Search

International audience; Background: Vaginal radical trachelectomy to preserve fertility in women with early stage cervical cancer was first described by Dargent in 1994. Nowadays, robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical is a new alternative. We want to share our first experience of robot-assisted radical trachelectomy.Technique: We report the case of a 28 years-old women with an early stage cervical cancer (1B1) and has a wish for preserved fertility (no anterior pregnancy). She undergoes a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. We divide the technique into 10 surgical steps.Experience: The duration of the surgery was : 4H30 with a bleeding < 100cc. The post operative period was simple without complications. Since the intervention, we perform 3 more robot-assisted radical trachelectomy. None of them have a complication during the surgery and the post operative period was simple.Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy is a safe and acurate technique. We want to share our recent experience by sharing this video. The surgeon in our hospipal are used to pratic robot-assisted laparoscopic. However, it was our first robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Thus we would like to demonstrate the feasibility and the reproducibility of this technique.

Objectives The role of additional surgery in patients responding to radiation and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of two groups of patients, with or without additional surgery. Study design One hundred and eleven patients with advanced cervical cancer who responded to chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy were included in a retrospective, multicenter series. Results Of the patients who had completion surgery (Group 1), 22.4% (15/67) had recurrence compared with 36.4% (16/44) of those who did not have surgery (Group 2). The difference is statistically significant ( p = 0.01). The relative risk of disease progression or death was 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.20–0.85) ( p = 0.01) in favor of completion surgery. After multivariate analysis, only age, pathology and initial tumor size remained significant (respectively p = 0.003, p = 0.001 and p = 0.03). Among the locations of recurrence in Group 1, 46.7% were pelvic (7/15) compared with 56.2% in Group 2 (9/16). In Group 1, 16.4% (11/67) of the patients died of disease compared to 20.4% (9/44) in Group 2. Of these, 45.4% (5/11) in Group 1 died after pelvic recurrence as compared to 77.8% (7/9) in Group 2. Conclusion Completion surgery does not improve OS but may improve DFS. There is no consensus regarding completion surgery in advanced cervical cancer with a good response to the standard treatment but we think it is safer to propose it.