Search

International audience; INTRODUCTION: Molecular profile of resected stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) would help refine prognosis and personalize induction or adjuvant strategies. We sought to report the molecular profile of resected stage I-II NSCLC and analyzed the impact of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations on outcomes in a Western population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical cases were identified from Biomarkers France study, a nationwide prospective study including NSCLC patients screened for EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ALK alterations from 2012 to 2013. Among surgical patients, clinical charts of the largest centers were reviewed in order to analyze the prognostic impact of EGFR mutations. RESULTS: In the BMF database (n = 17.636), surgical patients (n = 854) were characterized by a higher proportion of EGFR mutations than nonsurgical patients (12.9% vs. 10.2%, P = .025), while the other molecular alterations did not differ. The proportion of EGFR mutations was 27% in women undergoing surgery. In the study group (n = 293; EGFR wild type, n = 235; usual mutation, n = 50; rare mutation, n = 8), after a median follow-up of 67 months, 215 patients (74.4%) had not relapsed. No difference was found between EGFR-mutant and EGFR-wt tumors regarding recurrence site, disease-free survival, and overall survival. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival after surgical resection of stage I-II EGFR-mutated tumors were 65% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In resected stage I to II NSCLC, EGFR mutations were found in 12.9% of cases, associated with a 5-year overall survival of 75%, with no impact on recurrence site, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant, relatively immune-cold, and deadly subtype of lung cancer. SCLC has been viewed as a single or homogenous disease that includes deletion or inactivation of the two major tumor suppressor genes (TP53 and RB1) as a key hallmark. However, recent sightings suggest the complexity of SCLC tumors that comprises highly dynamic multiple subtypes contributing to high intratumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, the absence of targeted therapies, the understudied tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), and subtype plasticity are also responsible for therapy resistance. Secretory chemokines play a crucial role in immunomodulation by trafficking immune cells to the tumors. Chemokines and cytokines modulate the anti-tumor immune response and wield a pro-/anti-tumorigenic effect on SCLC cells after binding to cognate receptors. In this review, we summarize and highlight recent findings that establish the role of chemokines in SCLC growth and metastasis, and sophisticated intratumor heterogeneity. We also discuss the chemokine networks that are putative targets or modulators for augmenting the anti-tumor immune responses in targeted or chemo-/immuno-therapeutic strategies, and how these combinations may be utilized to conquer SCLC.

To determine the association of SOX2 with the prognosis in lung cancer, studies providing survival information were selected based on multivariate Cox regression analysis.PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible studies before June 19, 2021. The hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the prognostic impact of SOX2 based on multivariate Cox regression analysis. Publication bias was used to assess the risk of bias. Functional analysis of SOX2 was also conducted.13 studies with a total of 2008 patients with lung cancer were included. SOX2 expression was not correlated with overall survival in lung cancer (10 studies with 1591 cases). Between-study heterogeneity was noted (ISOX2 may be an independent prognostic factor in time-to-progression and recurrence-free survival and may become a promising therapeutic target. More studies are essential to further our findings.

Severe pneumonitis (≥ grade 3 by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) is a toxicity associated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), which is the standard first-line treatment for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). We summarize and quantify the risk of pneumonitis in LS-SCLC patients receiving first-line CCRT. A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and non-randomized trials between 2014 to July 16, 2020. The primary outcome was incidence of pneumonitis. Thirteen studies were included in the SLR and 1539 pooled patients from 10 studies were included in the base-case meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis was 3.28% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52%-5.04%) in RCTs, and 6.34% (95% CI: 3.64%-9.04%) in non-RCTs. The pooled incidence risk of grade 5 (fatal) pneumonitis was 0.29% (95% CI: 0.00%-0.62%) in RCTs and 0.88% (95% CI: 0.02%-1.74%) in non-RCT. Results from sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base-case analysis. The results from this analysis show that the incidence of ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in patients with LS-SCLC was 3.28% to 6.34%. The incidence of pneumonitis was higher in studies conducted in non-RCTs compared to RCTs. These results can be used to understand the safety, with regard to pneumonitis, of novel therapeutic agents when administered with CCRT to treat patients with LS-SCLC. To summarize and quantify the risk of pneumonitis in LS-SCLC patients receiving first-line CCRT, a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines.

Extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with poor prognosis. Recently, anlotinib has demonstrated significant clinical activity as a third-line or further on treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of anlotinib and platinum-etoposide as first-line treatment in patients with ES-SCLC.The present multi-center, single-arm, prospective study (NCT04684017) was conducted at three Chinese sites, and included patients with asymptomatic metastasis in the central nervous system. Patients were treated with up to six cycles of chemotherapy comprising etoposide with either carboplatin or cisplatin on day 1 of each cycle. Anlotinib was administered orally once daily on days 1-14 per cycle. The primary end points of the study were safety and investigator assessed objective response rate (ORR).A total of 101 patients were screened from August 2018 to September 2021, of which 86 who had received at least one dose of the treatment were included in the formal analysis. The median follow-up duration was 27.9 months. Complete response and partial response were observed in 2 and 73 patients, respectively, with an ORR of 87.2 % and a disease control rate of 97.7 %. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) events occurred in 78 and 47 patients, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 9.0 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 7.5-10.5) and 19 (95 % CI: 16.7-21.3) months, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was 58.1 % and 24 patients (27.9 %) experienced serious treatment-related AEs. No fatalities consequent to AEs were recorded.Given its promising efficacy, safety profile and durability, anlotinib combined with chemotherapy deserves further investigation as first-line anticancer therapy in ES-SCLC (NCT: 04684017).

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a clinically common malignant tumor originating from the lung neuroendocrine stem cells, which has a poor prognosis and accounts for approximately 15% of all lung cancer cases. However, research on its treatment has been slow, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with SCLC has been 5% for many years. In recent years, the development and popularization of gene sequencing technology have facilitated the understanding of the gene mutation landscape and tumor evolution of SCLC, thereby leading to a more accurate prediction of the prognosis of SCLC and the development of individualized treatment. In this review, we aimed to discuss the mutation evolution of SCLC from the perspective of a tumor evolution theory and described the sequence of mutation evolution in the occurrence and development of SCLC. In addition, we summarized the existing whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of SCLC cases at our center along with relevant publications on sequencing. Thereafter, we discuss the role of different mutated pathways in the occurrence of SCLC to predict its prognosis more accurately and summarized individualized treatment strategies.

Treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has not changed significantly compared to the overwhelming development of targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer. However, recent epigenetic and expressional analyses have revealed that SCLC can be divided into four distinct subtypes, which may lead to precision treatments. The situation appears slightly similar to the "four-color problem," a classic mathematical problem stating that no more than four colors are required to color the regions so that no two adjacent areas have the same color. This review introduces the framework for subtyping SCLC into four molecular subtypes and the promising targeted treatment for each subtype.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive lung cancer subtype and its first-line treatment has remained unchanged for decades. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a therapeutic strategy for tumor treatment, whereas, patients with SCLC exhibit poor overall responses to immunotherapy alone, which highlights the necessity for combinatorial approaches. The tumor microenvironment (TME), an integral component in cancer, is widely implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor metastasis. The interactions of various cells within TME shape the adverse conditions of the tumor microenvironment (characterized by hypoxia, nutrient restriction, and acidity) and are considered responsible for the modest therapeutic responses to immunotherapy. Several studies have suggested that adverse TME can regulate immune cell activation and function. However, the specific regulatory mechanisms and their implications on immunotherapy remain unclear. Thus, it is worth unraveling the characteristics of TME and its impact on antitumor immunity, in the hope of devising novel strategies to reinforce immunotherapeutic effects on SCLC. In this review, we firstly elaborate on the immune landscape of SCLC and the formation of three remarkable characteristics in TME, as well as the interaction among them. Next, we summarize the latest findings regarding the impacts of adverse TME on immune cells and its targeted therapy in SCLC. Finally, we discuss the ongoing trials in combination therapy and potential directions of SCLC therapy. Collectively, the findings combined here are expected to aid the design of trials for combining immunotherapy with therapy targeting the TME of SCLC.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), originating from lung neuroendocrine stem cells, is a common pulmonary malignant tumor. SCLC, with poor prognoses, accounts for approximately 13-15% of all lung cancer cases. Due to the slow progress of clinical treatment, the 5-year survival rate of SCLC has remained below 7% for many years. In recent years, with the development and popularity of gene sequencing technologies, we were able to better grasp patterns of gene mutations and tumor evolution in SCLC. Thus, appropriate molecular subtyping strategies have been established to help predict patients' prognoses and develop the treatment regimen for SCLC more accurately. In this narrative review, we aim to summarize the evolution of mutation-based molecular subtyping of SCLC, as well as the trends in molecular targeting and immunotherapeutic for SCLC. Based on the latest sequencing data for SCLC, thereafter, we discuss therapeutic opinions of SCLC from basic to clinic. This review may provide a basis for guiding the development of subsequent individualized precision-targeted therapy for SCLC patients to improve their clinical prognoses.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an extremely aggressive neuroendocrine tumor, accounting for approximated 13% of all lung cancer cases. SCLC is characterized by rapid growth and early metastasis. Despite marked improvements in the number and efficacy of targeted, therapeutic options and overall survival rates in SCLC have remained nearly unchanged for almost three decades. The lack of significant progress can be attributed to our poor understanding of the biology of SCLC. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors were recently approved as front-line therapies for SCLC, we still need to better understand the mechanisms responsible for the selective vulnerability of some SCLCs to these inhibitors. Recent work utilizing sequencing data and single cell analyses identified four distinct subsets of SCLC, based on the expression levels of the transcription factors ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3 and YAP1. Each subset was found to have its own distinct biology and therapeutic vulnerabilities. However, these subsets appear to be phenotypically unstable, representing snapshots in the gradual evolution of a tumor that exhibits significant plasticity. Tumor evolution, a product of this plasticity, results in the emergence of significant intratumoral heterogeneity which plays an important role in multiple aspects of SCLC development and progression, including cell survival and proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis. The recent paradigm shifting discoveries in the biology of SCLC are now beginning to inform the design of new therapeutic strategies for the management of this intractable disease.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly lethal subtype of lung cancer with a particularly poor prognosis. For decades, the best available systemic therapy was platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy, which offered frequent but transient responses. Survival gains were finally realized with the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to first-line chemotherapy. The phase III IMpower 133 trial showed that the addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy improved survival. The subsequent CASPIAN trial demonstrated a similar benefit with durvalumab. These results quickly established chemo-immunotherapy as the preferred initial treatment for advanced SCLC, but outcomes remain poor for most patients. Here, we review the current and evolving role of immunotherapy in SCLC and outline emerging strategies poised to further elevate the standard of care.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive tumor, and despite its sensitivity to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients usually have a short survival. There are no clinically relevant predictive factors of responses to therapies, and therapeutic options are still limited.Clinical data and somatic mutations of genes included in the MSK-IMPACT panel were retrieved from cBioPortal for 108 SCLCs and analyzed to identify mutated gene networks. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 54 SCLCs, whose information was also available from cBioPortal.Different networks were observed in tumors of short and long survivors. Degree (K) and betweenness (B) are key features that characterize a gene in its network of related mutations. By comparing their B/K ratio, 2 signatures of mutated genes were identified, describing short (IL-7R, NTRK2, HNF-1A) and long survivors (NBN, PTPN-11, IRS-1, INPP-4A, PIK-3CG, HGF, LATS-2, SMARCA-4, FLT-3, EIF-4A2, SPEN, PAX-5, SH2-D1A, ARID-1A, HOXB-13, ERCC-4, FANCA, FH, FGFR-2, MST-1R, SMAD-4, DDR-2, IGF-1R, PIK-3CB). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the short signature had a worse median overall survival of 8 versus 28 months (P.001). Patients with at least 1 mutated gene of the long signature had a better median overall survival of 39 versus 20 months (P = .004). The value of the short signature was further confirmed in an independent cohort of SCLCs.The networks of mutated genes could help subclassify SCLCs based on their somatic mutations and aid in identifying a subset of tumors with poor prognosis.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a particular subtype of lung cancer with high mortality. Recent advances in understanding SCLC genomics and breakthroughs of immunotherapy have substantially expanded existing knowledge and treatment modalities. However, challenges associated with SCLC remain enigmatic and elusive. Most of the conventional drug discovery approaches targeting altered signaling pathways in SCLC end up in the ‘grave-yard of drug discovery’, which mandates exploring novel approaches beyond inhibiting cell signaling pathways. Epigenetic modifications have long been documented as the key contributors to the tumorigenesis of almost all types of cancer, including SCLC. The last decade witnessed an exponential increase in our understanding of epigenetic modifications for SCLC. The present review highlights the central role of epigenetic regulations in acquiring neoplastic phenotype, metastasis, aggressiveness, resistance to chemotherapy, and immunotherapeutic approaches of SCLC. Different types of epigenetic modifications (DNA/histone methylation or acetylation) that can serve as predictive biomarkers for prognostication, treatment stratification, neuroendocrine lineage determination, and development of potential SCLC therapies are also discussed. We also review the utility of epigenetic targets/epidrugs in combination with first-line chemotherapy and immunotherapy that are currently under investigation in preclinical and clinical studies. Altogether, the information presents the inclusive landscape of SCLC epigenetics and epidrugs that will help translate the knowledge of epigenetics to improve SCLC outcomes.

