Search

Objective: To compile an inventory of information requests prioritized by the family members, to find out which professionals them consider able to respond these requests, and to explore the differences in perception between family members and professionals., Design: Qualitative analysis of content validation and descriptive cross-sectional study., Scope: 41 Spanish ICU., Participants: Relatives, physicians and nurses of critical patients., Intervention: From an initial list of questions extracted from literature review, physicians, nurses, and relatives of critical patients incorporated issues that they considered not included. After analyzing content validity, a new list was obtained, which was again submitted to the participants' assessment to evaluate the level of importance that they assigned to each question and which professional they considered appropriate to answer it., Results: most important questions for the relatives: concern about the clinical situation, measures to be taken, prognosis and information. There was a coincidence between relatives and professionals in the priority issues for families. There were significant differences in the importance given to each question: between doctors and relatives (72/82 questions), and between nurses and relatives (66/82 questions) (P<.05). For the relatives, 63% of the questions could be answered by doctors or nurses, 27% preferably by doctors and 10% by nurses., Conclusions: The most relevant issues for families were prognosis and severity, but also the need for information. Healthcare professionals tend to underestimate the importance of many of the questions that concern families. Relatives feel that most of their concerns can be resolved either by doctors or nurses., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Participatory action research (PAR) was conducted in an intensive care unit (UCI), with the general purpose of fostering change in clinical practice so as to improve the care offered to families of critically ill patients. As a result of this process, four change-related initiatives were introduced. One specific additional objective was to explore how the unit's background context limited or facilitated change. This paper presents findings based on this objective., Materials and Methods: Qualitative methodology., Design: Participatory-action research (PAR). DATA GATHERING TECHNIQUES: 11 discussion groups incorporating professionals, 5 in-depth interviews with professionals, field diaries kept by the participants, and field diary kept by the lead researcher. Eleven professionals took part in the discussion groups (each one conveyed information made known to them by 3-5 colleagues), 5 professionals were involved in the interviews, and 11 professionals filled in a field diary. A content analysis was performed., Results: Factors limiting change included: 1) Not acknowledging the legitimacy of scientific evidence regarding the families of critically ill patients; 2) Imbalanced power relationships among the members of multi-disciplinary teams; 3) Nurses' lack of involvement in information flow; 4) The organization of time and physical space in the unit. Factors facilitating change: 1) A sense of individual and shared commitment; 2) Leadership in day-to-day matters; 3) A process based on reflection., Conclusions: A process of participatory action research can lead to change in clinical practice, although this is complex and requires substantial input in terms of personal energy. Contextual factors limiting this change are related to the actual structure of the unit, while factors facilitating it are circumstantial ones and are dependent upon individual people. In this sense, professionals working at the bedside are capable of introducing changes to the context in which they work., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEEIUC. All rights reserved.)

Aim: A participatory action-research was conducted in an intensive care unit (ICU). A consensus was reached on four proposals for change regarding how to deal with the relatives of the critically ill patients, extending their visiting hours being one of these proposals. This study has aimed to ascertain the contributions of the unit professionals to a new proposal regarding visiting hours., Participants and Methods: The sample included 93 ICU professionals out of 205. A qualitative methodology study that included a two-item open survey was used: 1. Yes, I agree with the proposal (explain how you would improve it); 2. No, I do not agree with the proposal (explain why and how you would improve it). Content analysis and triangulation of researchers and participants were performed. The theoretical saturation point was reached., Results: Five categories emerged: 1) Modify the initial proposal; 2) Agreement with the proposal; 3) Doubts; 4) Barriers to implementation; 5) Flexibilization., Conclusions: ICU professionals are reluctant to open their units, but accept the extension of current visiting hours. The physical structure of the unit is perceived as a major barrier., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEEIUC. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Within the context of participatory action research (PAR), a 4-stage process was established with the general aim of promoting improvements in the care offered to families of patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The 4 stages consisted of a situational diagnosis, proposals for change, the design and implementation of the proposals, and an evaluation. This paper presents the first 2 stages., Objectives: To define the attention given to families of patients in the Intensive Care Unit. To reach a consensus on areas for action/intervention in the unit., Materials and Method: A qualitative methodology., Design: PAR. Data-collection technique: 4 focus groups made up of 10 professionals, and consensus with support groups made up of 30 members. Content analysis was performed. The theoretical saturation point was reached., Results: Two documents were drawn up: 1) A situational diagnosis, describing the current situation of the attention given to families and 2) 10 proposals for change, 5 of which were given priority. They were: a session to familiarize professionals with evidence concerning families of patients in the ICU and the handing out of informative leaflets, the improvement of (nurse-family and intra-team) informative procedures, more privacy for patients and a reduction in environmental noise, a training plan for professionals, and change in the visiting policy., Conclusion: By using consensus-based methodologies, strategies for change can be prioritized and designed, adapted to the context in which they will be applied., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier España, S.L. y SEEIUC. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and aim. Nursing professionals in intensive care units (ICU) face situations of uncertainty and anxiety, above all in patients' relatives. In the literature, we find that the way in which the family and their needs are valued by professionals in the unit is not very systematical, even though there are instruments that have been validated for this purpose. Therefore, we decided to value what perspective ICU nurses have of the relationship they establish with patients' relatives, in order to find possible explanations for this situation. Material and methods. A qualitative study with a critical-social orientation. This was carred out in three ICUs in three state hospitals in Mallorca. Research techniques: 8 observations of the visit of relatives to the unit and 6 semi-structured interviews with nurses from the three hospitals. The transcripts of the interviews were analysed and codified in significance units. Sources and methods were triangulated.Results. Categories of the relationship process: 1) who the social actors are; 2) what the actions of the nurses with respect to the relatives are; 3) what the relationships are like between both; and 4) expectations of the nurses regarding this relationship.Conclusions. a) It is necessary to establish quality standards for attending the relatives of critical patients. b) Continuous nursing training is necessary in order to provide emotional support to families and to protect nurses from the added stress involved in providing this emotional support.