Search

Summary Background In the primary analysis of the pivotal JULIET trial of tisagenlecleucel, an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, the best overall response rate was 52% and the complete response rate was 40% in 93 evaluable adult patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas. We aimed to do a long-term follow-up analysis of the clinical outcomes and correlative analyses of activity and safety in the full adult cohort. Methods In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial (JULIET) done at 27 treatment sites in ten countries (Australia, Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, and the USA), adult patients (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas who were ineligible for, did not consent to, or had disease progression after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 at screening, were enrolled. Patients received a single intravenous infusion of tisagenlecleucel (target dose 5 × 108 viable transduced CAR T cells). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ie, the proportion of patients with a best overall disease response of a complete response or partial response using the Lugano classification, as assessed by an independent review committee) at any time post-infusion and was analysed in all patients who received tisagenlecleucel (the full analysis set). Safety was analysed in all patients who received tisagenlecleucel. JULIET is registered with ClinialTrials.gov , NCT02445248 , and is ongoing. Findings Between July 29, 2015, and Nov 2, 2017, 167 patients were enrolled. As of Feb 20, 2020, 115 patients had received tisagenlecleucel infusion and were included in the full analysis set. At a median follow-up of 40·3 months (IQR 37·8–43·8), the overall response rate was 53·0% (95% CI 43·5–62·4; 61 of 115 patients), with 45 (39%) patients having a complete response as their best overall response. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were anaemia (45 [39%]), decreased neutrophil count (39 [34%]), decreased white blood cell count (37 [32%]), decreased platelet count (32 [28%]), cytokine release syndrome (26 [23%]), neutropenia (23 [20%]), febrile neutropenia (19 [17%]), hypophosphataemia (15 [13%]), and thrombocytopenia (14 [12%]). The most common treatment-related serious adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (31 [27%]), febrile neutropenia (seven [6%]), pyrexia (six [5%]), pancytopenia (three [3%]), and pneumonia (three [3%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation Tisagenlecleucel shows durable activity and manageable safety profiles in adult patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas. For patients with large B-cell lymphomas that are refractory to chemoimmunotherapy or relapsing after second-line therapies, tisagenlecleucel compares favourably with respect to risk–benefit relative to conventional therapeutic approaches (eg, salvage chemotherapy). Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Summary Background R-MegaCHOEP was the first phase 3 study comparing high-dose chemotherapy plus rituximab followed by autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with conventional chemotherapy plus rituximab in first-line therapy for patients aged 60 years or younger with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Little is known about the long-term outcomes of these patients. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of conventional chemotherapy versus high-dose chemotherapy after 10 years of follow-up in the R-MegaCHOEP trial. Methods In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done across 61 centres in Germany, patients aged 18–60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index [IPI] 2 or 3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1, using Pocock minimisation) to eight cycles of conventional chemotherapy (cyclosphosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisolone) plus rituximab (R-CHOEP-14) or four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy plus rituximab followed by autologous HSCT (R-MegaCHOEP). The trial was unmasked. Patients were stratified by age-adjusted IPI factors, presence of bulky disease (tumour mass ≥7·5 cm diameter), and treatment centre. The primary endpoint was event-free survival, analysed here 10 years after randomisation. 10-year overall survival, progression-free survival, conditional survival, relapse patterns, secondary malignancies, and molecular characteristics were also analysed. All analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00129090 . Findings Between March 3, 2003, and April 7, 2009, 275 patients were randomly assigned to R-CHOEP-14 (n=136) or R-MegaCHOEP (n=139). 130 patients in the R-CHOEP-14 group and 132 patients in the R-MegaCHOEP group were included in the intention-to-treat population. After a median follow-up of 9·3 years (IQR 5·1–11·1), 10-year event-free survival was 51% (95% CI 42–61) in the R-MegaCHOEP group and 57% (47–67) in the R-CHOEP-14 group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·3 [95% CI 0·9–1·8], p=0·23). 10-year progression-free survival was 59% (50–68) in the R-MegaCHOEP group and 60% (51–70) in the R-CHOEP-14 group (adjusted HR 1·1 [0·7–1·7], p=0·64). 10-year overall survival was 66% (57–76) in the R-MegaCHOEP group and 72% (63–81) in the R-CHOEP-14 group (adjusted HR 1·3 [0·8–2·1], p=0·26). Relapse occurred in 30 (16% [95% CI 11–22]) of 190 patients who had complete remission or unconfirmed complete remission; 17 (17%) of 100 patients in the R-CHOEP-14 group and 13 (14%) of 90 patients in the R-MegaCHOEP group. Seven (23%) of 30 patients had low-grade histology at relapse and had better outcomes compared with patients who relapsed with aggressive histologies. Lymphoma affected the CNS in 18 (28%) of 64 patients with treatment failure. 22 secondary malignancies were reported in the intention-to-treat population; in 12 (9%) of 127 patients in the R-CHOEP-14 group and ten (8%) of 126 patients in the R-MegaCHOEP group. Interpretation Event-free survival and overall survival were similar between groups after 10 years of follow-up; outcomes were not improved in the R-MegaCHOEP group by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT. Patients who relapsed with aggressive histology showed a high incidence of CNS involvement and poor prognosis. For these patients, novel therapies are greatly warranted. Funding Deutsche Krebshilfe (German Cancer Aid).

