1. Glucose infusion test: A new screening test for vascular access recirculation
- Author
-
Francesco Copello, Sandro Alloatti, Alberto Magnasco, Giovanna Bonfant, and Paolo Solari
- Subjects
dialysis efficiency ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Vascular access ,Urology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Catheters, Indwelling ,Bolus (medicine) ,Glucose infusion ,Renal Dialysis ,In vivo ,medicine ,Humans ,Urea ,Detection limit ,urea test ,business.industry ,vascular access ,Confidence interval ,Surgery ,cardiopulmonary recirculation ,Glucose ,chemistry ,Nephrology ,Hemodialysis ,business - Abstract
Glucose infusion test: A new screening test for vascular access recirculation. Background Vascular access recirculation is an important cause of diminished dialysis efficiency. We propose a new screening test based on glucose infusion as a tracer for recirculation. Methods The glucose infusion test (GIT) protocol comprises a basal blood sample (A) from the arterial port, a 5 mL bolus of 20% glucose into the venous chamber (time 0), followed by a second sample (B) in four seconds (from 13 to 17 s with Q B 300 mL/min) from the same port. The blood glucose level is determined at the bedside on A and B with a reflectance photometer (CV 1.8%). Interpretation of the test is straightforward: If B=A, there is no recirculation, whereas if B > A, recirculation can be calculated from the regression equation: 0.046 × (B - A) + 0.07, obtained from in vitro tests reproducing artificial recirculation at 0, 5, and 10%. To validate this new method in vivo, we compared GIT and the urea test on 39 hemodialysis patients, obtaining a good correlation ( r = 0.93). The two tests were considered positive (recirculation present) when the lower 95% confidence intervals were more than zero. Results Our patients were divided into two groups: those with (22 out of 39, mean recirculation 11.8%) or without recirculation (17 out of 39, mean 0.06%). The urea test did not recognize 7 out of 22 patients because they had a small recirculation below the urea test limit of detection. Conclusions GIT was more sensitive (detection limit 0.3%), simpler, and immediate in showing the results than the urea test. It is an accurate and low-cost technique for screening and follow-up of vascular access in a dialysis unit.
- Published
- 2000