Search

Spread through air spaces (STAS) is reportedly associated with worse prognosis in sublobar resections of lung adenocarcinoma. Recently, it was proposed that STAS detected on frozen sections can be an indication for lobectomy instead of sublobar resection. We undertook this study to evaluate the reliability of STAS assessment on frozen sections compared to permanent sections, as well as the associations among STAS, tumor grade, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after sublobar resection. A total of 163 stage I lung adenocarcinoma resections with frozen sections were identified retrospectively. For each case, and for frozen and permanent sections separately, the presence or absence of STAS, as well as the tumor grade, were recorded. Compared to permanent sections, STAS detection on frozen sections had low sensitivity (55%), low positive predictive value (48%), and fair agreement (K = 0.34), whereas there was higher specificity (80%) and negative predictive value (85%). Accuracy was 74%. Tumor grade assessment on frozen sections showed higher sensitivity (77%), positive predictive value (90%), agreement (K = 0.72), specificity (94%), and accuracy (87%), and the same negative predictive value (85%). High-grade histology on frozen sections was associated with shorter RFS (p = 0.02), whereas STAS on frozen sections was not (p = 0.47). Our results suggest that the intraoperative detection of STAS has low sensitivity and positive predictive value. False-positive results may lead to overtreatment of patients with lung cancer. The determination of tumor grade on frozen sections offers better sensitivity and specificity, plus it is associated with RFS, whereas STAS on frozen sections is not. Further study is needed to explore the utility of assessing tumor grade on frozen sections.

This study sought to examine the impact of nodule density on recurrence and survival in female patients with lung adenocarcinoma treated by lobectomy or sublobar resection.In this retrospective study of female patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologic stage IA adenocarcinoma, patients with preoperative imaging were included for analysis if the consolidation-to-tumor ratio was 0.5 (solid-predominant ground-glass opacity [GGO]) to 1.0 (solid). Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Risk estimates were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.For all 357 patients sublobar resection demonstrated worse 5-year DFS compared with lobectomy (76.4% vs 67.9%, P = .05). Multivariable modeling showed worse DFS with sublobar resection (hazard ratio, 1.55; P = .06) and tumors ≥ 2 cm (hazard ratio, 2.32; P = .05). On radiologic evaluation the solid-predominant GGO group (n = 81) demonstrated a smaller solid component compared with the solid nodule group (n = 163; 1.49 cm vs. 1.84 cm, respectively; P.001) yet comparable total size. The solid-predominant GGO group showed improved 5-year OS (90.8 vs 76.8, P = .01) and DFS (79.3 vs 67.2, P = .05) compared with the solid nodule group. Additionally the solid-predominant GGO group demonstrated equivalent OS (90.8% vs 90.8%, P = .93) and DFS (76.0% vs 81.7%, P = .60) with sublobar resection compared with lobectomy.In this report of female patients with stage IA adenocarcinoma, sublobar resection was associated with worse DFS compared with lobectomy in whole-group analysis. However patients with solid-predominant GGOs demonstrated improved 5-year OS and DFS compared with patients with solid nodules with equivalent outcomes regardless of resection type.

The traditional segmentectomy involves each segment as the least surgical unit to preserve more pulmonary parenchyma than lobectomy, which is also excessive for small ground glass opacity-dominated lung cancer. We report a novel technique of sublobar resection based on subsegment. Under the guidance of three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography, the nodules were classified according to their subsegmental location and removed by individual sublobar resection. That assists in removing malignant nodules with safe margins and preserves more pulmonary parenchyma. However, the oncologic efficacy and pulmonary function protection warrant follow-up.

Purpose To evaluate long-term outcomes after sublobar resection for patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who met our proposed node-negative (N0) criteria, namely solid component size d -glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Patients and Methods Between April 2006 and December 2010, a total of 347 patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma underwent complete resection in two medical centers. Long-term outcomes of patients with disease that met the N0 criteria after sublobar resection were evaluated. Results The disease of 201 patients (57.9%) met the N0 criteria. Meeting N0 criteria was significantly associated with low-grade adenocarcinoma subtype (P Conclusions Sublobar resection of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma is feasible in selected patients with disease that meets the N0 criteria, with excellent long-term survival.