Background: Combined-modality treatment consisting of chemotherapy and consolidation radiotherapy is standard of care for patients with early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma. However, the use of radiotherapy can have long-term sequelae, which is of particular concern, as Hodgkin lymphoma is frequently diagnosed in young adults with a median age of approximately 30 years. In the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial, we investigated whether radiotherapy can be omitted without loss of efficacy in patients who have a complete metabolic response after receiving two cycles of escalated doses of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin, and regular doses of bleomycin, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) plus two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy (2 + 2). Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, patients (aged 18–60 years) with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma (all histologies) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were enrolled at 224 hospitals and private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either standard combined-modality treatment, consisting of the 2 + 2 regimen (eBEACOPP consisted of 1250 mg/m2 intravenous cyclophosphamide on day 1, 35 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin on day 1, 200 mg/m2 intravenous etoposide on days 1–3, 100 mg/m2 oral procarbazine on days 1–7, 40 mg/m2 oral prednisone on days 1–14, 1·4 mg/m2 intravenous vincristine on day 8 [maximum dose of 2 mg per cycle], and 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin on day 8; ABVD consisted of 25 mg/m2 intravenous doxorubicin, 10 mg/m2 intravenous bleomycin, 6 mg/m2 intravenous vinblastine, and 375 mg/m2 intravenous dacarbazine, all given on days 1 and 15) followed by 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (standard combined-modality treatment group) or PET4-guided treatment, consisting of the 2 + 2 regimen followed by 30 Gy of involved-node radiotherapy only in patients with positive PET at the end of four cycles of chemotherapy (PET4; PET4-guided treatment group). Randomisation was done centrally and used the minimisation method and seven stratification factors (centre, age, sex, clinical symptoms, disease localisation, albumin concentration, and bulky disease), and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until central review of the PET4 examination had been completed. With the final analysis presented here, the primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the PET4-guided strategy in a per-protocol analysis of the primary endpoint of progression-free survival. We defined non-inferiority as an absolute difference of 8% in the 5-year progression-free survival estimates between the two groups. Safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01356680. Findings: Between Jan 13, 2012, and March 21, 2017, we enrolled and randomly assigned 1100 patients to the standard combined-modality treatment group (n=548) or to the PET4-guided treatment group (n=552); two patients in each group were found ineligible after randomisation. At a median follow-up of 46·2 months (IQR 32·7–61·2), 5-year progression-free survival was 97·3% (95% CI 94·5–98·7) in the standard combined-modality treatment group and 95·1% (92·0–97·0) in the PET4-guided treatment group (hazard ratio 0·523 [95% CI 0·226–1·211]). The between-group difference was 2·2% (95% CI −0·9 to 5·3) and excluded the non-inferiority margin of 8%. The most common grade 3 or 4 acute haematological adverse events were leucopenia (436 [83%] of 528 patients in the standard combined-modality treatment group vs 443 [84%] of 529 patients in the PET4-guided treatment group) and thrombocytopenia (139 [26%] vs 176 [33%]), and the most frequent acute non-haematological toxic effects were infection (32 [6%] vs 40 [8%]) and nausea or vomiting (38 [7%] vs 29 [6%]). The most common acute radiotherapy-associated adverse events were dysphagia (26 [6%] in the standard combined-modality treatment group vs three [2%] in the PET4-guided treatment group) and mucositis (nine [2%] vs none). 229 serious adverse events were reported by 161 (29%) of 546 patients in the combined-modality treatment group, and 235 serious adverse events were reported by 164 (30%) of 550 patients in the PET4-guided treatment group. One suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction (infection) leading to death was reported in the PET4-guided treatment group. Interpretation: PET4-negativity after treatment with 2 + 2 chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed early-stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma allows omission of consolidation radiotherapy without a clinically relevant loss of efficacy. PET4-guided therapy could thereby reduce the proportion of patients at risk of the late effects of radiotherapy. Funding: Deutsche Krebshilfe.