The newly released eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for lung cancer seeks to improve prognostic accuracy but lacks external validation for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Moreover, previous studies posed a few questions concerning survival differences for patients with specific site N3 node involvement or single-site metastasis (SSM) in different distant organs. The aim of this study was to validate the eighth edition of the TNM classification for SCLC in an independent multi-institutional cohort from China and answer the questions raised by the previous research.Patients with SCLC from four Chinese cancer centers between 2009 and 2019 were reclassified according to the seventh and eighth edition of the TNM classification. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between adjacent categories and stage groups were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression. R2 statistics were calculated to evaluate the discriminating performance of editions.Of 3384 enrolled cases, 3358 had clinical stage, 537 had pathological stage, and 511 had both. Progressive deterioration of survival was observed with advancing of TNM categories and stages both in the seventh and the eighth edition. The eighth edition stages had a higher R2 statistic than the seventh edition (0.207 versus 0.197). Newly defined categories M1b and M1c and stages IIIC, IVA and IVB in the eighth edition discriminated groups with significantly different prognosis. Patients with N3 contralateral supraclavicular nodes had a significantly worse prognosis than those without (p = 0.032). For patients with single-site metastasis, liver involvement showed a worse prognosis compared to brain involvement (p = 0.030).Our study provided an external validation of the eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer in Chinese patients with SCLC, and confirmed its improved prognostic accuracy compared with the seventh edition. Patients with N3 and M1b might represent heterogeneous populations that warrant further research.

Assess Once daily (OD) chemoradiation effectiveness for LS-SCLC compared with twice daily (BID) chemoradiation.Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, eligible randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing OD and BID were identified on electronic databases. A meta-analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. A metaregression analysis was conducted to explore the influence of fractionation, biological effective dose (BED), the proportion of patients treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), elective nodal irradiation (ENI), and the start of radiotherapy (week 1 or week 4).Five RCTs with a total of 1941 patients (OD vs. BID) were included. The relative risk (RR) for OS and PFS was 0.97 (CI95% 0.8-1.1, p = 0.731) and 0.90 (CI95% 0.7-1.1, p = 0.20) at 3-years. In the metaregression analysis, hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules were associated with an improvement in overall survival (p = 0.03). The start of radiotherapy (W1 or W4), BED, and ENI had no significant effect on OS and PFS. The complete response rate partial response and overall response rate for BID vs OD were 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.97), 50% vs. 57% (p = 0.94), and 89% vs. 93% (p = 0.99). The rate of completed planned RT 96% vs. 94% (p = 0.66), and the % of ≥4 chemotherapy cycles received 74% vs. 74% (p = 0.99), did not differ between OD and BID. The local and distant failure rates were not significantly different between OD and BID 40% vs. 33% (p = 0.88) and 36% vs. 36% (p = 0.99). No difference in grade 2 or grade 3 pneumonitis and esophagitis was observed among the groups (p = NS).For LS-SCLC, OD conventional chemoradiation results in similar outcomes to BID chemoradiation. In contrast, hypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with a better OS and PFS than BID. Additional randomized phase III trials exploring hypofractionation with systemic therapy are warranted to validate our findings.

Background The United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend that patients and professionals make shared decisions between surgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) when treating early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Variation by centre suggests treatment decisions may be disproportionately influenced by clinician judgment and treatment availability rather than patient preference. This systematic review critically evaluates studies of patient and clinician preferences for treatment of early stage NSCLC. Methods Primary empirical research up to 30 April 2020 was identified from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Web of Science databases. Data extracted included: study characteristics and methods, preferences for NSCLC treatment and involvement in decision-making and risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were synthesized using descriptive data and narrative synthesis. Results 23 studies were included in the review; 18 measured patient preferences, 4 clinician preferences and 1 both clinician and patient preferences. Patients and clinicians were both most likely to prefer a collaborative role in treatment decisions. Most patients did not recall there being a choice between surgery or SABR options, and thus experienced minimal decisional conflict. Conclusions For professionals to support patients in making informed, value based decisions about NSCLC treatments, better quality evidence is needed of the clinical and quality of life trade offs for both surgery and SABR.

The prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) has already been evaluated in a wide range of malignancies including patients with non-surgically managed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, the impact of LMR on survival in surgically treated SCLC patients has not yet been assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical role of LMR in patients undergoing surgical resection for SCLC.In this retrospective study, individuals receiving radical surgery for SCLC between January 2000 and December 2019 from three participating European institutions were included. LMR was calculated from the most recent blood test prior to surgery. Optimal cut-off values for LMR were determined and correlated with clinical data and survival outcomes.In total, 101 patients underwent surgical resection for SCLC during the study period. 76 (75.2%) received anatomic lung resection (defined as lobectomy or pneumonectomy), 63 (62.4%) were male and the median age was 63 (range 41-80) years. LMR 2.50 significantly associated with improved overall survival (OS) (35.3 vs. 20.7 months, p = 0.032) and disease-free survival (DFS) (25.8 vs 18.5 months, p = 0.011). Moreover, multivariate Cox proportional hazard model identified LMR 2.50 as an independent prognostic factor of longer OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.617; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.383-0.993; p = 0.047) and DFS (HR 0.505; 95% CI 0.266-0.959; p = 0.037).Preoperatively elevated LMR is a robust prognostic factor associated with improved OS and DFS in patients undergoing surgery for SCLC. Further studies are warranted to better understand the overall impact of LMR when applying surgery in these patients.

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are at high risk for intracranial metastatic disease (IMD). Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has supplanted whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as first-line treatment for IMD in most solid cancers, WBRT remains first-line treatment for IMD in patients with SCLC. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of SRS in comparison with WBRT and assess treatment outcomes following SRS.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and grey literature sources for controlled trials and cohort studies published in English reporting on SRS for IMD treatment in patients with SCLC from inception to March 23, 2022. Studies were excluded that did not report on SRS for IMD secondary to SCLC. Summary data were extracted. The primary outcome was overall survival, presented as pooled hazard ratios (HR) through random-effects meta-analysis for studies comparing SRS with WBRT with or without SRS boost, and as medians for single-arm SRS studies. This study is registered with the Open Science Framework, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8M4HC, and PROSPERO, CRD42021258197.Of 3823 identified records, 31 were eligible for inclusion; seven were included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival following SRS was longer than following WBRT with or without SRS boost (HR 0·85; 95% CI 0·75-0·97; n=7 studies; n=18 130 patients), or WBRT alone (0·77; 0·72-0·83; n=7 studies; n=16 961 patients), but not WBRT plus SRS boost (1·17, 0·78-1·75; n=4 studies; n=1167 patients). Using single-arm studies, pooled median overall survival from SRS was 8·99 months (95% CI 7·86-10·16; n=14 studies; n=1682 patients). Between-study heterogeneity was considerable when pooled among all comparative studies (IThese results suggest survival outcomes are equitable following treatment with SRS compared with WBRT in patients with SCLC and IMD. Future prospective studies should focus on tumour burden and differences in local and distant intracranial progression between WBRT-treated and SRS-treated patients with SCLC.None.

Although recent reports have revealed the importance of the inactivation of both RB1 and TP53 in the transformation from lung adenocarcinoma into neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), the requirements for complete transformation into NEC have not been elucidated. To investigate alterations in the characteristics associated with the inactivation of RB1/TP53 and define the requirements for transformation into NEC cells, RB1/TP53 double-knockout A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells were established, and additional knockout of REST and transfection of ASCL1 and POU class 3 homeobox transcription factors (TFs) was conducted. More than 60 genes that are abundantly expressed in neural cells and several genes associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition were up-regulated in RB1/TP53 double-knockout A549 cells. Although the expression of chromogranin A and synaptophysin was induced by additional knockout of REST (which mimics the status of most NECs), the expression of another neuroendocrine marker, CD56, and proneural TFs was not induced. However, coexpression of ASCL1 and POU3F4 in RB1/TP53/REST triple-knockout A549 cells induced the expression of not only CD56 but also other proneural TFs (NEUROD1 and insulinoma-associated 1) and induced NEC-like morphology. These findings suggest that the inactivation of RB1 and TP53 induces a state necessary for the transformation of lung adenocarcinoma into NEC and that further inactivation of REST and coexpression of ASCL1 and POU3F4 are the triggers for complete transformation into NEC.

BACKGROUND: The long-term risk of cardiovascular outcomes from either stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) plus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to treat early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is largely unknown. As continued adoption of SBRT accelerates, it is important to delineate unforeseen cardiovascular risks associated with treatment. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the long-term risk of cardiovascular outcomes for patients with early stage NSCLC treated with either SBRT or 3DCRT plus IMRT differ by tumor laterality? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry linked to Medicare was analyzed to identify a sample of 3,256 patients (1,506 treated with SBRT and 1,750 treated with 3DCRT plus IMRT) with node-negative stage I or IIA NSCLC. Cardiovascular events were identified using diagnosis codes, and outcomes were compared between left- and right-sided tumors. We assumed that tumor laterality was random and that the radiation field for left-sided tumors likely would result in greater dose to cardiac tissues. Cox regression models were fit to quantify the association of laterality on outcomes. RESULTS: Patients were followed up for a median of 2 years. Those treated with SBRT showed no difference in hazard of any cardiovascular outcomes by tumor laterality, including the cardiovascular composite (hazard ratio [HR] comparing left- vs right-sided tumors, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84-1.15). In contrast, patients treated with 3DCRT plus IMRT showed a greater risk of congestive heart failure (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48) and percutaneous coronary artery intervention (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.47). INTERPRETATION: Patients with left- vs right-sided early stage NSCLC showed similar rates of cardiovascular events when treated with SBRT. However, these patients also showed higher rates of select cardiac events when they were treated with 3DCRT plus IMRT. This study provides evidence that SBRT may provide a safer option over 3DCRT plus IMRT for patients with left-sided early stage NSCLC and underscores the need for long-term follow-up for patients treated with radiation therapy.

Malignant cell populations in a tumor often exist in distinct phenotypic states. Deciphering tumor heterogeneity requires determining how many such unique states exist and what the biological traits associated with each are. Archetype analysis of SCLC transcriptomes reveals key phenotypic states in SCLC tumors and their patterns of evolution.

MICROABSTRACT: We evaluated the association of operability status with early post-treatment mortality among patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy. In this cohort study of 80,108 patients from a large US cancer dataset, operable patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy experienced

This study compared the overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus surgery.A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and all available Chinese databases to identify relevant publications from inception to April 2019. This meta-analysis compared hazard ratios (HRs) for OS. A multivariate fixed effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis to compare survival between treatments.Six retrospective studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with surgery, RFA was associated with a similar long-term OS. The HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 2-, 3- and 5-year OS were 1.74 [0.82, 3.71], 1.15 [0.65, 2.02] and 2.69 [0.41, 17.47], respectively, while those of the pooled data were 1.47 [0.94, 2.32] in patients with early-stage primary NSCLC.RFA did not differ significantly from surgery in terms of the 5-year OS in patients with early-stage primary NSCLC. Randomized, controlled clinical trials are warranted to compare these two treatments.

