1. Loaded forced-marching shifts mechanical contributions proximally and disrupts stride-to-stride joint work modulation in recruit aged women
- Author
-
Dennis E. Dever, William Anderst, Shawn D. Flanagan, Kellen T. Krajewski, Qi Mi, Camille C. Johnson, Ian T. Allen, Nizam Uddin Ahamed, and Chris Connaboy
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Knee Joint ,Biophysics ,STRIDE ,Walking ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Gait (human) ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Modulation (music) ,Humans ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Gait ,Joint (geology) ,business.industry ,Rehabilitation ,Work (physics) ,Motor control ,030229 sport sciences ,Biomechanical Phenomena ,Power (physics) ,Detrended fluctuation analysis ,Female ,Hip Joint ,business ,Ankle Joint ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Military personnel in combat roles often perform gait tasks with additional load, which can affect the contributions of joint mechanical work (positive and negative). Furthermore, different locomotion patterns can also affect joint specific work contributions. While mean behavior of joint work is important to understanding gait, changes in joint kinetic modulation, or the regulation/control of stride-to-stride joint work variability is necessary to elucidate locomotor system function. Suboptimal modulation exhibited as a stochastic time-series (large fluctuation followed by an opposite smaller fluctuation) could potentially affect locomotion efficiency and portend injury risk. It remains unclear how the locomotor system responds to a combination of load perturbations and varying locomotion patterns.What are the interactive effects of load magnitude and locomotion pattern on joint positive/negative work and joint work modulation in healthy, active, recruit-aged women?Eleven healthy, active, recruit-aged (18-33 years) women ran and forced-marched (walking at a velocity an individual would typically jog) in bodyweight (BW), an additional 25 % of BW (+25 %BW) and an additional 45 % of BW (+45 %BW) conditions at a velocity above their gait transition velocity. Joint work was calculated as the time integral of joint power. Joint work modulation was assessed with detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) on consecutive joint work time-series.Joint work contributions shifted proximally for forced-marching demonstrated by lesser (p .001) positive/negative ankle work but greater (p = .001) positive hip work contributions compared to running. Running exhibited optimal positive ankle work modulation compared to forced-marching (p = .040). Knee and ankle negative joint work modulation was adversely impacted compared to the hip during forced-marching (p .001).Employing forced-marching gait while under loads of 25 and 45 % of BW reduces the ability of the plantar-flexors and knee extensors to optimally contribute to energy absorption and propulsion in recruit-aged women, potentially reducing metabolic efficiency and increasing injury risk.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF