Search

What are the main risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy and what is the true incidence of ectopic pregnancies in an IVF programme?Retrospective single-centre study of 12,429 blastocyst transfers (8182 fresh and 4247 frozen embryo transfers) conducted between January 2010 and December 2017. IVF outcome was analysed, and ectopic pregnancy risk evaluated according to patient's characteristics and assisted reproductive technology treatment factors.Of 5061 patients reporting a positive pregnancy test, 43 were diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy (0.85%). Neither female age (36.7 versus 35.8 years), body mass index, quality of transfer nor stimulation protocol affected the ectopic pregnancy rate, but history of previous ectopic pregnancy (OR 3.26; P = 0.0080), tubal surgery, or both (OR 6.20; P0.0001) did. The incidence of ectopic pregnancy was increased in women with uterine malformations (OR 3.85; P = 0.0052), uterine pathologies (OR 5.35; P = 0.0001), uterine surgeries (OR 2.29; P = 0.0154) or sub-optimal endometrial build-up (OR 4.46 to 5.31; P0.0001). Transfer of slow-developing blastocysts (expressed by expansion) significantly increased the risk of ectopic pregnancy (OR 2.59; P = 0.0102).Unfavourable uterine environment, including uterine pathologies, uterine or tubal surgery and suboptimal endometrial build-up were related to ectopic pregnancy. Low expansion grade of blastocysts was identified as an additional putative risk factor for ectopic pregnancy, indicating the importance of proper embryonal-maternal synchronization. The overall ectopic pregnancy rate after blastocyst transfer was low, comparable with reported ectopic pregnancy rates in spontaneous conceptions. Proper evaluation of tubal and uterine pathologies, optimizing endometrial preparation and the transfer of expanded blastocysts in a frozen embryo transfer cycle, might be beneficial.

Vitrification has been successfully applied in the cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos. It can be achieved either by direct (open system) or indirect (closed system) contact with liquid nitrogen. Unlike embryo vitrification, few reports have been published regarding oocyte vitrification in closed systems. In order to validate the effectiveness of a closed and aseptic vitrification approach for oocyte cryopreservation, a prospective, randomized study was performed. Sibling oocytes donated from the same donor were randomly and equally assigned into closed or open vitrification groups. A total of 75 vitrification-warming cycles were performed in each group. Apart from the survival rate (82.9% versus 91.0%, P

The use of open carriers for embryo vitrification has raised safety concerns and therefore vitrification in closed systems has been proposed. However, the drop in the cooling rate emerges as a major drawback. The objective of the present study was to compare the efficiency of vitrification in open versus closed conditions. Blastocysts were randomly allocated either to open ultra-rapid vitrification (group I) or closed aseptic vitrification (group II). In group I, blastocysts were exposed to two solutions of ethylene glycol/dimethylsulphoxide (10%/10% and 20%/20%), while in group II, blastocysts were pretreated with a solution of lower concentration (5%/5%). A total of 208 and 224 vitrification-warming cycles were performed for groups I and II, respectively. Both groups were equal in terms of maternal age, sperm parameters and number and quality of blastocysts vitrified, warmed and transferred per cycle. Importantly, there was no significant difference between the groups in the analysed outcomes; embryo survival rate (84.1% versus 82.1%), clinical pregnancy rate (45.9% versus 42.4%), implantation rate (25.6% versus 24.5%), cycle cancellation rate (6.7% versus 8.5%) and live birth rate (41.2% versus 41.0%). These data suggest that ultra-rapid vitrification may be replaced by aseptic vitrification without affecting clinical efficiency.

Since the introduction of the motile sperm organelle morphology examination, there has been increasing recognition of the fact that the presence of large nuclear vacuoles might have deleterious effects on embryo development. Nevertheless, one fundamental question still being debated is whether specific in-vitro conditions during the handling of semen have an impact on vacuole formation. This study's objective was to analyse whether incubation temperature (20, 37°C) or oxidative stress stimulates the formation of nuclear vacuoles. Furthermore, it examined whether vacuoles disappear in the presence of an acrosome reaction inducer. Therefore, a system of sperm-microcapture channels was developed to permit the observation of the same living spermatozoa over a period of 24h. Neither incubation at 37°C nor induction of oxidative stress led to de-novo formation of nuclear vacuoles. Induction of the acrosome reaction using calcium ionophore A23587 did not lead to any modifications in the proportion of spermatozoa with vacuoles or to the disappearance of pre-existing vacuoles. According to these observations, it is concluded that nuclear vacuoles on the sperm head are already produced at earlier stages of sperm maturation and are not induced or modulated by routine laboratory environments. The examination of spermatozoa at very high magnification has led to the increasingly widespread recognition that the presence of large vacuoles in the human sperm head has deleterious effects on embryo development. One fundamental question, however, still remains: do specific conditions in the laboratory during the preparation and the handling of semen have an impact on vacuole formation? Our initial objective was to analyse whether different incubation temperatures (20, 37°C) and the induction of oxidative stress lead to the formation of sperm head vacuoles. Furthermore, we examined whether vacuoles disappear in the presence of an acrosome reaction inducer. In order to do this we developed a system of sperm-microcapture channels, which permits the observation of the same living spermatozoa over a period of 24h. Incubation at 37°C or induction of oxidative stress did not lead to the formation of any new vacuoles. After inducing the acrosome reaction, we did not detect any modification in the proportion of vacuolated spermatozoa. According to our observations, different temperatures or environmental conditions in the laboratory have no impact on the formation or disappearance of vacuoles. We conclude that sperm head vacuoles are already produced at earlier stages of sperm maturation.