For patients with resectable, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery is the primary treatment; however, 5-year survival rates remain poor. Postoperative adjuvant platinum-doublet chemotherapy is associated with a statistically significant but modest improvement in survival of ∼5% at 5 years and is widely accepted as standard of care in patients with resectable, Stage II-III NSCLC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with similar improvements in overall survival to adjuvant therapy in this setting. Durvalumab, a high-affinity PD-L1 inhibitor, has become the standard of care for patients with unresectable, Stage III NSCLC following chemoradiotherapy based on improved progression-free and overall survival in the phase III PACIFIC trial. AEGEAN is a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international study that will assess pathological and clinical outcomes of durvalumab plus chemotherapy prior to surgery, followed by durvalumab monotherapy after surgery in adults with resectable, Stage II-III NSCLC. Approximately 800 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive durvalumab or placebo every 3 weeks (q3w) alongside platinum-based chemotherapy (≤4 cycles) prior to surgery, followed by durvalumab or placebo monotherapy q4w, for an additional 12 cycles post surgery, stratified by disease stage (IASLC 8th Edition, Stage II vs. Stage III) and PD-L1 tumor cell expression levels (

BackgroundPatients undergoing surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be at high risk for postoperative mortality. Access to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may facilitate more appropriate patient selection for surgery.Research questionIs postoperative mortality associated with early stage NSCLC lower at facilities with higher use of SBRT?Study design and methodsPatients with early stage NSCLC reported to the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015 were included. Use of SBRT was defined by each facility's SBRT experience (in years) and SBRT to surgery volume ratios. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for the associations between SBRT use and postoperative mortality.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 202,542 patients who underwent surgical resection of cT1-T2N0M0 NSCLC tumors. The 90-day postoperative mortality rate declined during the study period from 4.6%to 2.6%(P< .001), the proportion of facilities that used SBRT increased from 4.6%to 77.5%(P< .001), and the proportion of patients treated with SBRT increased from 0.7%to 15.4%(P< .001). On multivariate analysis, lower 90-day postoperative mortality rates were observed at facilities with > 6 years of SBRT experience (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94; P= .003) and SBRT to surgery volume ratios of more than 17%(OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92; P< .001). Ninety-day mortality also was associated with surgical volume, region, year, age, sex, and race, among other covariates. Interaction testing between these covariates showed negative results.InterpretationPatients who underwent resection for early stage NSCLC at facilities with higher SBRT use showed lower rates of postoperative mortality. These findings suggest that the availability and use of SBRT may improve the selection of patients for surgery who are predicted to be at high risk of postoperative mortality.

Background Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been widely used in the surgical treatment of thoracic diseases, and it suggested surgical and oncological advantages compared with open surgery. However, reports on the application of VATS in surgery of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are scarce. This study aimed to explore the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical approaches in the treatment of pathological stage T1(pT1) SCLC in terms of safety, clinical outcomes, and lymph node dissection. Patients and Methods Patients who underwent lobectomy for pT1 SCLC between January 2014 and September 2017 were identified from the National Collaborative Lung Cancer Database (LinkDoc Database). The patients were stratified based on the surgery approach (VATS or open lobectomy). Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were analyzed using SPSS software. Results A total of 169 patients with pT1 SCLC met the criteria and were enrolled for this study, including 110 cases of VATS lobectomies and 59 cases of open lobectomies. VATS lobectomy was associated with less blood loss than open surgery (168.1 ± 237.4 vs. 340.0 ± 509.8 mL, P = .002). Open lobectomy harvested more N2 LNs (11.8 ± 8.2 vs. 8.4 ± 5.8, P = .048) and identified more metastasis positive LNs (3.1 ± 6.0 vs. 1.4 ± 3.0, P = .050). Open lobectomy associated with longer overall survival (OS) but has no statistical difference (23.4 ± 13.2 vs. 20.2 ± 10.9, P = .070). Conclusion Open lobectomy had better lymph node dissection results, and comparable postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and OS to VATS lobectomy. Further studies may still be needed to confirm the recommendation of thoracoscopic approach as a routine surgical procedure for operable SCLC, and until then, open surgery should still be considered.

Recent advances in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments necessitate a better understanding of real-world health utility scores (HUS) in patients treated under current standards to facilitate robust pharmaco-economic assessments.In this single institution cohort observational study, HUS were evaluated in patients with SCLC through EQ-5D questionnaires at outpatient visits (encounters). In addition, patients completed questionnaires relating to treatment toxicities and cancer symptoms. Clinical and pathological variables were abstracted from electronic medical records and disease status at each patient visit was documented. The impact of these variables on HUS were explored.There were 282 clinical encounters (12% newly diagnosed; 37% stable on treatment; 22% progressing on treatment; 29% stable off therapy/other) in 111 SCLC patients (58% male; 64% extensive stage (ES) SCLC). At the first encounter 29% of patients had an ECOG performance status (PS) ≥ 2. ES-SCLC, bone metastases, female sex, progressive disease and/or PS were each significantly associated with decreased HUS in multivariable analyses. Patients clinically stable on first line therapy had generally steady HUS longitudinally, with differences in HUS between limited disease (LD) and ES patients emerging as treatment progressed. Decreased HUS were associated with increased severity of the majority of measured symptoms (fatigue/tiredness, loss of appetite, pain, drowsiness, shortness of breath, anxiety, depression, and overall well-being; each p0.001), supporting the value of EQ-5D-derived HUS in assessing health utility.Our HUS values in chemotherapy-treated SCLC are clinically relevant and are associated with specific clinico-demographic, symptom and toxicity factors.

Herein are presented the recommendations from the Société française de radiothérapie oncologique regarding indications and modalities of lung cancer radiotherapy. The recommendations for delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk are detailed.