In newly diagnosed systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, next-generation sequencing of plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) detects somatic mutations as accurate as genotyping of the tumor biopsy. A distinct diffuse large B-cell lymphoma entity confined to the central nervous system is primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), which requires intracerebral biopsy and neuropathologic analysis to establish the diagnosis. So far, a biomarker for diagnosis and follow-up of PCNSL that can be investigated in blood has not been identified. This article addresses the question whether somatic mutations of the CD79B and MYD88 driver genes of PCNSL can be detected in cfDNA at disease diagnosis. Stereotactic biopsies and cfDNA of 27 PCNSL patients were analyzed for CD79B and MYD88 mutations. As control, cfDNA derived from six healthy volunteers was used. CD79B and MYD88 hot spot mutations were identified in 16 of 27 (59%) and 23 of 27 (85%) PCNSL biopsies, respectively, but only in 0 of 27 (0%) and 1 of 27 (4%) corresponding cfDNA samples, respectively. In cfDNA of one of four patients with Waldenstrom disease, as a further control, the MYD88 L265P mutation was readily detected, despite complete clinical remission. These data suggest that in PCNSL even if they carry such mutations, alterations of CD79B and MYD88 cannot be reliably detected in blood-derived cfDNA obtained before intracerebral biopsy.

Summary Background A high proportion of patients with relapsed classical Hodgkin's lymphoma achieve a response with the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin, and the drug is well tolerated. We modified the escalated BEACOPP regimen (eBEACOPP; bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) and implemented brentuximab vedotin with the aim to reduce toxic effects while maintaining the protocol's efficacy. Methods We did an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study at 20 study sites in Germany. Adult patients (aged 18–60 years) with newly diagnosed, advanced, classical Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment with six cycles of either BrECAPP (brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg on day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m 2 on days 2–4, doxorubicin 35 mg/m 2 on day 2, cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m 2 on day 2, procarbazine 100 mg/m 2 on days 2–8, and prednisone 40 mg/m 2 on days 2–15) or BrECADD (brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg on day 1, etoposide 150 mg/m 2 on days 2–4, doxorubicin 40 mg/m 2 on day 2, cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m 2 on day 2, dacarbazine 250 mg/m 2 on days 3–4, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 2–5). Randomisation was done centrally by stratified minimisation, with study site and sex as stratification factors. The co-primary endpoints were complete response to chemotherapy and complete remission at the end of treatment, which were assessed by intention to treat. Patients who were found not to meet inclusion criteria after randomisation or without restaging data after two cycles of study treatment were excluded from the primary endpoint analysis. All patients who started study treatment were assessable for safety. This report presents the final analysis at a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13·2–21·5). The preplanned 2-year follow-up analysis is yet to be reported. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01569204. Findings Between Oct 26, 2012, and May 15, 2014, 104 patients were enrolled to the study (52 were assigned to each study arm). Two patients dropped out before the start of study treatment because of acute infection (n=1) and withdrawal of consent (n=1) and one patient was excluded because of intermediate-stage disease (all were assigned BrECAPP). 42 (86%, 95% CI 73–94) of 49 patients assigned BrECAPP achieved a complete response after chemotherapy and 46 (94%, 95% CI 83–99) had complete remission as their final treatment outcome. In the BrECADD group, 46 (88%, 95% CI 77–96) of 52 patients achieved both a complete response after chemotherapy and complete remission as their final treatment outcome. 58 serious adverse events were reported, 32 events in 21 of 50 patients who received BrECAPP and 26 events in 18 of 52 patients who received BrECADD. The most common grade 3–4 toxic effects were haematological adverse events (91 [89%] of 102 patients). Grade 3–4 organ toxic effects were reported in seven (17%) of 42 patients assigned BrECAPP and two (4%) of 46 allocated BrECADD. 16 (32%) of 50 patients assigned BrECAPP and 18 (35%) of 52 allocated BrECADD had grade 1–2 peripheral neuropathy, and one (2%) patient assigned BrECAPP developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; all but one case (allocated BrECAPP) resolved. No deaths were reported during the follow-up period. Interpretation Both eBEACOPP variants met the co-primary efficacy endpoints. Particularly, the BrECADD regimen was associated with a more favourable toxicity profile and was, therefore, selected to challenge standard eBEACOPP for the treatment of advanced classical Hodgkin's lymphoma in the phase 3 HD21 study by the German Hodgkin Study Group (NCT02661503), which aims to further reduce treatment-related morbidity. Funding Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