In some IVF cycles, no fresh embryo transfer in the stimulated cycle is advisable. The cryopreservation of zygotes and the transfer of blastocysts in a cryo-embryo transfer is an option to circumvent an inadequate uterine environment due to risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, inappropriate endometrium build up, endometrial polyps or uterine myomas. For this strategy, highly secure and safe cryopreservation protocols are advisable. This study describes a protocol for aseptic vitrification of zygotes that results in high survival rates and minimizes the potential risk of contamination in liquid nitrogen during cooling and long-term storage. In mouse zygotes, there was no difference in efficiency as compared with a conventional open vitrification system. In IVF patients, aseptically vitrified zygotes showed no difference in blastocyst formation rate as compared with sibling zygotes kept in fresh culture. A clinical study comprising 173 cryo-cycles with a transfer of blastocysts originating from vitrified zygotes showed an ongoing pregnancy rate of 40.9%. The live birth rate per patient was 36.8%. A combination of good clinical results and increased safety conditions due to aseptic vitrification encourages the use of cryo-embryo transfer for patients with a suboptimal uterine environment in a fresh cycle. In stimulated IVF cycles, high doses of hormones are given to stimulate multifollicular growth. One drawback of the hormonal substitution is that the uterine environment is not at the same time optimally prepared for embryo implantation. A solution, which is increasingly under discussion, is to cryopreserve the embryos obtained in the stimulated cycle and to transfer them back into the optimal uterine environment in a subsequent cryo-cycle. This procedure requires highly secure and safe cryopreservation protocols in order to ensure benefits for both pregnancy and birth rates. We have established a protocol for the vitrification of zygote-stage embryos in aseptic devices, which minimize the potential risk of contamination during cooling and storage. The vitrified zygotes showed the same blastocyst development as compared with sibling zygotes in fresh culture. A clinical study comprising 173 cryo-cycles with transfer of blastocysts originating from vitrified zygotes shows an ongoing pregnancy rate of 40.9%. The live birth rate per patient was 36.8%. A combination of good clinical results and increased safety conditions due to aseptic vitrification conditions contributes to a change in transfer strategy and encourages us to increase the cryo-embryo transfer rate for an optimal uterine environment.

Vitrification with the use of "Open" carrier devices (Cryoloop, cryotop, cryoleaf, Vitriplug) which allowed the contact with liquid nitrogen has become a more popular way to achieve cooling rate superior to 20,000 °C/min. Even though the question of contamination with liquid nitrogen during ultra-rapid cooling and storage remain debatable with the use of "open" devices, it is important to revise the carrier system in a way, which minimizes the risk of contamination. According to the EU tissues and cells directive, it is advisable that the cooling and storage should be carried out in embryo carrier devices ensuring complete separation of the embryos from liquid nitrogen in a way, which minimizes the risk of contamination. The consequence of a reduction in the cooling rate resulting from the heat-insulating barrier of aseptic devices has to be counteracted by gradually increasing intracellular concentrations of cryoprotectants without inducing a toxic effect. We developed an aseptic vitrification method of vitrification for MII oocytes and embryos at different stage of development using the "VitriSafe" as "closed" carrier device.

The use of high levels of cryoprotectants (CPs) in solutions applied to vitrify oocytes or embryos is an argument to still prefer slow freezing procedure. Is it a justified argument? Out of three studies using mice zygotes we may assume that (i) the intracellular concentration of CPs is far lower than the one in the vitrification solutions, (ii) the intracellular concentration of CPs in the vitrified zygote is in contrary to the common beliefs even lower than the one observed after a slow freezing procedure, (iii) survival after slow freezing reflects the presence of an intracellular vitrified state in these cells.