Background Although sublobar resection has become widely used for lung cancer treatment, very limited data comparing outcomes following complex segmentectomy or wedge resection have been available. Questions remain regarding mortality, morbidity, surgical margin, lymph node dissection, and long-term survival outcomes. This study compares operative and postoperative outcomes of complex segmentectomy and wedge resection. Patients and Methods A total of 216 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent complex segmentectomy (n = 110) or wedge resection (n = 106) between April 2007 and March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed, and 61 propensity score–matched pairs were analyzed. Operative and postoperative results were compared. Factors affecting survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Although the complex segmentectomy group tended to have higher overall complications (26.2% vs. 16.4%; P = .27) and prolonged air leakage (11.5% vs. 6.6%; P = .53) rates than the wedge resection group, major complications (≥grade IIIa) (0% vs. 3.3%; P = .50) and 30-day mortality (0% vs. 0%; P = 1.00) rates were comparable between both groups. Complex segmentectomy provided better median surgical margin distance (15.0 vs. 10.0 mm; P = .052) and number of dissected lymph nodes (6.0 vs. 0.0 nodes; P = .0002) than wedge resection. The complex segmentectomy group tended to have better prognosis than the wedge resection group (5-year overall survival rates, 94.7% vs. 79.4% and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates, 94.0% vs. 76.5%, respectively). Conclusions Complex segmentectomy could provide better oncological and survival outcomes with acceptable perioperative safety compared with wedge resection.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicopathologic implications of tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) in patients with stage IA part-solid lung adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection.Medical records of patients with stage IA part-solid adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pulmonary resection between February 2009 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological features of STAS and its influence on postoperative recurrence and survival were investigated.Among the 115 patients with stage IA part-solid adenocarcinoma who underwent wedge resection, 20 (17.4 %) had STAS. The multivariable analysis showed presence of STAS [HR (hazard ratio), 9.447; p = 0.002) and a larger invasive component size (HR, 1.097; p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for recurrence. The 5-year freedom from recurrence rates were 62.4 % and 97.9 % in cases with and without STAS, respectively (p 0.001), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 58.5 % and 97.9 % in cases with and without STAS, respectively (p 0.001). The presence of STAS was associated with old age (p = 0.030), male gender (p = 0.023), acinar predominant histologic pattern (p = 0.004), presence of micropapillary pattern (p 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (p 0.001) and larger invasive component (p 0.001).STAS could be an important prognostic factor in patients with stage IA part-solid lung adenocarcinoma after sublobar resection. Effective preoperative evaluation and postoperative surveillance may help improve the outcome of patients with small part-solid nodules, particularly when accompanied by STAS.

Background The interaction between tumor size and the comparative prognosis of lobar and sublobar resection has been defined poorly. Research Question The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between tumor size and the receipt of segmentectomy or lobectomy in association with overall survival in patients with clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Study Design and Methods The 2004-2015 National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy or missing survival data. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards including an interaction term between tumor size and type of surgery. Results A total of 143,040 patients were included: 135,446 (95%) underwent lobectomy and 7594 (5%) underwent segmentectomy. In multivariate Cox regression, a significant three-way interaction was found among tumor size, histologic results, and type of surgery (P Interpretation In this NCDB study of patients with node-negative NSCLC, we found different tumor size thresholds, based on histologic results, that identified populations of patients who least and most benefitted from lobectomy compared with segmentectomy.

