Search

Disposable instrument use during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is a significant driver of cost. The purpose of the study was to measure the effect of increasing surgeon cost awareness via successive "value improvement initiatives" on instrument costs.We prospectively collected disposable instrument use data for all video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies performed by 5 Board-certified thoracic surgeons over 4 successive time periods: Period 1: control group of consecutive video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies before interventions; Period 2: video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies after displaying disposables price list in operating room; Period 3: video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies after educational presentation outlining disposable instrument price differences; Period 4: video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies after surgeon self-assessment with peer comparison of cost data from Period 3 and positive deviance seminar identifying the lowest-cost surgeon to lead discussion of optimal cost-reduction strategies. Instrument use and costs were compared among the 4 groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test.A total of 373 lobectomy cases were analyzed. Compared with Period 1, median stapler-related and total disposable costs for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy cases decreased after successive value improvement initiatives, with lowest costs in Period 4 (P .0001). Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated per lobectomy disposables cost reduction of $397.53 in Period 4, after controlling for surgeon and lobe (P .0001). Operating room time was reduced after successive value improvement initiatives (P .0001).Cost awareness and surgeon engagement activities were associated with sustained cost reduction for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Surgeon self-assessment, peer comparison, and positive deviance seminar were associated with the largest cost reduction. Significant hospital cost-savings may be realized with surgeon-led value improvement initiatives.

Background The indeterminate pulmonary nodule is a common clinical problem. Preoperative tissue diagnosis is not always possible, despite all attempts. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of a malignant diagnosis in this scenario and whether attempted preoperative biopsy impacted estimation of the risk of malignancy. Patients and Methods We reviewed 500 consecutive cases of pulmonary resection without a preoperative tissue diagnosis at a tertiary care center from 2009 to 2013. Age, sex, smoking status, prior malignancy, tumor size, and whether or not tissue diagnosis had been attempted were recorded. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine factors associated with a malignant diagnosis. Results There were 297 males (59.4%), the mean age was 64.9 years, and 412 had a smoking history (82.4%). Also, 203 patients (40.6%) had a malignancy history, and 36 patients (7.2%) had previous lung cancer. Biopsy was attempted for 102 patients (20.5%). The final diagnosis was lung cancer in 336 patients (67.2%), metastatic cancer in 93 patients (18.6%), and benign tumour in 71 patients (14.2%). Male sex, increasing age, smoking history, and prior lung cancer were positive predictors of lung cancer. Model discrimination was good (c-statistic, 0.83). Attempted biopsy did not alter model discrimination. Conclusion: In this cohort, 86% of resected lesions were malignant. The decision to pursue preoperative tissue diagnosis did not change the predictive ability offered by clinical factors. These findings are reassuring in the scenario when a patient is operable but the diagnosis remains unknown.

Herpes simplex virus is an uncommon cause of esophagitis and particularly so in immunocompetent individuals. Although the common presentation tends to be odynophagia and/or dysphagia, fever, and retrosternal chest pain, there are variations and rarely it can present more ominously as esophageal rupture. We report a rare case of esophageal perforation with penetration into the vertebral space secondary to chronic herpes simplex virus esophagitis in a 71-year-old immunocompetent woman. This is the second known such occurrence. The patient had a long stay in the hospital but recovered from the condition and was followed up for 1 year after initial presentation.

Background The selection of tidal volumes for 1-lung ventilation remains unclear, because there exists a trade-off between oxygenation and risk of lung injury. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine how oxygenation, compliance, and clinical outcomes are affected by tidal volume during 1-lung ventilation. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed. A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Pooled mean difference estimated arterial oxygen tension, compliance, and length of stay; pooled odds ratio was calculated for composite postoperative pulmonary complications. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane risk of bias and Newcastle-Ottawa tools. Results Eighteen studies were identified, comprising 3693 total patients. Low tidal volumes (5.6 [±0.9] mL/kg) were not associated with significant differences in partial pressure of oxygen (−15.64 [−88.53-57.26] mm Hg; P = .67), arterial oxygen tension to fractional intake of oxygen ratio (14.71 [−7.83-37.24]; P = .20), or compliance (2.03 [−5.22-9.27] mL/cmH2O; P = .58) versus conventional tidal volume ventilation (8.1 [±3.1] mL/kg). Low versus conventional tidal volume ventilation had no significant impact on hospital length of stay (−0.42 [−1.60-0.77] days; P = .49). Low tidal volumes are associated with significantly decreased odds of pulmonary complications (pooled odds ratio, 0.40 [0.29-0.57]; P Conclusions Low tidal volumes during 1-lung ventilation do not worsen oxygenation or compliance. A low tidal volume ventilation strategy during 1-lung ventilation was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications.

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is the most common major perioperative complication and is associated with short- and long-term recurrent major vascular events after surgery. Diagnostic criteria for MINS have been established for troponin T assays but are unknown for high

Summary Background The optimal means of pre-operative risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. Objective To examine the accuracy of AF thromboembolic risk models (the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and R2CHADS2 scores) for predicting 30-day stroke and/or all-cause mortality after non-cardiac surgery in patients with preoperative AF, and to compare these risk scores with the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI). Patients/Methods A multicentre (8 countries, 2007–2011) prospective cohort study of patients ≥ 45 years of age undergoing inpatient non-cardiac surgery, who were followed until 30 days after surgery. We calculated c-statistics for each risk prediction model and net reclassification improvements (NRIs) compared with the RCRI. Results The 961 patients with preoperative AF were at higher risk of any cardiovascular event in the 30 days postoperatively compared with the 13 001 patients without AF: 26.6% vs. 9.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–1.88. All thromboembolic risk scores predicted postoperative death just as well as the RCRI (with c-indices between 0.67 and 0.72). Compared with the RCRI (which had a c-index of 0.64 for 30-day stroke/death), the CHADS2 (c-index, 0.67; NRI, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.02–0.61) significantly improved postoperative stroke/mortality risk prediction, largely due to improved discrimination of patients who did not subsequently have an event. Conclusions In AF patients, the three thromboembolic risk scores performed similarly to the RCRI in predicting death within 30 days and the CHADS2 score was the best predictor of postoperative stroke/death regardless of type of surgery.

Objectives A P-value Study Design and Setting A review of RCTs in high-impact medical journals that reported a statistically significant result for at least one dichotomous or time-to-event outcome in the abstract. In the group with the smallest number of events, we changed the status of patients without an event to an event until the P-value exceeded 0.05. We labeled this number the Fragility Index; smaller numbers indicated a more fragile result. Results The 399 eligible trials had a median sample size of 682 patients (range: 15-112,604) and a median of 112 events (range: 8-5,142); 53% reported a P-value Conclusion The statistically significant results of many RCTs hinge on small numbers of events. The Fragility Index complements the P-value and helps identify less robust results.