Search

Myosin II is the main force-generating motor during muscle contraction. Myosin II exists as different isoforms that are involved in diverse physiological functions. One outstanding question is whether the myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms alone account for these distinct physiological properties. Unique sets of essential and regulatory light chains (RLCs) are known to assemble with specific MHCs, raising the intriguing possibility that light chains contribute to specialized myosin functions. Here, we asked whether different RLCs contribute to this functional diversification. To this end, we generated chimeric motors by reconstituting the MHC fast isoform (MyHC-IId) and slow isoform (MHC-I) with different light-chain variants. As a result of the RLC swapping, actin filament sliding velocity increased by ∼10-fold for the slow myosin and decreased by >3-fold for the fast myosin. Results from ensemble molecule solution kinetics and single-molecule optical trapping measurements provided in-depth insights into altered chemo-mechanical properties of the myosin motors that affect the sliding speed. Notably, we found that the mechanical output of both slow and fast myosins is sensitive to the RLC isoform. We therefore propose that RLCs are crucial for fine-tuning the myosin function.

The myosin II motors are ATP-powered force-generating machines driving cardiac and muscle contraction. Myosin II heavy chain isoform-beta (β-MyHC) is primarily expressed in the ventricular myocardium and in slow-twitch muscle fibers, such as M. soleus. M. soleus-derived myosin II (SolM-II) is often used as an alternative to the ventricular β-cardiac myosin (βM-II); however, the direct assessment of biochemical and mechanical features of the native myosins is limited. By employing optical trapping, we examined the mechanochemical properties of native myosins isolated from the rabbit heart ventricle and soleus muscles at the single-molecule level. We found purified motors from the two tissue sources, despite expressing the same MyHC isoform, displayed distinct motile and ATPase kinetic properties. We demonstrate βM-II was approximately threefold faster in the actin filament-gliding assay than SolM-II. The maximum actomyosin (AM) detachment rate derived in single-molecule assays was also approximately threefold higher in βM-II, while the power stroke size and stiffness of the "AM rigor" crossbridge for both myosins were comparable. Our analysis revealed a higher AM detachment rate for βM-II, corresponding to the enhanced ADP release rates from the crossbridge, likely responsible for the observed differences in the motility driven by these myosins. Finally, we observed a distinct myosin light chain 1 isoform (MLC1sa) that associates with SolM-II, which might contribute to the observed kinetics differences between βM-II and SolM-II. These results have important implications for the choice of tissue sources and justify prerequisites for the correct myosin heavy and light chains to study cardiomyopathies.