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a well-known poor prognostic factor after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. However, the prognostic effect of LVI in patients who undergo sublobar resection has not been fully evaluated. Thus, we compared the prognostic impact of LVI in stage IA patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection.We retrospectively reviewed the data from patients with stage IA NSCLC who underwent surgical resection between 2007 and 2016. The prognostic impact of LVI was calculated by the Cox proportional hazard regression model. To adjust for the differences in confounding variables between LVI-positive and LVI-negative patients, propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out in patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection.Among the stage IA NSCLC patients (n = 2134), 184 (8.6%) had been diagnosed with LVI, of whom 144 (8.9%) were in the lobectomy group (n = 1614) and 40 (7.7%) were in the sublobar resection group (n = 520). In multivariable analysis, LVI was a significant risk factor for both overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.96; p0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.68-3.17; p0.001). After PSM, the prognostic impact of LVI was greater in the sublobar resection group (HR = 4.93 and 4.25 for OS and RFS, respectively) than in the lobectomy group (HR = 1.77 and 2.51 for OS and RFS, respectively).The presence of LVI was significantly associated with worse OS and RFS in stage IA NSCLC patients. The prognostic impact of LVI was more pronounced in the sublobar resection group than in the lobectomy group.

Most focal persistent ground glass nodules (GGNs) do not progress over 10 years. Research suggests that GGNs that do not progress, those that do, and solid lung cancers are fundamentally different diseases, although histologically they seem similar. Surveillance of GGNs to identify those that gradually progress is safe and does not risk losing a window. GGNs with 5 mm solid component or less than 10 mm consolidation (mediastinal and lung windows, respectively, on thin slice CT) are highly curable with resection. The optimal type of resection is unclear; sublobar resection is reasonable but an adequate margin is critically important.

Background The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of primary treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus sublobar resection (SLR) for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with medical comorbidities. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent SBRT (n = 106) or SLR (100 wedge resection, 41 segmentectomy) because of medical comorbidities associated with stage I NSCLC were enrolled. Lesions located in the outer third of the lung field on computed tomography were defined as external, and others were defined as internal. A propensity score–matched analysis was also performed that compared SBRT and SLR results. Charts were reviewed to determine local tumor recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Results A propensity score–matched analysis, recurrence-free survival (RFS) became significant in favor of surgery (p = 0.036). For large nodules of greater than 2.0 cm in diameter, RFS was significantly better in the surgery group (p = 0.042). No significant differences in OS, DSS, or RFS were observed with small nodules of less than 2.0 cm in diameter. In the external group, a higher recurrence rate was seen for SBRT group. For internal group, there was no statistical difference between each treatment. Local recurrence rate was higher in the SBRT group (p = 0.0082) in the external group. Conclusions In a matched comparison of stage I NSCLC in patients with medical comorbidities, RFS was in favor of surgery comparing SBRT, but there were no significant differences in OS or DSS. The tumor size and tumor location should be considered before deciding whether to perform SBRT or surgery.

Resume Contexte Le traitement standard des sequestrations pulmonaires intralobaires (SIL), decouvertes a l’âge adulte, a ete jusqu’a maintenant la lobectomie par thoracotomie. Le but de ce travail est de faire le point sur les evolutions, au cours de ces dernieres annees, du traitement chirurgical des SIL de l’adulte. Methodes Nous avons repris les donnees des patients operes d’une SIL entre 2000 et 2016. Les patients ont ete repartis en deux groupes en fonction de la voie d’abord utilisee : thoracotomie postero-laterale (groupe thoracotomie) ou thoracoscopie exclusive (groupe thoracoscopie). Resultats Dix-huit patients ont ete operes d’une SIL sur notre periode d’etude. Avant 2011, tous les patients etaient operes a thorax ouvert (n = 6) puis de 2011 a 2016, par thoracotomie (n = 5) ou thoracoscopie (n = 7) en fonction de la lesion. Un patient a ete converti en raison d’adherences pleurales et est analyse dans le groupe thoracotomie. Les SIL etaient situees plus frequemment a gauche (n = 12 ; 66,6 %) qu’a droite (n = 6 ; 33,3 %) et exclusivement dans les lobes inferieurs. Dans le groupe thoracotomie (n = 11), le geste d’exerese a ete une lobectomie. Dans le groupe thoracoscopie (n = 7), 5 patients ont eu une resection infralobaire (2 segmentectomies S9 + 10, 1 pyramidectomie et 2 resections atypiques). La mortalite a ete nulle. La morbidite a ete de 45 % dans le groupe thoracotomie versus 14 % dans le groupe thoracoscopie. La duree moyenne de sejour etait de 7,4 jours dans le groupe thoracotomie versus 5,4 jours dans le groupe thoracoscopie. Conclusions Ces donnees confirment l’evolution de la prise en charge des SIL a l’âge adulte, qui peuvent etre traitees en securite par des resections infralobaires realisees a thorax ferme lorsque c’est possible.

