Search

The determination of gender of unknown persons is of vital importance in forensic investigations. The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of frontal sinus (FS) dimensions measurement in gender identification. One hundred people (50 males and 50 females) with age range from 20 to 70 years were selected in this study. FS dimensions for both right and left sinuses (transverse, height & anteroposterior lengths) were measured from axial and coronal sections (4-mm slice thickness) using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner. Statistically significant lower values for the maximum transverse length of both right and left FS in female group were detected in comparison to the male group ( p =0.002). In addition, the maximum height of right and left FS in females showed statistically highly significant lower values for in comparison to males ( p =0.001). Also, the maximum anteroposterior length of the frontal sinus for right and left sides in female group had statistically significant lower values ( p =0.001and 0.01 respectively) in comparison to the male group. Multiple regression equations revealed that among all FS measurements, the right FS anteroposterior length was the best discriminate variable between genders with overall accuracy 67.0% (70.0% for women and 64.0% for men). It can be concluded that FS dimensions measurement especially the right anteroposterior length are valuable in studying sexual dimorphism using MDCT image.

Aim of the study It is a retrospective study aiming to provide diagnostic characterization of ILC in Dynamic MR-Mammography and to compare its diagnostic performance to mammography and ultrasonography. Material and Method A total of 56 cases of ILC were selected in retrospective review of mammography, ultrasonography and Dynamic MRM of 420 patients with invasive breast cancer. Results Asymmetric density was the commonest mammography finding and the measured sensitivity of mammography in detecting ILC was 87.5% (9/56 FN).The most common US manifestation of ILC was focal shadowing without a discrete mass and its sensitivity in detecting ILC was 84.9% (10/56 FN). At MR imaging, the most common manifestation of ILC was a solitary irregular or angular mass with speculated or ill-defined margins (33.9%of cases [n = 19]).The measured sensitivity is 96.5% (2/56 FN). Additional data such as those affected the patient management including the presence of multifocal or multicentric disease, chest wall involvement and contralateral breast cancer were encountered in 48.2% of cases [n = 27]. ILC has a tendency to demonstrate delayed maximum enhancement with washout exhibited by only a minority of lesions (21.4% [n = 12]). Conclusion MR imaging has proved to be superior to mammography and US in the detection and management of ILC. It provides useful information for further management and pre-surgical planning.