Search

Objective Efforts to implement competency-based medical education require new sources of workplace-based evidence of growth in learning. We used qualitative analysis of operative notes to explore procedural variation in a simple surgical procedure. Design We used a grounded theory-based mixed methods approach to depict intersurgeon procedural variation. Our grounded theory approach to analysis included follow up interviews with surgeons and residents to probe their understandings of the reasons for variation in the dictated notes and the current and potential utility of operative notes as a reliable source of data for learning and assessment. Setting Publicly funded tertiary care otolaryngology-head & neck surgery residency program in Ontario, Canada Participants Using maximum variability sampling, all surgeons performing tonsillectomy in the department (n = 6) contributed operative notes from 65 tonsillectomies, 5 intraoperative observations, and 4 semi-structured interviews. An additional 3 residents from various levels of training contributed semistructured interviews. Results Intersurgeon procedural variations persist even in simple surgical procedures such as tonsillectomy. Operative notes appear to capture procedural variations in a limited way. Surgeons and resident make informal educational use of the clerical work of writing and assessing operative notes, but optimization will be required to shift such hidden work into the formal educational domain. Conclusions The implementation of competency-based medical education requires surgical educators to both eliminate low-yield tasks for learning and to find new opportunities for multiple low-stakes assessment. Analysis of operative notes may become a high-yield strategy for learning and assessment if residents and surgeons are coached to use operative notes more reliably and efficiently.

Objective In surgical environments, work must be flexible, allowing practitioners to seek help when required. How surgeons navigate the complexity of interprofessional teams and collaborative care whilst attending to their own knowledge/skill gaps can be difficult. This study aims to understand helping behaviours in interprofessional surgical teams. Design Thirteen semi-structured interviews with participants were completed. Data collection and inductive analysis were conducted iteratively using thematic analysis. Results We found several intersecting features that influenced helping engagement. Work context, including nested and cross-sectional identities, physical and hierarchical environments, diversity, support for risk-taking and innovation and perceptions of a “speak up” culture shaped the way helping scenarios were approached. Intrinsic attributes influenced decisions to dis/engage. When united, these features shaped how helping behaviours became enacted. Conclusion If we desire to create surgical teams that deliver quality care, we must consider not only individual attributes but the context in which teams are situated.

Observing experts constitutes an important and common learning experience for surgical residents before operating under direct guidance. However, studies suggest that exclusively observing experts may induce suboptimal motor learning, and watching errors from non-experts performing simple motor tasks may generate better performance. We investigated whether observational learning is transferrable to arthroscopy learning using virtual reality (VR) simulation.In our surgical simulation laboratory, we compared students learning basic skills on a VR arthroscopy simulator after watching an expert video demonstration of VR arthroscopy tasks or a non-expert video demonstration of the same tasks to a Control group without video demonstration. Ninety students in 3 observing groups (expert, non-expert, and Control) subsequently completed the same procedure on a VR arthroscopy simulator. We hypothesized the non-expert-watching group would outperform the expert-watching group, and both groups to outperform the Control group. We examined performance pretest, posttest, and 1 week later.Participants were recruited from the final year of medical school and the very early first year of surgical residency training programs (orthopaedic surgery, urology, plastic surgery, and general surgery) at Western University (Ontario, Canada).All participants improved their overall performance from pretest to retention (p0.001). At initial retention testing, non-expert-watching group outperformed the other groups in camera path length p0.05 and time to completion, p0.05, and both the expert/non-expert groups surpassed the Control group in camera path length (p0.05).We suggest that error-observation may contribute to skills improvement in the non-expert-watching group. Allowing novices to observe techniques/errors of other novices may assist internalization of specific movements/skills required for effective motor performances. This study highlights the potential effect of observational learning on surgical skills acquisition and offers preliminary evidence for peer-based practice (combined non-experts and experts) as a complementary surgical motor skills training strategy.

Background Education researchers are studying the practices of high-stake professionals as they learn how to better train for flexibility under uncertainty. This study explores the “Reconciliation Cycle” as the core element of an intraoperative decision-making model of how experienced surgeons assess and respond to challenges. Methods We analyzed 32 semistructured interviews using constructivist grounded theory to develop a model of intraoperative decision making. Using constant comparison analysis, we built on this model with 9 follow-up interviews about the most challenging cases described in our dataset. Results The Reconciliation Cycle constituted an iterative process of “gaining” and “transforming information.” The cyclical nature of surgeons’ decision making suggested that transforming information requires a higher degree of awareness, not yet accounted by current conceptualizations of situation awareness. Conclusions This study advances the notion of situation awareness in surgery. This characterization will support further investigations on how expert and nonexpert surgeons implement strategies to cope with unexpected events.

Objective Asking for help in the operating room occurs within a surgical culture that has traditionally valued independence, decisiveness, and confidence. A tension exists between these deeply ingrained character traits and the new culture of team-based practice that emphasizes maximizing patient safety. The objective of this study is to explore surgeon-to-surgeon help-seeking behaviors during complex and unanticipated operative scenarios. Study Design Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 14 consultant surgeons from multiple specialties. We used constructivist grounded theory to explore help-seeking experiences. Analysis occurred alongside and informed data collection. Themes were identified iteratively using constant comparisons. Setting The setting included 3 separate hospital sites in a Canadian academic health sciences center. Participants A total of 14 consultant surgeons from 3 separate departments and 7 divisions were included. Results We developed the “Call-Save-Threat” framework to conceptualize the help-seeking phenomenon. Respondents highlighted both explicit and tacit reasons for calling for help; the former included technical assistance and help with decision making, and the latter included the need for moral support, “saving face,” and “political cover.” “The Save” included the provision of enhanced technical expertise, a broader intraoperative perspective, emotional support, and a learning experience. “The Threat” included potential downsides to calling, which may result in near-term or delayed negative consequences. These included giving up autonomy as primary surgeon, threats to a surgeon’s image as a competent practitioner, and a failure to progress with respect to independent judgment and surgical abilities. Conclusions Our “Call-Save-Threat” framework suggests that surgeons recurrently negotiate when and how to seek help in the interests of patient safety, while attending to the traditional cultural values of autonomy and decisive action. This has important implications for surgical postgraduate education and also throughout a surgeon’s career trajectory.