IF 11.855; International audience; Background:Novel agents are changing the treatment of relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Nevertheless, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) are considered standard of care in eligible patients. To identify patients who could benefit most from novel therapeutic approaches, we investigated a comprehensive set of risk factors (RFs) for survival after ASCT.Methods:In this multinational prognostic multivariable modeling study, 23 potential RFs were retrospectively evaluated in HL patients from nine prospective trials with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses (part I). The resulting prognostic score was then validated in an independent clinical sample (part II).Results:In part I, we identified 656 patients treated for relapsed/refractory HL between 1993 and 2013 with a median follow-up of 60 months after ASCT. The majority of potential RFs had significant impact on progression-free survival (PFS) with hazard ratios (HR) ranging from 1.39 to 2.22. The multivariable analysis identified stage IV disease, time to relapse ≤3 months, ECOG performance status ≥1, bulk ≥5 cm and inadequate response to salvage chemotherapy [

Summary Background Advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma represents a heterogeneous group of patients with different risk profiles. Data suggests that interim PET assessment during chemotherapy is superior to baseline international prognostic scoring in terms of predicting long-term treatment outcome in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. We therefore hypothesised that early interim PET-imaging after two courses of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) might be suitable for guiding treatment in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. We aimed to assess whether intensifying standard chemotherapy (BEACOPP escalated ) by adding rituximab would improve progression-free survival in patients with positive PET after two courses of chemotherapy. Methods In this open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 study, we recruited patients aged 18–60 years with newly diagnosed, advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma from 160 hospitals and 77 private practices in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic. Interim PET-imaging was done after two cycles of BEACOPP escalated and centrally assessed by an expert panel. Patients with a positive PET after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated chemotherapy (PET-2) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six additional courses of either BEACOPP escalated (BEACOPP escalated group) or BEACOPP escalated plus rituximab (R-BEACOPP escalated group). PET-2 was assessed using a 5-point scale with 18 FDG uptake higher than the mediastinal blood pool (corresponding to Deauville scale 3) defined as positive. BEACOPP escalated was given as previously described; rituximab was given intravenously at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 (maximum total dose 700 mg), the first administration starting 24 h before starting the fourth cycle of BEACOPP escalated (day 0 and day 3 in cycle 4, day 1 in cycles 5–8). Randomisation was done centrally and used the minimisation method including a random component, stratified according to centre, age, stage, international prognostic score, and sex. The primary efficacy endpoint was 5 year progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. We are reporting this second planned interim analysis as the final report of the trial. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00515554. Findings Between May 14, 2008, and May 31, 2011, we enrolled 1100 patients. 440 patients had a positive PET-2 and were randomly assigned to either the BEACOPP escalated group (n=220) or the R-BEACOPP escalated group (n=220). With a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 25–42) for progression-free survival, estimated 3 year progression-free survival was 91·4% (95% CI 87·0–95·7) for patients in the BEACOPP escalated group and 93·0% (89·4–96·6) for those in the R-BEACOPP escalated group (difference 1·6%, 95% CI −4·0 to 7·3; log rank p=0·99). Common grade 3–4 adverse events were leucopenia (207 [95%] of 218 patients in the BEACOPP escalated group vs 211 [96%] of 220 patients in the R-BEACOPP escalated group), and severe infections (51 [23%] vs 43 [20%] patients). Based on a futility analysis, the independent data monitoring committee recommended publication of this second planned interim analysis as the final result. Six (3%) of 219 patients in the BEACOPP escalated group and ten (5%) of 220 in the R-BEACOPP escalated group died; fatal treatment-related toxic effects occurred in one ( escalated group and three (1%) in the R-BEACOPP escalated group, all of them due to infection. Interpretation The addition of rituximab to BEACOPP escalated did not improve the progression-free survival of PET-2 positive patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, progression-free survival for PET-2 positive patients was much better than expected, exceeding even the outcome of PET-2-unselected patients in the previous HD15 trial. Thus, PET-2 cannot identify patients at high-risk for treatment failure in the context of the very effective German Hodgkin Study Group standard treatment for advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. Funding Deutsche Krebshilfe; Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI); and Roche Pharma.