Introduction Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a form of invasion wherein tumor cells extend beyond the tumor edge within the lung parenchyma. In lung adenocarcinoma (ADC), we investigated the (1) association between STAS and procedure-specific outcomes (sublobar resection and lobectomy), (2) effect of surgical margin-to-tumor diameter ratio in STAS-positive patients, and (3) potential utility of frozen sections (FSs) for detecting STAS intraoperatively. Methods We investigated 1497 patients who underwent lobectomy (n = 970) or sublobar resection (n = 527) for T1N0M0 lung ADC after propensity score matching. Outcomes were analyzed by using a competing risks approach. The effect of margin-to-tumor ratio on recurrence pattern (locoregional and distant) was investigated in patients who underwent sublobar resection. Five pathologists evaluated the feasibility of intraoperatively identifying STAS by using FSs (sensitivity, specificity, and interrater reliability). Results On multivariable analysis after propensity score matching (349 pairs/procedure), sublobar resection was significantly associated with recurrence (subhazard ratio = 2.84 [p Conclusions In patients with T1 lung ADC with STAS, lobectomy was associated with better outcomes than sublobar resection was. Pathologists can recognize STAS on FSs.

Introduction This work was performed to develop and validate procedure-specific risk prediction for recurrence following resection for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) and investigate risk prediction utility in identifying patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Methods In patients who underwent resection for small (≤2 cm) lung ADC (lobectomy, 557; sublobar resection, 352), an association between clinicopathologic variables and risk of recurrence was assessed by a competing risks approach. Procedure-specific risk prediction was developed based on multivariable regression for recurrence. External validation was conducted using cohorts (N = 708) from Japan, Taiwan, and Germany. The accuracy of risk prediction was measured using a concordance index. We applied the lobectomy risk prediction approach to a propensity score–matched cohort of patients with stage II-III disease (n = 316, after matching) with or without ACT and compared lung cancer–specific survival between groups among low- or high-risk scores. Results Micropapillary pattern, solid pattern, lymphovascular invasion, and necrosis were involved in the risk prediction following lobectomy, and micropapillary pattern, spread through air spaces, lymphovascular invasion, and necrosis following sublobar resection. Both internal and external validation showed good discrimination (concordance index in lobectomy and sublobar resection: internal, 0.77 and 0.75, respectively; and external, 0.73 and 0.79, respectively). In the stage II-III propensity score–matched cohort, among high-risk patients, ACT significantly reduced the risk of lung cancer–specific death (subhazard ratio 0.43, p = 0.001), but not among low-risk patients. Conclusions Procedure-specific risk prediction for patients with resected small lung ADC can be used to better prognosticate and stratify patients for further interventions.