FRESC reanalyzed extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patient data from the French KBP-2010 cohort to describe the characteristics and therapeutic management of ES-SCLC and provide real-world estimates of survival.A target population of first line (1L) ES-SCLC was identified at initial diagnosis in KBP-2010 (KBP population, N = 796). A KBP-2010 subpopulation was defined as patients who also met the IMpower133 clinicaltrial PS ≤ 1 inclusion criteria (KBP-PS_0/1 population, N = 394). Subgroups were defined according to the 1L ES-SCLC chemotherapy regimens: carboplatin or cisplatin with etoposide (Carb-E or Cisp-E subgroups).The vast majority of KBP populations exhibited stage IV ES-SCLC (84.9%) at initial diagnosis. Median age was 66 years; patients were mostly male and smokers. Patients receiving Cisp + Eto were younger (median age 61 years [55.0-67.0]) and fitter (25.5% had PS ≥ 2) than those receiving Carb + Eto (71 years [62.5-77.5]; 44.1%had PS ≥ 2). Median overall survival (OS) of chemotherapy-treated 1L ES-SCLC patients varied from 7.0 months [95% CI, 6.1; 7.8] in the KBPCarb-Esubgroups to 9.6 months [95% CI, 8.4;10.8] in the KBP Cisp-E subgroup. KBP-PS_0/1 population showed better median OS, especially for the Cisp-E subgroup (10 months [95% CI, 8.7; 11.3]).In the KBP-PS_0/1 population, median OS was close to the one that was found in the IMpower133 control arm. Although this needs to be confirmed by further research, it suggests the transposability of the IMpower133 results to real-life conditions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The study objective was to determine whether longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were associated with survival among early-stage, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from January 2015 through March 2020. We ran a joint probability model to assess the relationship between time-to-death, and longitudinal PRO measurements. PROs were measured through the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). We controlled for other covariates likely to affect symptom burden and survival including stage, tumor diameter, comorbidities, gender, race/ethnicity, relationship status, age, and smoking status. RESULTS: The sample included 510 early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing SBRT. The median age was 73.8 (range: 46.3–94.6). The survival component of the joint model demonstrates that longitudinal changes in ESAS scores are significantly associated with worse survival (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02–1.05). This finding suggests a one-unit increase in ESAS score increased probability of death by 4%. Other factors significantly associated with worse survival included older age (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.03–1.05), larger tumor diameter (HR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.01–1.46), male gender (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.36–2.57), and current smoking status (HR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.25–4.56). CONCLUSION: PROs are increasingly being collected as a part of routine care delivery to improve symptom management. Healthcare systems can integrate these data with other real-world data to predict patient outcomes, such as survival. Capturing longitudinal PROs—in addition to PROs at diagnosis—may add prognostic value for estimating survival among early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing SBRT.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are rapidly establishing their place and have shown promising preliminary data in lung cancer with impressive response rates and survival outcomes in previously treated patients.There are several ADCs currently in clinical trials for NSCLC and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). These ADCs often have different targets which include HER2, HER3, TROP2, CEACAM5, and MET in NSCLC and DLL3 in SCLC.Here we review the safety, and efficacy of newer ADCs in lung cancer including ado-trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxetecan, patritomab deruxetecan, datopotamab deruxetecan, sacituzumab govitecan, SAR408701, Telisotuzumab vedotin, rovalpituzumab tesirine, lorvotuzumab mertansine, and sacituzumab govitecan. Several novel methods are underway to improve the safety and efficacy of ADCs which include increasing the drug to antibody ratio (DAR), the potency of the payload, using more innovative payloads and replacing the antibody.

This review summarizes key recent developments relevant to the pathologic diagnosis of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, including carcinoids, small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). Covered are recent insights into the biological subtypes within each main tumor type, progress in pathological diagnosis and immunohistochemical markers, and persistent challenging areas. Highlighted topics include highly proliferative carcinoids and their distinction from small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the evolving role of Ki67, the update on the differential diagnosis of NEC to include thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumors, the recent data on SCLC transcriptional subtypes with the emergence of POU2F3 as a novel marker for the diagnosis of SCLC with low/negative expression of standard neuroendocrine markers, and the update on the diagnosis of LCNEC, particularly in biopsies. There has been remarkable recent progress in the understanding of the genetic and expression-based profiles within each type of lung neuroendocrine neoplasm, and it is hoped that these insights will enable the development of novel diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers to aid in the pathologic assessment of these tumors in the future.

Objective Patients with very early stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) can benefit from surgery. However, the role of surgery in local advanced SCLC patients remains controversial. We designed this study to investigate the role of surgery on survival of this subset population. Methods The included patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER database from 1998 to 2016 and Shanghai Chest Hospital of China from 2009 to 2016. Propensity score matching(PSM) was used to balance clinical bias. The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared by the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival. Results Among the 3005 stage Ⅲ patients, 570 (18.97%) patients underwent surgery. Compared with non-surgical group, patients undergoing surgery were more likely to be male, had smaller tumor size, mediastinal lymph node involvement and lower pathologic stage. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that surgical patients had a better OS and LCSS before and after PSM. 418 surgical patients were well matched with non-surgical patients. In matched surgical group, there were 224 (53.59%) patients who underwent lobectomy (LB), 147 (35.17%) patients who received sublobectomy (SLB), 31 (7.41%) patients who underwent pneumonectomy and 16 (3.83%) patients with unknown surgery type. The 5-year OS of the 4 subgroups were 28.80%, 12.50%, 8.70% and 13.50%, respectively (P = 0.002). In a multivariable Cox model, SLB (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95%CI, 1.20–1.96; P = 0.001) and pneumonectomy (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95%CI, 1.12–2.65; P = 0.013) were associated with worse OS compared with LB. Conclusion Surgical resection significantly improved OS and LCSS of stage Ⅲ SCLC patients in our study. Furthermore, LB had advantage over other surgery type but further exploration in larger prospective clinical trials is needed.

Metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is not curable. While SCLC is initially sensitive to chemotherapy, remissions are short-lived. The relapse is induced by chemotherapy-selected tumor stem cells, which express the AC133 epitope of the CD133 stem cell marker. We studied the effectiveness of AC133-specific CAR T cells post-chemotherapy using human primary SCLC and an orthotopic xenograft mouse model. AC133-specific CAR T cells migrated to SCLC tumor lesions, reduced the tumor burden, and prolonged survival in a humanized orthotopic SCLC model, but were not able to entirely eliminate tumors. We identified CD73 and PD-L1 as immune-escape mechanisms and combined PD-1-inhibition and CD73-inhibition with CAR T cell treatment. This triple-immunotherapy induced cures in 25% of the mice, without signs of graft-versus-host disease or bone marrow failure. AC133+ cancer stem cells and PD-L1+CD73+ myeloid cells were detectable in primary human SCLC tissues, suggesting that patients may benefit from the triple-immunotherapy. We conclude that the combination of AC133-specific CAR T cells, anti-PD-1-antibody and CD73-inhibitor specifically eliminates chemo-resistant tumor stem cells, overcomes SCLC-mediated T cell inhibition, and might induce long-term complete remission in an otherwise incurable disease.

