Search

High-quality data on palliative surgery in patients with malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) caused by peritoneal metastases (PM) are lacking. We aimed to determine the utility of palliative surgery for such patients.We retrospectively analyzed patients considered for surgery for MBO, caused by PM, in our department from January 2019 to October 2020. None of them could tolerate a diet, despite conservative treatment. We investigated the clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes and calculated overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed, with the log-rank test to evaluate differences in OS rates. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine prognostic factors.Sixty (67%) patients underwent surgery, whereas, 30 (33%) received the best supportive care (BSC) treatment. A better (p = 0.002) median OS was observed in patients undergoing surgery (3.9 months) than in those receiving BSC (2.6 months). Severe complications were observed in 12 (20%) patients, including 30-day mortality (7 patients). Forty-eight (80%) patients in the surgery group could tolerate a diet and the hospital stay (mean ± standard deviation) was 20.0 ± 23.1 days. Re-obstruction was observed in five (8.3%) patients after 78.6 ± 63.3 days. Patients in the postoperative chemotherapy group exhibited a better (p 0.001) median OS (12.3 months) than did those in the no-postoperative chemotherapy group (3.5 months). Only postoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.264, 95% confidence interval 0.143-0.487, p 0.001) was identified as an independent prognostic factor.Compared with BSC, surgery is associated with a better OS in patients with MBO due to PM. Surgery should be considered as a bridge to systemic treatment for such patients.

Classic colon cancer surgery refers to a wide resection of the tumor-bearing segment and the lymphatics draining along the named artery. The concept of TME has been applied to colon cancer and complete mesocolic excision (CME) in conjuction with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been introduced as the surgical treatment for colon cancer. Here, we discuss appropriate CME procedure with regard to the oncologic backgrounds, essential components, applied anatomy, laparoscopic technique, short-term, and oncologic outcomes. The introduction of CME has improved oncologic outcomes greatly in patients with colon cancer. The improved outcomes with CME can be attributed to underlying sound oncologic principles such as dissection through the proper plane of mesocolic excision, central vascular ligation, and sufficient length of proximal and distal margins. Thereby, CME technique can achieve en bloc removal of the diseased lesion with the increased amount of the colonic mesentery even though the length of for both bowel and mesentery resection remains a matter of debate. CME is a technically demanding operation thus, comprehensive understanding of the applied vascular anatomy is essential for successful CME. Favorable outcomes of open CME have been replicated with a laparoscopic approach. In future perspective, incorporating a structured education program on minimally invasive (laparoscopy or robot) CME would be beneficial.