1. Ambulatory Monitoring of Heart Sounds via an Implanted Device Is Superior to Auscultation for Prediction of Heart Failure Events
- Author
-
Pramodsingh H. Thakur, Michael Cao, Christopher Schulze, Qi An, Yi Zhang, Devi Nair, John P. Boehmer, Roy S Gardner, Brian Kwan, and Ramesh Hariharan
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Auscultation ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,Heart failure ,Heart sounds ,Ambulatory ,medicine ,Cardiology ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Implanted device ,Third heart sound - Abstract
Objectives To compare the relationship between the third heart sound (S3) measured by implantable cardiac devices (devS3) and auscultation (ausS3) and evaluate their prognostic power for predicting heart failure events (HFEs). Methods In the MultiSENSE study, devS3 was measured daily with continuous values while ausS3 was assessed at study visits with discrete grades. They were compared between patients with and without HFEs at baseline and against each other directly. Cox proportional hazard models were developed between follow-up visits (FUs) and over the whole study. Simulations were performed on devS3 to match limitations of auscultation. Results Nine hundred patients were studied, of whom 106 patients experienced 192 HFEs. Two S3 sensing modalities correlated with each other but at baseline only devS3 differentiated patients with or without HFEs (p Conclusions S3 measured from implantable cardiac devices has stronger prognostic power to predict episodes of future HF events than that of auscultation.
- Published
- 2020