Background Conflicting data exists regarding the benefit of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We sought to retrospectively review outcomes of patients within our network with ES-SCLC treated with and without PCI between 2009 and 2020. Methods Endpoints assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator were overall survival (OS), freedom from death with uncontrolled intracranial disease (UI-DFS), brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), and symptomatic BMFS (SBMFS). Log-rank test was performed for univariate comparison of outcomes, with Cox regression performed for univariate and multivariable analysis of OS and UI-DFS. Results Some 250 patients were determined to be eligible for PCI based on any response to upfront chemotherapy, with 46 patients excluded owing to lack of negative staging brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Brain MRI was performed both at diagnosis and near completion of chemotherapy in 108 patients, with brain metastases identified near completion of chemotherapy in 17 patients (15.7%), excluding them from further analysis. Median OS in remaining eligible 187 patients was 9.0 months, with 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS of 21.9%. PCI was associated with improved UI-DFS, BMFS, and SBMFS. However, PCI was not associated with improved OS in the entire cohort or the propensity matched cohort. Conclusion Our study suggests screening with MRI following chemotherapy is important because of the identification of unsuspected brain metastases in nearly 16% of patients with response to chemotherapy. PCI is associated with reduction in brain metastases, without a demonstrable impact on OS in the era of MRI screening.

Objectives: Circulating levels of activin A (ActA) and follistatin (FST) have been investigated in various disorders including malignancies. However, to date, their diagnostic and prognostic relevance is largely unknown in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Our aim was to evaluate circulating ActA and FST levels as potential biomarkers in this devastating disease. Methods: Seventy-nine Caucasian SCLC patients and 67 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were included in this study. Circulating ActA and FST concentrations were measured by ELISA and correlated with clinicopathological parameters and long-term outcomes. Results: Plasma ActA and FST concentrations were significantly elevated in SCLC patients when compared to healthy volunteers (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, extensive-stage SCLC patients had significantly higher circulating ActA levels than those with limited-stage disease (p = 0.0179). Circulating FST concentration was not associated with disease stage (p = 0.6859). Notably, patients with high (≥548.8 pg/ml) plasma ActA concentration exhibited significantly worse median overall survival (OS) compared to those with low (

This first-in-human phase I study (NCT03179436) investigated anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 monoclonal antibody quavonlimab and anti-programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study was conducted in two parts: dose-escalation (part 1) and dose-confirmation (part 2). First-line treatment with quavonlimab + pembrolizumab conferred encouraging antitumor activity (objective response rate [ORR], 28%-40%) and was generally well tolerated (grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs] were lowest with quavonlimab 25 mg every 6 weeks [Q6W] at 30% and highest with quavonlimab 75 mg Q3W at 57%) in non-small cell lung cancer. We present data from patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving second-line or later therapy.Patients with stage III/IV SCLC received quavonlimab 75 mg Q6W plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤ 2 years. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; ORRs as assessed by blinded independent central review per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumorsv1.1 was a secondary endpoint. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the correlation of response with PD-L1 expression were exploratory endpoints.Forty patients with extensive-stage SCLC received treatment; median follow-up was 13 months. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 4 patients (10%). TRAEs occurred in 80% of patients; grade 3 events occurred in 33% of patients and no grade 4/5 events were reported. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 18% (7-33) among all patients, 7% (1-34) for PD-L1-positive tumors (n = 14), and 19% (5-42) for PD-L1-negative tumors (n = 21). Response duration ranged from 2.9 to 19.1+ months. Median PFS was 2.0 months; 6-month PFS rate was 26%. Median OS was 11.0 months; 6-month OS rate was 66%.Encouraging antitumor activity was observed with quavonlimab + pembrolizumab in patients with extensive-stage SCLC; responses were observed in PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. The combination was tolerable with manageable toxicities.

Background Effective dose to immune cell (EDIC), an estimated radiation dose to the circulating lymphocytes, is of significance for overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to validate the EDIC’s OS effect on limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Method and materials This study included LS-SCLC patients received definitive chemo-radiation in one single center from 2012 to 2017. All patients had multiple complete-blood-count tests including lymphocyte count at pre-, during- and end- radiotherapy. EDIC, computed according to doses of the lung, heart, and the total body, was assessed for its correlation with lymphocyte nadir, OS and progression free survival (PFS). Results Of 503 eligible patients, the mean EDIC was 7.34 Gy. The mean lymphocyte nadir was 0.48 × 109 cells/L, significantly lower than 1.65 × 109 cells/L at pre-radiotherapy (p Conclusions This study demonstrated that EDIC is an independent predictor for lymphocyte nadir, PFS and OS. EDIC may serve as a predictor for lymphocyte nadir and a surrogate marker for OS in LS-SCLC. More attention should be paid to EDIC to decease the lymphocyte toxicity and improve survival.

Spontaneous regression (SR) is defined as a complete or partial, temporary or permanent disappearance of a tumor without anticancer treatment, which potentially develops after surgery or biopsy for primary and metastatic tumors despite unknown incidence rate. Here, we report the incidence rate of SR after endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial nodal needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in lung cancer patients. Among 96 patients evaluable with chest CT before and after EBUS-TBNA, SR was found in three patients (3.1%). With regards to patient characteristics, two patients had small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and one patient had adenocarcinoma. All patients had stage 3 disease with a bulky N2 stage and a history of smoking. Two patients also had interstitial lung disease. Notably, SR was observed not only at the biopsied site, but also at the non-biopsied site. Our results indicate that SR can develop following EBUS-TBNA in a substantial proportion of lung cancer patients.

Lung cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide with an estimated 2 million new cases and 1·76 million deaths per year. Substantial improvements in our understanding of disease biology, application of predictive biomarkers, and refinements in treatment have led to remarkable progress in the past two decades and transformed outcomes for many patients. This seminar provides an overview of advances in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer, with a particular focus on targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Differentiation of primary versus secondary breast cancer can be difficult, with the relative rarity of the latter representing a diagnostic challenge. Here, we present a case of small cell lung cancer with synchronous bilateral breast metastases in a 52-year-old female. There are less than 5 other cases of small cell lung cancer with bilateral breast metastases reported in the literature to date. The breast metastases represented the first clinical and imaging manifestation of malignancy in our case. We present the patient's disease course including multi-modal imaging, histopathologic analysis, and clinical management. We aim to highlight the entity of secondary breast cancer and how multidisciplinary collaboration can help arrive at the diagnosis, which is critical for prognosis and treatment planning in this patient population.