In high-risk operable geriatric patients undergoing palliative sublobar resection (SR), noncancerous comorbidities may contribute to unfavorable outcomes. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the perioperative safety and long-term survival of palliative SR in this patient population.We reviewed 232 patients (141 male, 91 female) aged ≥75 years who underwent surgical resection of clinical stage I lung cancer from 2006 to 2014. The patients were divided into two groups, lobectomy and SR, and preoperative comprehensive comorbidities were assessed using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) and compared between the two groups. The operative safety was compared using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Survival rates were calculated with a Kaplan-Meier model under propensity score matching, and prognostic factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model.Lobectomy was performed in 156 patients and SR in 76 (segmentectomy, n = 50; wedge resection, n = 26). Age (p = 0.0137), tumor size on computed tomography (p 0.0001), central tumor location (p = 0.0008), and high ACE-27 scores (p = 0.0202) were significantly associated with selection of SR. No mortality occurred, and the incidence of Grade 3b or greater postoperative complications in lobectomy and SR was 5.1% and 5.3%, respectively. According to the analysis of propensity score-matched patients (n = 57, tumor size = 23 mm, and consolidation/tumor ratio = 83%), the 5-year survival rate in lobectomy and SR was 81.1% and 73.5%, respectively (p = 0.4374). The ACE-27 score was a more significant prognostic factor than the type of surgical procedure, as well as consolidation/tumor ratio and nodal metastatic status.The severity of preoperative comorbidities is a significant prognostic factor, and SR as a compromise surgical procedure may provide promising short- and long-term outcomes in selected geriatric patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.

To compare sublobar resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients undergoing sublobar resection or SBRT for stage I NSCLC from 2007 to 2014 at Duke University Medical Center were evaluated. The primary endpoint of interest was freedom from local recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazards multivariate analyses were performed.221 patients with stage I NSCLC undergoing sublobar resection (n = 151; 105 wedge and 46 segmentectomy) or SBRT (n = 70) were evaluated. The majority (89%) of patients receiving SBRT were medically inoperable, and compared with surgical patients, were significantly older (74 vs 70 years, p = 0.019), had higher Charlson Comorbidity Indices (3.7 vs 2.7, p 0.001), larger tumors (2.4 cm vs 1.7 cm, p 0.001), and worse baseline pulmonary function. At 3 years, freedom from local recurrence was 90% (95% CI 82-94%) for surgery and 85% (95% CI 65-94%) for SBRT (p = 0.71). While overall survival and disease-free survival were higher in the surgical cohort, no differences were noted in cancer-specific disease-free survival (60% vs. 65%, p = 0.84). On multivariate analysis, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.19-1.61, p 0.001) and lower diffusion capacity (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98, p 0.001) were independently associated with inferior overall survival. No differences in overall survival between surgery and SBRT (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74-1.95, p = 0.46) were observed after correcting for baseline imbalances in prognostic factors.SBRT and sublobar resection provided similar rates of local tumor control and overall clinical outcomes in stage I NSCLC.

We developed a novel localization technique for small intrapulmonary lesions using radiofrequency identification (RFID) technology. Micro-RFID markers with nickel-titanium coils were designed to be placed from subsegmental bronchi to the peripheral parenchyma. In this preclinical study, thoracoscopic subsegmentectomy of a canine pseudotumor model was performed to demonstrate the feasibility and three-dimensional positional accuracy of the system. To recover subcentimeter pseudotumors, markers were bronchoscopically placed to determine the resection line: (1) next to the pseudotumor; (2) in the responsible subsegmental bronchi as the central margin; and (3) on the intersubsegmental plane as the lateral margin. Specific marker positions were located by wireless communication using a wand-shaped probe with a 30-mm communication range, with the distance to the marker indicated by gradual changes in sound pitch. Thirty-four markers were placed for 10 pseudotumors (14.6 mm from the pleura) in 10 canines. Three markers were placed at a mean distance of 5.5 mm from the pseudotumors, and 11 central and 20 lateral markers were placed at mean distances of 17.2 and 20.7 mm from the pseudotumors, respectively. Central markers (20.5 mm from the pleura) were detected within 16.0 seconds in 2.9-mm-diameter bronchi. All resection stumps were within 5.4 mm (range 2-8 mm) from each marker, and pseudotumors were removed with adequate surgical margins toward the central (11.5 mm; range 7-16 mm) and lateral (12.4 mm; range 9-17 mm) directions. RFID wireless markers provided precise three-dimensional positional information and are a potential viable alternative to conventional markers.

