Search

The aim of this feasibility study was to evaluate the response to cytotoxic and antiangiogenic treatment of colorectal liver metastasis using respiratory gated contrast enhanced ultrasonography. Seven patients were monitored with contrast enhanced ultrasound. Sulfur hexafluoride filled microbubbles (SonoVue Bracco S.P.A., Milan, Italy) were used as contrast agent and the scans were performed with a nonlinear imaging technique (power modulation) at low transmit power (MI=0.06). The mean image intensity in the metastatic lesion and in the normal liver parenchyma were measured as a function of time and time-intensity curves from linearized image data were formed. A novel respiratory gating technique was utilized to minimize the effects of respiratory motion on the images. A reference position of the diaphragm (or other echogenic interface) was selected and all frames where the diaphragm deviated from that position were rejected. The wash-in time (start of enhancement to peak) of metastasis and adjacent normal liver parenchyma was measured from time-intensity curves. The ratio of wash-in time of the lesion to that of the normal parenchyma (WITR) was used to compare the perfusion rate. In a reproducibility study (five patients), the average deviation of WITR was found to be 9%. There was an increase in the WITR for patients responding to treatment (mean WITR increase of 17% after first dose of treatment and 75% at the end of the therapy). In four out of five patients (80%) responding to therapy WITR predicted their response from the first treatment. All six patients that responded to therapy by the end of the therapy cycle (6–9 doses) were correctly predicted by using WITR. The WITR may be a new surrogate marker indicative of early tumor response for colorectal cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapy. (E-mail: maverk@ucy.ac.cy) Copyright &y& Elsevier] Copyright of Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology is the property of Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) 36 68 77 68-77

Purpose: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has become a widely used regimen in NSCLC due to phase II reports of moderate toxicity, reasonable activity and easy outpatient administration. Purpose of our present prospective study was to evaluate the dose-response relationship of paclitaxel. Patients and methods: Since July 1996, 198 patients with non-operable NSCLC and measurable disease without previous chemotherapy entered the trial. Ninety nine patients (group A) were randomized to receive paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in three-hour infusion plus carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 every 3 weeks and 99 (group B) to receive the same regimen with paclitaxel increased to 225 mg/m2. Eligibility criteria included WHO performance status 0-2, documented inoperable stage IIIA and IIIB, IV, no brain metastasis, no prior chemotherapy and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients in both groups were well-matched with baseline disease characteristics. Results: In group A with 90 evaluable patients, the response rate was 25.6%(6 CR, 17 PR) whereas in group B with 88 evaluable patients, the response rate was 31.8% (3 CR, 25 PR), P = 0.733. Median time to progression favored the high-dose paclitaxel (4.3 vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.044). The median survival was 9.5 months for group A versus 11.4 months for group B (P = 0.16). The one-year survival was 37% for group A and 44% for group B (P = 0.35). The best prognostic factor for one-year survival was the response rate (P < 0.0001). With a relative dose intensity of paclitaxel 0.94 in both groups, neurotoxicity (P = 0.025) and leucopenia (P = 0.038) were more pronounced in group B patients. No toxic death was observed. Conclusions: Higher dose paclitaxel prolongs the median time to progression but causes more neurotoxicity and leucopenia. The better response rate, the longer overall and better one-year survival seen with the higher dose of paclitaxel are not statistically significant. 11 7 799 805

Summary Purpose To evaluate the activity and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel given by three-hour infusion, and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Background Paclitaxel is an active agent in ABC. Furthermore, our group has shown that the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin is effective in anthracycline-resistant ABC. Patients and methods From January 1996 until March 1997, 66 women with ABC were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) by three-hour infusion followed by carboplatin at an AUC of 6 mg × min/ml every three weeks. The median age of the patients was 56 years (range 28–75). A total of 39 patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy and 22 of them were treated with an anthracycline or mitoxantrone-containing regimen. Results A total of 324 cycles (median: six) were administered, 273 (85%) of them at full dose. The median number of delivered cycles was six. The median delivered dose intensity (DI) of paclitaxel was 55.1 mg/m2/week (range 30.5–69.3) and the relative DI was 0.95 (range 0.5–1.2). Eight patients (12%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5%–22%) achieved complete and 28 (42%, 95% CI: 30%–55%) partial responses. Grade 3–4 toxicities included anemia (5%), granulocytopenia (24%), thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting and allergic reaction (3% each), myalgias/arthralgias and neurotoxicity (1,5% each). Febrile neutropenia occurred in eight (12%) patients. Alopecia was universal. After a median follow-up of 17.3 (range 0.07–24.5) months, 48 (72%) patients have demonstrated tumor progression and 24 (36%) have died. Median time to progression was 8.6 (range 0.07–23 +) months and median survival 20.4 (range 0.07-24.5 +) months. Conclusions The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has moderate activity in ABC and can be easily delivered on an outpatient basis with manageable toxicity. This regimen may be useful especially in patients to whom anthracyclines or cisplatin administration is precluded because of other concomitant diseases.

Summary Background It was recently reported that when ifosfamide was added to cisplatin and vinblastine the response rate was increased but not the survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of increased responses and survival with use of the combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide (VIP-16) in comparison tothe combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, vinblastine (VIP) in non-operable NSCLC. Patients and methods Two hundred twelve patients with histologically confirmed diagnoses of NSCLC were randomized into two groups: group A received cisplatin 100 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 every 3 weeks; group B received the same regimen except that etoposide 120 mg/m2 was substituted for vinblastine on days 1, 2, and 3. Patients were well balanced for age, sex, performance status (PS), stage, grade, histology and sites of disease, and the relative dose intensity was similar in both groups. Results One hundred one patients were evaluable for response in group A and 99 in group B. The overall response rates were 29% in group A (5CR) and 25% in group B (3CR). The median time to progression was 7.51 (2–35) months for group A and 7.7(1–28) months for group B (P = 0.34). The median survival was 8.49 (0.33–37.44) months for group A and 9.38 (0.43–36.59) for group B (P = 0.39). Multivariate Cox stepwise analysis showed stage to be the only significant prognostic factor for survival (P = 0.0114). Toxicity was not remarkable and not different between the two groups except for alopecia which was much more common in the patients who received etoposide. Conclusion VIP and VIP-16 combination chemotherapies are equally active in NSCLC with acceptable toxicity. Stage proved to be the most significant prognostic factor for survival in this study.