinidasa con respuesta a biotina y síndrome de Leigh), 2 de etiología infecciosa y los 9 restantes, encefalopatías prenatales; 9 (50%) tienen un grave retraso psicomotor en la actualidad y 2 fallecieron. En comparación, los casos criptogénicos tuvieron peor evolución. Conclusiones: Nuestra experiencia corrobora el mal pronóstico asociado al inicio precoz, entre 1 y 3 meses, de las crisis epilépticas. Dado el amplio abanico etiológico y el pronóstico sombrío, en ausencia de tratamiento específico, es obligada una adecuada estrategia diagnóstico-terapéutica que evite incertidumbres diagnósticas e identifique casos potencialmente tratables como algunos errores congénitos del metabolismo. En este grupo de edad el protocolo de convulsiones de causa no aclarada debe ser el mismo que el de las convulsiones neonatales, incluido el tratamiento con cóctel vitamínico, tras la recogida de muestras biológicas. Abstract: Introduction: The prognosis of epilepsy is basically determined by its aetiology. Early onset of seizures is generally associated with poor progress. Material and methods: We review our experience in epilepsy with children born after 1 January 1997 and who had their first seizure between 1 and 3 months of age before January 2008. Results: Eighteen cases diagnosed with epilepsy and a first seizure between 1 and 3 months of age were included. One case was within the Dravet syndrome spectrum with the c829 T>G c277G heterozygous mutation of the SCN1A gene. Four were cryptogenic epilepsies and thirteen were asymptomatic: 2 were inborn errors of metabolism (biotinidase deficiency with a response to biotin and Leigh's syndrome); 2 were of infectious origin and the remaining nine prenatal encephalopathy. Nine (50%) currently have a severe psychomotor delay and 2 died. The cryptogenic cases had a relatively poor progress. Conclusions: Our experience corroborates the poor prognosis associated with early onset, between 1 and 3 months, of epileptic seizures. Given the wide aetiological range and the poor prognosis in the absence of specific treatment, an appropriate diagnostic-therapeutic strategy is required to avoid diagnostic uncertainties and can identify potentially treatable cases, such as some inborn errors of metabolism. In this age group, the protocol for convulsions of unknown cause must be the same as that for neonatal convulsions, including treatment with a vitamin cocktail, after collecting biological samples. Palabras clave: Déficit de biotinidasa, Epilepsia, Epilepsias criptogénicas, Epilepsias sintomáticas, Error congénito del metabolismo, Lactante, Retraso psicomotor, Síndrome de Dravet, Keywords: Biotinidase deficiency, Epilepsy, Cryptogenic epilepsy, Symptomatic epilepsy, Inborn error of metabolism, Infancy, Psychomotor delay, Dravet's syndrome

Introduction: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) and Angelman syndrome (AS) were the first syndromes in humans that were known to originate from the phenomenon of the genomic imprinting. We review our experience of 21 years with PWS and AS that were confirmed with the genetically., Results: Of the 13,875 patients recorded during the study period, 11 were diagnosed with PWS (18%), 7 males (63.6%) and 4 females (36.4%), with a mean age of 9.06 years (+/- 6.92, range: 0.68-21.6). The time of the follow up of this group was 3.83 years (+/- 4.03, range: 0.49-15.3), and the age at diagnosis was 4.4 years (+/- 6.84, range: 0.03-19.38). Almost three quarters (72.7% of the PWS patients had a uniparental dysomy and 27.3% a paternal deletion. Six patients (8%) were diagnosed with AS, 4 females (66.6%) and 2 males (33.4%), with a mean age of 14.65 years (+/- 11.89, range: 1.3-30.7). The time of follow up was 6.76 years (+/- 5.89,range: 0.16-15), and the age at diagnosis was 8.84 years (+/- 9.11, range: 1.10-23). A maternal deletion was present in 83.3% of the AS patients and 16.7% had a maternal dysomy., Discussion: As genetic advances are made these pathologies are confirmed before. Unlike the data in the literature, in our series most patients diagnosed with PWS (72'3%) had uniparental disomy. Recent studies correlation genotype with phenotype, in PWS is more serious if it occurs a deletion and in SA is milder in the case of uniparental disomy., Conclusions: Genetic studies must be performed in view of the established clinical symptoms: neonatal hypotonia of unknown cause in PWS and psychomotor deficits with autism features, particularly associated with epilepsy, must be evaluated in AS to prevent diagnostic uncertainties, unnecessary complementary examinations and to provide early genetic counselling., (Copyright © 2011 Asociación Española de Pediatría. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)