Background While lepidic-predominant lung adenocarcinomas are known to have better outcomes than similarly sized solid tumors, the impact of smaller noninvasive foci within predominantly solid tumors is less clearly characterized. We tested the hypothesis that lung adenocarcinomas with even a small ground-glass opacity (GGO) component have a better prognosis than otherwise similar pure solid (PS) adenocarcinomas. Patients and Methods The maximum total and solid-component diameters were determined by preoperative computed tomography in patients who underwent lobar or sublobar resection of clinical N0 adenocarcinomas without induction therapy between May 2003 and August 2013. Survival between patients with PS tumors (0% GGO) or tumors with a minor ground-glass (MGG) component (1%-25% GGO) was compared by Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses. Results A total of 123 patients met the inclusion criteria, comprising 54 PS (44%) and 69 MGG (56%) whose mean ground-glass component was 18 ± 7%. The solid component tumor diameter was not significantly different between the groups (2.3 ± 1.2 cm vs. 2.5 ± 1.3 cm, P = .2). Upstaging to pN1-2 was more common for the PS group (13% [7/54] vs. 3% [2/69], P = .04), but the distribution of pathologic stage was not significantly different between the groups (PS 76% stage I [41/54] vs. MGG 80% stage I [55/69], P = .1). Having a MGG component was associated with markedly better survival in both univariate analysis (MGG 5-year overall survival 86.7% vs. PS 64.5%, P = .001) and multivariable survival analysis (hazard ratio, 0.30, P = .01). Conclusion Patients with resected cN0 lung adenocarcinoma who have even a small GGO component have markedly better survival than patients with PS tumors, which may have implications for both treatment and surveillance strategies.

This article addresses technical details of uniportal VATS segmentectomy by lung segments, suggesting available techniques for lesion localization and identification of the intersegmental plane. Long-term results and superiority have not yet been characterized in standard VATS for lung malignancy. Indications include almost all thoracic procedures currently performed by conventional multiport VATS. We review our experience and published literature on the feasibility of uniportal VATS segmentectomy.

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer traditionally is treated with lobectomy. Sublobar resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy provide alternative treatments for higher-risk groups. The purpose of this study was to determine the national treatment trends for stage I lung cancer.The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer between 1998 and 2012. Patients were compared across treatment groups, and trends in treatment and disease were evaluated over the 15-year time period.The National Cancer Database contained 369,931 patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. After removing patients who received chemotherapy as a first course of treatment and patients with pathologic stage IV, 357,490 patients were analyzed. The first recorded cases of stereotactic body radiation therapy are in 2003 and rapidly increased to 6.6% (2063) of all patients treated in 2012. The number of diagnoses of stage I non-small cell lung cancer steadily increased over the 15-year period, whereas the rate of lobectomy decreased from 55% in 1998 to 50% in 2012 (P .001). Most of the decrease in lobectomy can be explained by the increase in the rate of sublobar resection from 12% to 17% (P .001). The percentage of untreated patients remained stable at approximately 7% (P = .283).Although the number of stage I non-small cell lung cancer cases continues to increase, lobectomy rates are decreasing while sublobar resection and stereotactic body radiation therapy rates are increasing. Although the increasing popularity of alternative therapies to lobectomy for treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer should allow more patients to undergo treatment, we did not observe this trend in the data.

Despite a prospective randomized trial that reported decreased locoregional recurrence for the intentional use of sublobar resection for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, it continues to be a point of considerable debate. Improved imaging techniques have introduced a large group of smaller and more indolent tumors than what was studied 20 years ago by the Lung Cancer Study Group. Multiple single-institution and population-based analyses suggest that sublobar resections may have equivalent outcomes to lobectomy in well-selected patients with small (