Background: Six cycles of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone) or R-CHOP-like chemotherapy are the standard treatment for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We hypothesized that four cycles of CHOP plus six applications of rituximab (4x R-CHOP+2xR) are non-inferior to six cycles of R-CHOP in a population with favorable prognosis. Methods: We randomized patients 18 to 60 years of age, stage I-II disease, normal serum lactate dehydrogenase concentration, good ECOG performance status 0-1, without bulky disease (maximal tumor diameter

Background Tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, has demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) in the global, multicenter, pivotal, phase 2, JULIET trial (NCT02445248). The primary endpoint, overall response rate (ORR), was met at the interim analysis (ORR: 59% [CR, 43%; PR, 16%]). Here, we report an updated analysis with a median 19 mo follow-up. Methods Adult pts ≥18 y with r/r DLBCL that had progressed after ≥2 lines of therapy including rituximab and an anthracycline and who were ineligible for or failed autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) were enrolled. Tisagenlecleucel was manufactured from autologous T cells at 2 facilities (Morris Plains, NJ, USA [main cohort]. and Leipzig, Germany [cohort A]) and provided to pts at 27 treatment centers in 10 countries across the globe. Efficacy analyses include all pts with ≥3 mo of follow-up or earlier discontinuation. Safety analyses include all infused pts. Results In the JULIET study, 115 pts (99 in main cohort; 16 in cohort A) received a single dose of tisagenlecleucel infusion as of 21 May 2018. Prior to infusion, 90% of infused pts received bridging chemotherapy and 93% received lymphodepletion chemotherapy. Pts were a median 56 y (range, 22-76 y); 77% of pts had stage III/IV and 17% had double/triple-hit disease at the time of entry. Approximately half (51%) of pts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy (range, 1-6); 49% received prior ASCT. ORR was 54% (40% CR, 13% PR; 95% CI, 43%-64%) with a median follow-up of 19.3 mo post-infusion. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. The relapse-free probability was 66% (95% CI, 51%-78%) at 6 mo and 64% (95% CI, 48%-76%) at 12 or 18 mo. Consistent ORR was reported across prognostic subgroups (eg, prior ASCT; double/triple-hit lymphoma) and DOR was similar among age groups and disease status (Figure). Median OS was not reached for pts in CR and was 11.1 mo (95% CI, 6.6 mo-NE) for all infused pts. The probability of OS was 48% (95% CI, 38%-57%) at 12 mo and 43% (95% CI, 33%-53%) at 18 mo (max follow-up, 29 mo). No pts proceeded to allogeneic SCT or ASCT while in remission. During the first 8 wks post-infusion, grade 3/4 adverse events of special interest were cytopenias lasting >28 days (34%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 23%, by the Penn scale), infections (19%), febrile neutropenia (15%), neurologic events (11%; 1 case of grade 2 cerebral edema), and tumor lysis syndrome (2%). Tocilizumab was administered to 16% of pts with CRS, and no treatment-related death was reported. Conclusions This updated analysis with longer follow-up confirms earlier findings. Tisagenlecleucel produced a durable high ORR, consistent efficacy across all predefined subgroups, and had a manageable safety profile in pts with r/r DLBCL.