No abstract available

The duration of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may affect patient outcomes. We aimed to determine the impact of a continuous versus discontinuous SBRT schedule on local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients.Consecutive NSCLC stage I patients (475) treated with SBRT in four centers were retrospectively analyzed. The delivered dose ranged from 48 to 75 Gy in 3-10 fractions. Based on the ratio between the treatment duration (TD) and number of fractions (n), patients were divided into two groups: continuous schedule (CS) (TD ≤ 1.6n; 239 patients) and discontinuous schedule (DS) (TD 1.6n; 236 patients). LC and OS were compared using Cox regression analyses after propensity score matching (216 pairs).The median follow-up period was 41 months. Multivariate analysis showed that the DS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.42; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.78) and number of fractions (HR: 1.24; 95 % CI: 1.07-1.43) were significantly associated with LC. The DS (HR: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.51-0.89), age (HR: 1.02; 95 % CI: 1-1.03), WHO performance status (HR: 2.27; 95 % CI: 1.39-3.7), and T stage (HR: 1.4; 95 % CI: 1.03-1.87) were significantly associated with OS. The 3-year LC and OS were 92 % and 64 % and 81 % and 53 % for DS and CS treatments, respectively (p 0.01). Cox analysis confirmed that the discontinuous SBRT schedule significantly increased LC and OS.DS is associated with significantly improved LC and OS in early-stage NSCLC patients treated with SBRT.

To investigate the differences in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) diagnostic imaging utilization relative to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.We retrospectively reviewed SCLC records at our institution between January 1, 2003 and August 1, 2019 (n = 529). Patients were grouped by extensive-stage versus limited-stage and diagnosis date. Clinical, CT, MRI, and nuclear imaging data was collected. Imaging utilization was compared using Student's t-test or Kruskal-Wallis-test/Wilcoxon-Rank-Sums test. Survival was compared using Log-rank-test and Kaplan-Meier-curves.SCLC patients had a median survival of 290 days. Extensive-stage patients with SCLC demonstrated an increase in emergency imaging utilization when diagnosed in 2011-2019 compared to 2003-2010 (CT abdomen/pelvis p 0.001, CTA chest for pulmonary embolism p 0.01, CT head p 0.003). Limited-stage patients with SCLC demonstrated an increase in inpatient imaging utilization (CT abdomen/pelvis p 0.04) and decreased total/outpatient imaging utilization (CT chest-abdomen-pelvis p 0.05, CT head p 0.003) when diagnosed in 2011-2019 compared to 2003-2010. All patients with SCLC had decreased average number of bone-scan studies when diagnosed in 2011-2019 compared to 2003-2010 (Extensive-stage p 0.006, Limited-stage p 0.0006).Imaging utilization trends in the management of patients with SCLC at our institution differed between 2003 and 2010 and 2011-2019 reflecting the changes in the NCCN guidelines.

Introduction The CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 randomized trial was designed to test whether high-dose thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) would improve survival compared with 45 Gy twice-daily (BID) TRT in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Two piloted experimental TRT regimens were of interest to study, 70 Gy daily (QD) and 61.2 Gy concomitant boost (CB). Driven by concerns about adequate patient accrual, a study design was employed that eliminated one experimental TRT arm based on early interim toxicity and tolerability, with the study then continuing as a traditional 2-arm phase III study. Methods Patients with LSCLC were assigned to receive four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy with one of 3 TRT regimens starting with either the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. The interim endpoint was the cumulative highest toxicity calculated from a scoring system based on treatment-related grade 3 and higher toxicity and the ability to complete therapy in the experimental arms. Results The final interim analysis was performed after 70 patients accrued to each experimental cohort, and a difference in treatment related toxicity scoring was not found (p = 0.739). Severe esophageal toxicity was comparable in both cohorts. Pulmonary toxicity was low overall, though 4 patients (5.7 %) on the 61.2 Gy arm developed grade 4 dyspnea, which was not observed in the 70 Gy arm. A protocol mandated decision was made to discontinue the 61.2 Gy arm following review of toxicity with the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Conclusion A randomized trial design using a planned early interim toxicity analysis to discriminate between experimental treatment arms is feasible in a phase III setting. Refinement of the design could increase the likelihood of detecting clinically meaningful differences in toxicity in future studies.

Background Transformation to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a resistance mechanism to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment that develops in lung adenocarcinoma. The genomic and treatment outcomes in these populations have not been comprehensively reported in China. Methods We performed a retrospective study analyzing patients with advanced non-SCLC (NSCLC) from eight sites who were diagnosed with SCLC transformation after receiving epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKI treatment including first/second- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs. We assessed the genomic features and clinical prognosis in these patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer. Results Thirty-two eligible patients with EGFR mutations were identified, 25 of whom had sufficient tumor tissues for detection of genes by next-generation sequencing. The median progression free survival (mPFS) for first/second-generation TKIs was 14.0 months. The most common mutations identified in samples with transformation to SCLC were in TP53 (17/25, 68.0 %), RB1 (9/25, 36.0 %), and PIK3CA (3/25, 12.0 %), and the incidence rates of RB1 and TP53 mutations were similar between patients receiving first/second-generation and third-generation TKI treatment. The estimated median time to SCLC transformation was 17.0 months. After SCLC transformation, platinum-etoposide was the most common treatment regimen, and the mPFS after platinum-etoposide treatment was 3.5 months. Anlotinib showed good efficacy in these patients (overall response rate, 66.7 %; mPFS, 6.2 months). The median overall survival after the initial diagnosis of metastatic lung cancer was 34.5 months, and patients with small cell transformation after third-generation TKI treatment had better prognosis than patients with transformation after first/second-generation treatment (49.4 months vs. 20.0 months, P = 0.013). Conclusion We observed that TP53 and RB1 mutations were common in Chinese patients with SCLC transformation, regardless of whether first/second-generation or third-generation EGFR-TKI treatments were used. Earlier occurrence of small cell transformation after EGFR-TKI treatment was associated with poorer prognosis of patients. After the standard chemotherapy regimens for the management of primary SCLC, anlotinib may be a therapeutic option.