Search

Background: Administration of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prolongs QTc corrected interval (QTc). The effect and safety of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in combination with these therapies have seldom been studied. Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate changes in QTc in patients receiving double (Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin) and triple therapy (Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin + Lopinavir/Ritonavir) to treat COVID-19. Secondary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital all-cause mortality. Methods: Patients under treatment with double (DT) and triple therapy (TT) for COVID-19 were consecutively included in this prospective observational study. Serial in-hospital electrocardiograms were performed to measure QTc at baseline and during therapy. Results: 168 patients (±66.2 years old) were included: 32.1% received DT and 67.9% received TT. The mean baseline QTc was 410.33 ms. Patients under DT and TT prolonged QTc interval respect baseline values (p, Highlights • What is known? • Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin prolong QTc in patients with COVID-19, prompting ECG monitoring due to increased risk of ventricular arrythmias. • What is the new? • The impact of Lopinavir/Ritonavir in addition to Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on QTc has not been studied previously. In our series, triple therapy did not further prolong QTc interval compared to double therapy.

Introduction and objectives The clinical impact of the systems for rapid access to reperfusion therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been definitely established. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect on short term mortality of a myocardial infarction network organization (MINO). Methods A prospective single-center cohort study was designed, including all patients who met the following criteria: chest pain, less than 12 h since symptoms onset, and ST-segment elevation in at least 2 contiguous leads on the electrocardiogram. Results A total of 594 patients were included. MINO patients had both lower time since symptoms onset and lower time from arrival at the hospital to guidewire introduction in the culprit coronary artery: median of 190 min [IQR 130/270] vs 258 min [IQR 165/420] P 1 was detected in 36.4% vs 25.28%, respectively, P = .076. There were 45 deaths during 30-day follow-up, 5.6% in the MINO group vs 10.7%. Patients using MINO had better mid-term survival, log-rank test = 5.41, P = .02. However, in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, it was not associated with total mortality, HR, 0.71 (0.39–1.36). Conclusions In patients with STEMI, the set-up of a system to provide rapid reperfusion reduces the time to the opening of the culprit coronary artery. However, we did not find any difference in 30-day mortality rate in multivariable models.