Background Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint in the JULIET study (NCT02445248), a phase 2 trial evaluating a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Earlier analyses showed improvements in QoL at month (mo) 3 and 6 (Maziarz et al, ASH 2017, EBMT 2018). We report updated JULIET data with extended follow-up (FU; median: 19.3 mo). Methods Pts were aged ≥18 years with r/r DLBCL after ≥2 lines of therapy and either failed or were ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT). At baseline, mo-3 through mo-24, pts completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) and Short Form-36 Health Survey v2 (SF-36). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Results Of the 167 enrolled pts, 115 pts were infused with tisagenlecleucel before data cutoff; 96% had previously received ≥2 systemic therapies and 49% had relapsed after SCT. QoL instruments were completed by 108 pts (94%) at baseline, including 50 patients who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Of pts eligible for analysis with CR or PR, 26 and 21 completed the assessments at mo-12 and -18, respectively. Scores of pts with CR or PR (mean change at baseline through mo-18) indicated sustained improvements in all categories (Table 1). Similar trends were observed for SF-36. Conclusions With long term FU, pts with r/r DLBCL responding to tisagenlecleucel continue to show sustained improvements in QoL.

The key question in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma for many years now has been, should intensified chemotherapy be applied upfront or be reserved for relapsing patients. The early intensification approach with BEACOPP(escalated) (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) aims at curing patients with first-line chemotherapy definitely. The added toxicity of this approach as compared to less intensive regimens as ABDV (doxorubicin, bleomycin, dacarbazine, vinblastine) is mainly restricted to acute haematotoxicity and gonadal damage. However, regarding efficacy, there is a meaningful survival-benefit over ABVD (10% at 5years) and the intensified first-line treatment strategy is thus rightly regarded as standard of care.

Background Treatment options for patients with nonbulky stage IA-IIA Hodgkin lymphoma include combined modality therapy (CMT) using doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) plus involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT), and chemotherapy with ABVD alone. There are no mature randomized data comparing ABVD with CMT using modern radiation techniques. Patients and methods Using German Hodgkin Study Group HD10/HD11 and NCIC Clinical Trials Group HD.6 databases, we identified 588 patients who met mutually inclusive eligibility criteria from the preferred arms of HD10 or 11 (n = 406) and HD.6 (n = 182). We evaluated time to progression (TTP), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, including in three predefined exploratory subset analyses. Results With median follow-up of 91 (HD10/11) and 134 (HD.6) months, respective 8-year outcomes were for TTP, 93% versus 87% [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24-0.78]; for PFS, 89% versus 86% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.42-1.18) and for overall survival, 95% versus 95% (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.49-2.40). In the exploratory subset analysis including HD10 eligible patients who achieved complete response (CR) or unconfirmed complete response (CRu) after two cycles of ABVD, 8-year PFS was 87% (HD10) versus 95% (HD.6) (HR 2.8; 95% CI 0.64-12.5) and overall survival 96% versus 100%. In contrast, among those without CR/CRu after two cycles of ABVD, 8-year PFS was 88% versus 74% (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.79) and overall survival 95% versus 91%, respectively (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.12-1.44). Conclusions In patients with nonbulky stage IA-IIA Hodgkin lymphoma, CMT provides better disease control than ABVD alone, especially among those not achieving complete response after two cycles of ABVD. Within the follow-up duration evaluated, overall survivals were similar. Longer follow-up is required to understand the implications of radiation and chemotherapy-related late effects. Clinical trials The trials included in this analysis were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: HD10 - NCT00265018, HD11 - NCT00264953, HD.6 - NCT00002561.

Background In early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), treatment according to the early favorable or unfavorable subgroup is guided by staging definitions, which differ between various study groups worldwide. We analyzed risk factors used in different international staging systems and their impact on the outcome of early-stage HL patients. Patients and methods In 1173 early-stage HL patients treated homogenously within the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) trials HD10 and HD11, the impact of three staging systems developed and used by the GHSG, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in discriminating risk groups for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed and the relevance of their single risk factors was investigated. Results All the three staging systems defined an unfavorable risk group out of early-stage patients of comparable size (56%, 55%, and 57%), having a significantly poorer PFS and OS as compared with the corresponding favorable group; 5-year differences between early favorable and early unfavorable in terms of PFS were 9.4% (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.74–3.91), 6.7% (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.41–3.13), and 8.6% (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.45–3.16) with the GHSG, EORTC, and NCCN definition, respectively. Sensitivity was high for all systems (84%, 79%, and 83%); however, there was a low specificity with high rates of false-positive results (1-specificity 54%, 53%, and 55%, respectively). Models of high sensitivity included risk factors associated with large tumor burden and high tumor activity. Most risk factors for tumor-specific end points were also predictive of OS. Conclusions Differentiating between a favorable and an unfavorable risk group has significant impact on PFS and OS in early-stage HL patients in the modern treatment era. Risk-adapted treatment strategies using new risk factors with higher specificity are needed.

Patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma might have persistent fatigue even years after treatment. However, knowledge of the development of fatigue persisting long after completion of treatment is limited. Therefore, we did a detailed analysis of fatigue in our first-line clinical trials for early-stage favourable (HD13 trial), early-stage unfavourable (HD14 trial), and advanced-stage (HD15 trial) Hodgkin's lymphoma. Beyond the description of fatigue from diagnosis up to 5 years after treatment, we aimed to assess any effect of patient characteristics, disease characteristics, or treatment characteristics on persistent fatigue.In this longitudinal study, we included patients with early-stage favourable, early-stage unfavourable, and advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma from the HD13, HD14, and HD15 trials, respectively, aged between 18 and 60 years. Eligible patients for these trials had newly diagnosed, histologically proven Hodgkin's lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, HIV negativity, and absence of comorbidity disallowing protocol treatment. We used the fatigue scale of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire to assess fatigue from diagnosis up to 5 years after the end of treatment. The primary outcomes of interest in this study were fatigue scores in the second and fifth year after end of treatment. We estimated the effect of different disease, patient, and treatment characteristics on fatigue with multiple regression analyses and identified fatigue trajectories with growth mixture models. The regression analyses and growth mixture models used robust and full information maximum likelihood estimates to account for missing data. The HD13, HD14, and HD15 trials are registered as international standard randomised controlled trials, ISRCTN63474366, ISRCTN04761296, and ISRCTN32443041, respectively.The HD13 trial enrolled patients with early-stage favourable disease from Jan 28, 2003, to Sept 30, 2009; the HD14 trial enrolled patients with early-stage unfavourable disease from Jan 28, 2003, to Dec 23, 2009; and the HD15 trial enrolled patients with advanced-stage disease from Jan 28, 2003, to April 18, 2008. 5306 patients were enrolled in these trials. We analysed 4215 patients with any valid fatigue assessment up to 5 years after the end of treatment. Patients with higher tumour burden at diagnosis had more fatigue at baseline (mean fatigue score in HD13: 30·8 [SD 28·0]; in HD14: 39·8 [29·4], and in HD15: 49·0 [30·2]). Fatigue scores (FA) in the second year after the end of treatment were 28·5 (24·7) in HD13, 28·8 (24·4) in HD14, and 30·7 (24·4) in HD15; in the fifth year after the end of treatment FA was 30·8 (26·0) in HD13, 27·1 (24·8) in HD14, and 28·2 (24·9) in HD15. Predictors of fatigue in the second and fifth year after end of treatment were baseline fatigue (p0·0001) and age as a continuous variable (p0·0001). In addition to preceding fatigue and age, patient sex and Hodgkin's lymphoma specific risk factors at baseline did not consistently and significantly improve the prognosis of fatigue in the first, second, and fifth year after end of treatment. There was no significant effect of treatment on fatigue scores in the second and fifth year after treatment.Our findings show a high incidence of severe acute and persistent fatigue in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors, which is largely independent of tumour stage and treatment. Our results contribute to a better understanding of fatigue in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors and could inform development of urgently needed intervention strategies.Deutsche Krebshilfe.

Background To evaluate long-term toxicity and efficacy of a combined modality strategy including extended-field radiotherapy (EF-RT) or involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT), the German Hodgkin Study Group carried out a follow-up analysis in patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Patients and methods One thousand two hundred and four patients were randomized to four cycles of chemotherapy followed by either 30 Gy EF- or 30 Gy IF-RT (HD8 trial); 532 patients in each treatment arm were eligible. Results At 10 years, no arm differences were revealed with respect to freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) (79.8% versus 79.7%), progression-free survival (79.8% versus 80.0%), and overall survival (86.4% versus 87.3%). Non-inferiority of IF-RT was demonstrated for the primary end point FFTF (95% confidence interval for hazard ratio 0.72–1.25). Elderly patients had a poorer outcome when treated with EF-RT. So far, 15.0% of patients in arm A and 12.2% in arm B died, mostly due to secondary malignancies (5.3% versus 3.4%) or HL (3.2% versus 3.4%). After EF-RT, there were more secondary malignancies overall (58 versus 45), especially acute myeloid leukemias (11 versus 4). Conclusion Radiotherapy intensity reduction to IF-RT does not result in poorer long-term outcome but is associated with less acute toxicity and might be associated with less secondary malignancies.

