1. Comparação de diferentes estiletes usados para intubação com o videolaringoscópio C‐MAC D‐Blade ® : um estudo randômico e controlado
- Author
-
Volkan Hanci, Dilek Ömür, Şule Özbilgin, Bahar Kuvaki, and Başak Bayram
- Subjects
Human studies ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Gum elastic bougie ,Crossover study ,Stylet ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,stomatognathic system ,Hockey stick ,Randomized controlled trial ,030202 anesthesiology ,law ,Anesthesia ,Medicine ,Intubation ,business ,Difficult intubation - Abstract
Objective The angle of the C-MAC D-Blade ® videolaryngoscope, which is used for difficult airway interventions, is not compatible with routinely used endotracheal tubes. Methods A prospective randomized crossover study was performed comparing five intubation methods for use with standardized airways, including using different stylets or no stylet: Group HS, hockey-stick stylet; Group DS, D-blade type stylet; Group CS, CoPilot ® videolaryngoscope rigid stylet ® ; Group GEB, gum elastic bougie; and Group NS, no stylet. A manikin was used to simulate difficult intubation with a Storz C-MAC D-Blade ® videolaryngoscope. The duration of each intubation stage was evaluated. Results Participants in this study (33 anesthesiology residents and 20 anesthesiology experts) completed a total of 265 intubations. The number of attempts made using no stylet was significantly greater than those made for the other groups ( p p p p Conclusion Use of the correct stylet leads to a more efficient use of the Storz C-MAC D-Blade ® . In our study, the use of the D-blade stylet, the CoPilot stylet and the hockey stick stylet provided quicker intubation, allowed easier passage of the vocal cords, and decreased the total intubation duration. To confirm the findings of our study, randomized controlled human studies are needed.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF