1. Impact of digital tools on the research writing process: A case study of collaborative writing in computer science
- Author
-
Niina Hynninen, Department of Modern Languages 2010-2017, and Language Regulation in Academia (LaRA)
- Subjects
Cultural Studies ,Collaborative writing ,Process (engineering) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Twitter ,Context (language use) ,Text trajectory ,Field (computer science) ,Digital media ,6121 Languages ,Social media ,ARTICLE ,Writing practices ,media_common ,060201 languages & linguistics ,ENGLISH ,business.industry ,Communication ,Text history ,05 social sciences ,Perspective (graphical) ,050301 education ,06 humanities and the arts ,CONTEXT ,Multiculturalism ,0602 languages and literature ,Engineering ethics ,business ,0503 education - Abstract
This paper reports on a case study on collaborative research writing in computer science, with particular focus on the researchers' use of digital writing and social media tools. The research paper is still a prominent genre in the field, but technological advances such as the development of real-time collaborative writing tools and social media have created new opportunities for collaboration as well as the sharing of research results. This paper takes a closer look at how digital tools, particularly collaborative writing tools and Twitter, are utilised in the process of producing a research paper for publication, and how the authors and their colleagues view the role of such tools in the text production process. The data include a text history of a research paper, as well as research interviews with the main authors and their colleagues. The data have been approached from a local practices perspective, considering the paper as part of the writing practices of the multicultural research group where the authors worked. The interviews provide further perspectives on the researchers' use of digital tools. The findings shed light on collaborative research writing practices, particularly how collaborative writing tools, which enable new practices such as synchronous writing, may not be utilised by the researchers in the ways intended by the developers. The findings also highlight the significance of social media tools, particularly Twitter, in post publication activities, with important implications for researcher education. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF