Search

HBV nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NrtIs) do not completely suppress HBV replication. Previous reports indicate persistent viremia during NrtI treatment despite HBV DNA being undetectable. HBV core inhibitors may enhance viral suppression when combined with NrtIs. This phase II trial (NCT03576066) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the investigational core inhibitor, vebicorvir (VBR), in virologically- suppressed patients on NrtIs.Non-cirrhotic, NrtI-suppressed patients with chronic HBV were randomised to VBR 300 mg once daily or matching placebo (PBO) for 24 weeks. Treatment was stratified by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status. The primary endpoint was change from Baseline in serum HBeAg or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) after 24 weeks.Of 73 patients enrolled, 47 were HBeAg positive and 26 were HBeAg negative. In HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, there were no differences in the change from Baseline at Week 24 for HBsAg or HBeAg. Using a novel, high-sensitivity assay to detect HBV DNA, a greater proportion of patients with detectable HBV DNA at Baseline achieved undetectable HBV DNA at Week 24 in the VBR+NrtI vs. PBO+NrtI group. In HBeAg-positive patients, a greater change from Baseline in HBV pregenomic (pg)RNA was observed at Week 24 with VBR+NrtI vs. PBO+NrtI. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in VBR+NrtI patients included upper respiratory tract infection, nausea, and pruritus. No serious adverse events, Grade 4 TEAEs, or deaths were reported.In this 24-week study, VBR+NrtI demonstrated a favourable safety and tolerability profile. While there were no significant changes in viral antigen levels, enhanced viral suppression was demonstrated by greater changes in DNA and pgRNA with the addition of VBR compared to NrtI alone.NCT03576066.Core inhibitors represent a novel approach for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with mechanisms of action distinct from existing treatments. In this study, vebicorvir added to existing therapy reduced HBV replication to a greater extent than existing treatment and was generally safe and well tolerated.

During a 5-month period, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of qualitative cultures of intravenous catheters submitted to a university hospital microbiology laboratory. Of 36 catheters submitted for culture from nonseptic patients, 10 (28%) grew one or more microorganisms on qualitative culture. Of 44 catheters cultured from septic patients, 20 (45%) grew one or more microorganisms, but only 5 grew microorganisms that also were isolated from blood cultures. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for catheter-related bacteremia were 71%, 96%, and 17%, values similar to those reported for quantitative methods. Although acceptable in terms of sensitivity and specificity, the very low positive predictive value suggests that catheter-related bacteremia cannot be predicted reliably by this test. We conclude, therefore, that nonstandardized qualitative IV catheter cultures have minimal value as predictors of bacteremia and recommend that they not be performed in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Toxic shock syndrome has been noted to occur with nasal surgery, both with and without packing. A new synthetic sponge, described as a nasal tampon, has become available for use as packing after surgery. Herein is reported the first case of toxic shock syndrome associated with the use of this nasal tampon.