Purpose To update brachytherapy recommendations for pretreatment evaluation, treatment, and dosimetric issues for thoracic brachytherapy for lung cancer. Methods and Materials Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in thoracic brachytherapy updated recommendations for thoracic brachytherapy based on literature review and clinical experience. Results The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines recommend the use of endobronchial brachytherapy for disease palliation in patients with central obstructing lesions, particularly in patients who have previously received external beam radiotherapy. The use of interstitial implants after incomplete resection may improve outcomes and provide enhanced palliation. Early reports support the use of CT-guided intratumoral volume implants within clinical studies. The use of brachytherapy routinely after sublobar resection is not generally recommended, unless within the confines of a clinical trial or a registry. Conclusions American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for thoracic brachytherapy are provided. Practitioners are encouraged to follow these guidelines and to develop further clinical trials to examine this treatment modality to increase the evidence base for its use.

There is renewed interest in performing segmentectomies and wedge resections for selected patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, comparative data on sublobar resections versus lobectomies include 'intentionally selected' patients who could tolerate either procedure, or 'compromised' patients who could only undergo sublobar resections due to significant comorbidities or insufficient cardiopulmonary reserve. To address this important point, the present meta-analysis aimed to compare the survival outcomes of sublobar resections and segmentectomies versus lobectomies based on patient selection and surgical intent.A systematic review was performed using 6 online databases to identify all comparative studies that presented survival data on sublobar resections versus lobectomy procedures. These studies were then categorized according to the patient selection process for those who underwent sublobar resections. Patients were considered 'intentionally selected' if they could have tolerated either procedure, 'compromised' if they underwent a sublobar resection due to ineligibility for a lobectomy, or 'non-specified'.Fifty-four studies, including a single randomized controlled trial, involving 38,959 patients were found to meet the predefined selection criteria. For sublobar resections, comparative data demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival in the 'intentionally selected' group, but a significantly worse outcome for sublobar resections in the 'compromised group'. Similarly, for the comparison of segmentectomies versus lobectomies, available data demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival in the 'intentionally selected' group, but a significantly worse outcome for segmentectomy in the 'compromised group'.The present meta-analysis was the first to emphasize the patient selection process to compare 'intentionally selected' and 'compromised' patients who underwent sublobar resections versus lobectomies. Our results suggested that segmentectomies may be a feasible alternative for selected patients who could tolerate either procedure. These patients generally had tumours that were2cm, located peripherally with favourable histopathology, and with ground-glass opacity on imaging.

Stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) is a promising alternative to lobectomy or sublobar resection for early lung cancer, but the value of SABR in comparison to surgical therapy remains debated. We examined the cost-effectiveness of SABR relative to surgery using SEER-Medicare data.Patients age ≥66 years with localized (5 cm) non-small cell lung cancers diagnosed from 2003-2009 were selected. Propensity score matching generated cohorts comparing SABR with either sublobar resection or lobectomy. Costs were determined via claims. Median survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were constructed from joint distribution of incremental costs and effects estimated by non-parametric bootstrap.In comparing SABR to sublobar resection, 5-year total costs were $55,120 with SABR vs. $77,964 with sublobar resection (P0.001) and median survival was 3.6 years with SABR vs. 4.1 years with sublobar resection (P=0.95). The ICER for sublobar resection compared to SABR was $45,683/life-year gained, yielding a 46% probability that sublobar resection is cost-effective. In comparing SABR to lobectomy, 5-year total costs were $54,968 with SABR vs. $82,641 with lobectomy (P0.001) and median survival was 3.8 years with SABR vs. 4.7 years with lobectomy (P=0.81). The ICER for lobectomy compared to SABR was $28,645/life-year gained, yielding a 78% probability that lobectomy is cost-effective.SABR is less costly than surgery. While lobectomy may be cost-effective compared to SABR, sublobar resection is less likely to be cost-effective. Assessment of the relative value of SABR versus surgical therapy requires further research.

Although the Lung Cancer Study Group published worse outcomes in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer who underwent sublobar resection, these data are fairly old and not reflective of the current patient population or surgical techniques. With the change in lung cancer pathology over these past few decades, our increased understanding of lung cancer and the era of screening for lung cancer, video-assisted thorascopic segmentectomy will likely play a greater role in the management of our patients.