Although some post-thaw morphological predictors of pregnancy have been investigated in slow freezing of blastocysts, no such data have been published for vitrified and warmed blastocysts. Therefore, a prospective four-part score was applied to vitrified/warmed day-5 embryos to evaluate whether certain morphological parameters could serve as predictors of implantation, pregnancy and live birth. All morulae/blastocysts that were considered to be viable after warming were scored according to a previously unpublished grading system based on re-expansion, hatching (out of an artificial gap in the zona pellucida), extensive cytoplasmic granulation and presence of necrotic foci. Overall, 74% (202/273) of the vitrified concepti were found to be viable after warming. Early blastocysts showed better survival versus extended/hatching blastocysts (P < 0.01). Of the morphological parameters analysed, immediate re-expansion (P < 0.05) and hatching (P < 0.001) were positive predictors of the rates of implantation, pregnancy and live birth. The opposite holds for extensive cytoplasmic granulation (P < 0.05), which was negatively related. Accurate scoring of warmed blastocysts (within the first 2 h) allows for prediction of pregnancy outcome, and thus will help to further reduce the number of transferred embryos.

Resume La vitrification est un processus par lequel un liquide se solidifie sans formation de cristaux. Cette technique de cryopreservation consiste a exposer pour de courtes durees les embryons a des concentrations elevees en cryoprotecteurs puis de les refroidir ultrarapidement, ce qui induit une augmentation de la viscosite favorisant la formation d'un etat vitreux intra- et extracellulaire. Malgre l'obtention de taux de survie et de grossesse respectivement de l'ordre de 80 et 30 % accompagnes de la naissance d'enfants en parfaite sante, apres vitrification de zygotes, d'embryons segmentes, de morulae et de blastocystes, une apprehension subsiste quant a son application dans les centres d'Assistance medicale a la procreation. L'utilisation de concentration elevee de cryoprotecteurs et de technique de refroidissement et de stockage des embryons dans des conditions non steriles sont des arguments qui discreditent la technique. Le but de cet article est de repondre dans la premiere partie a differentes questions concernant la technique et les apprehensions qu'elle suscite. Dans une deuxieme partie seront presentes les resultats de la vitrification des embryons, et analysees les raisons liees a la difficulte de cryopreserver les blastocystes.

The target of any cryopreservation procedure should be to ensure high survival rates of living cells after thawing. Two important parameters determine the success of any cryopreservation protocol: the manner in which cells regain equilibrium in response to cooling, and the speed of freezing (cooling rate). Slow-rate freezing protocols result in the formation of ice crystals during cooling and warming. Vitrification, in which high cooling rates in combination with a high concentration of cryoprotectant are used, does not produce any ice crystals during cooling and warming. However, there is a practical limit to the attainable cooling speed, and also a biological limit to the concentration of cryoprotectant tolerated by the cells during vitrification. Although post-warming survival depends on the species, the developmental stage and the quality of the embryos being vitrified, it seems clear that vitrification methods are increasingly successful and might be a better method than slow cooling procedures in the field of cryobiology. Many of the potential problems and benefits underlying vitrification as a method of choice for embryo cryopreservation in clinical embryology will be discussed in this review.

To determine the best day for the selection and transfer of a single embryo, a prospective, randomized study was undertaken that compared the ongoing pregnancy rate (PR) after single embryo transfer (SET) on day 3 with that after single blastocyst transfer (SBT) on day 5. Our results show an overall significantly higher PR after SBT (32.8%) compared with SET (23.2%), and a PR of 40.8% after SBT versus 25.6% after excellent-quality embryos became available.

Objective To limit the high number of multiple pregnancies in an IVF program. Setting In Vitro Fertilization Laboratory, Fertility Department, Public Hospital. Interventions The number of embryos transferred was limited to two instead of three. Results Limiting the number of embryos transferred to only two did not influence the take home baby rate but eliminated triplet and quadruplet gestations. Moreover, the number of patients with good quality supernumerary embryos available for cryopreservation increased. Conclusions To reduce the high frequency of multiple gestations in an IVF program, the number of embryos replaced should be limited to a maximum of two.

Objective To achieve fertilization and cleavage by spermatozoa retrieved by testicular biopsy from a male with testicular tubular atrophy. Design Clinical trial. Setting Private reproductive institute. Patient Azoospermic male with demonstrated testicular tubular atrophy and almost complete spermatogenic arrest. Intervention Open biopsy retrieval of testicular tissue and sperm followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Main Outcome Measures Fertilization and cleavage. Results One four- to six-cell embryo was formed after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of five eggs with extruded polar bodies by retrieved sperm. Conclusion Intracytoplasmic sperm injection after testicular sperm aspiration may be attempted in cases with severely decreased spermatogenesis and result in fertilization, cleavage, and embryo transfer.