Ultrasonography can be performed as an adjunct to aid in the localization of small nodules. We describe 25 patients with computed tomographic evidence of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) who underwent bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) for localization. The results demonstrate that methylene blue injection with radial EBUS is a simple and easy location technique for PLLs in Sublobar resection.

Sublobar resection (SLR) is an alternative to lobectomy for early non-small cell lung cancer. Comparative effectiveness of these 2 approaches might be modified by the extent of lymph node dissection.We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare dataset to identify patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer aged 66 years or older with tumor size ≤2 cm. We compared patient characteristics with t tests for continuous variables and χAmong 2757 lobectomies and 1229 SLR procedures performed for stage I tumors ≤2 cm, we propensity-matched 1124 patients from each group. Patients undergoing SLR were more likely to have no lymph nodes sampled (46.9% vs 6.4%; P .001). OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.69) and CSS (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.41-3.02) were worse following SLR. When propensity-matched cohorts of patients with at least 1 lymph node removed (n = 567 each group) were examined, the HRs for survival for SLR decreased (OS HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.12-1.69; CSS HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.97-2.57). Finally, when cohorts were propensity matched for ≥9 lymph nodes examined (n = 103 each group), there was no difference in OS (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50-1.39) or CSS (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.35-3.41).SLR leads to fewer lymph node removed and is associated with inferior survival compared with lobectomy. A more extensive lymphadenectomy may be associated with equivalent survival between matched patients undergoing SLR and lobectomy.

The Lung Cancer Study Group consensus recommending lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to reduce local recurrence associated with sublobar resections has directed NSCLC care since its 1995 publication. However, enhancements in imaging technology and in our understanding of the molecular biology of NSCLC over the past 2 decades have produced large cohorts of patients with smaller, better staged, and more indolent tumors than evaluated by the Lung Cancer Study Group. Numerous single-institution trials have demonstrated that in well-selected patients, sublobar resection can afford comparable survival and recurrence rates with lobectomy with a more favorable risk profile. This review of recent literature will focus on 2 separate issues with regard to the use of sublobar resections for stage I NSCLC: (1) a comparison to nonoperative ablative therapies in medically unfit patients, and (2) identifying in which subset of the noncompromised standard-risk population, sublobar resections provide equivalent outcome to lobectomy.

Background Surgical resection of bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors can be curative and remains the primary treatment modality. There are limited data to delineate the optimal extent of resection for this disease. Methods A retrospective review of the 3,270 patients diagnosed with typical and atypical carcinoid tumors between 2000 and 2007 in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry was performed. Results The mean follow-up period was 46 months (range, 1–95 mo). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival at 5 years was 80% and 90%, respectively. The mean OS was slightly better in the lobectomy group compared with those undergoing sublobar resection (86 vs 83 mo; P = .008). After adjusting for age, this finding was no longer present ( P = .513). By using multivariate analysis, sublobar resection was noninferior to lobectomy with regard to disease-specific survival and OS ( P Conclusions Compared with lobectomy, sublobar resection is associated with noninferior survival in patients with typical carcinoid of the lung.

It has been proved that lobectomy for lung cancer of less than 3 cm is superior to sublobar resection (segmentectomy and wedge resection) in the Lung Cancer Study Group trial published in 1995. Lobectomy is therefore recommended, with lymph node resection. Nevertheless, some publications have shown identical or close results after segmentectomy for tumors of less than 2 cm, and after wedge resection for tumors of less than 1 cm. It is likely that local recurrences are avoided by respecting a macroscopic margin of more than 2 cm around the tumor. A new trial comparing lobectomy and sublobar resection has been ongoing since 2007 for tumors of less than 2 cm. Persistent ground glass opacities are now often discovered after screening, either pure or with a small solid component, and correspond to an in situ or a micro-invasive adenocarcinoma, that can be removed with sublobar resection without recurrence.