BACKGROUND: The intensity of chemotherapy and need for additional radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has been unclear. We did a prospective randomised clinical trial comparing two reduced-intensity chemotherapy variants with our previous standard regimen. Chemotherapy was followed by PET-guided radiotherapy.METHODS: In this parallel group, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority trial (HD15), 2182 patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma aged 18-60 years were randomly assigned to receive either eight cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) (8×B(esc) group), six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) (6×B(esc) group), or eight cycles of BEACOPP(14) (8×B(14) group). Randomisation (1:1:1) was done centrally by stratified minimisation. Non-inferiority of the primary endpoint, freedom from treatment failure, was assessed using repeated CIs for the hazard ratio (HR) according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients with a persistent mass after chemotherapy measuring 2·5 cm or larger and positive on PET scan received additional radiotherapy with 30 Gy; the negative predictive value for tumour recurrence of PET at 12 months was an independent endpoint. This trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN32443041.FINDINGS: Of the 2182 patients enrolled in the study, 2126 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis set, 705 in the 8×B(esc) group, 711 in the 6×B(esc) group, and 710 in the 8×B(14) group. Freedom from treatment failure was sequentially non-inferior for the 6×B(esc) and 8×B(14) groups as compared with 8×B(esc). 5-year freedom from treatment failure rates were 84·4% (97·5% CI 81·0-87·7) for the 8×B(esc) group, 89·3% (86·5-92·1) for 6×B(esc) group, and 85·4% (82·1-88·7) for the 8×B(14) group (97·5% CI for difference between 6×B(esc) and 8×B(esc) was 0·5-9·3). Overall survival in the three groups was 91·9%, 95·3%, and 94·5% respectively, and was significantly better with 6×B(esc) than with 8×B(esc) (97·5% CI 0·2-6·5). The 8×B(esc) group showed a higher mortality (7·5%) than the 6×B(esc) (4·6%) and 8×B(14) (5·2%) groups, mainly due to differences in treatment-related events (2·1%, 0·8%, and 0·8%, respectively) and secondary malignancies (1·8%, 0·7%, and 1·1%, respectively). The negative predictive value for PET at 12 months was 94·1% (95% CI 92·1-96·1); and 225 (11%) of 2126 patients received additional radiotherapy.INTERPRETATION: Treatment with six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) followed by PET-guided radiotherapy was more effective in terms of freedom from treatment failure and less toxic than eight cycles of the same chemotherapy regimen. Thus, six cycles of BEACOPP(escalated) should be the treatment of choice for advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. PET done after chemotherapy can guide the need for additional radiotherapy in this setting.FUNDING: Deutsche Krebshilfe and the Swiss Federal Government.

Background: The reduction of treatment-related toxic effects is the main goal in the current trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). In this regard, the protection of the ovarian reserve in young women is very important. Therefore, the GHSG investigated the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone-analogues (GnRH-a) and oral contraceptives (OC) in young women with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Patients and methods: Women (18–40 years) were randomly assigned either to receive daily OC or monthly GnRH-a during escalated combination therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc). Hormonal levels were determined at baseline, during therapy, and at follow-up. Results: The study was closed prematurely after an interim analysis of 12 patients in arm A (OC) and 11 in arm B (GnRH-a), 9 and 10 are assessable for the primary end point. Women’s median age was 25 years in both arms. The anti-Mullerian hormone level after at least 12 months was reduced in all patients. For the entire study cohort, the respective ovarian follicle preservation rate was 0% (95% confidence interval 0% to 12%). Conclusion: We observed no protection of the ovarian reserve with hormonal co-treatment during BEACOPPesc. This result supports efforts of ongoing trials to reduce chemotherapy intensity and toxicity. Alternative strategies for the protection of fertility must be offered to young female HL patients before the start of BEACOPPesc therapy.

SummaryThe activity of natural killer (NK) cells is regulated by surface receptors, which direct target cell recognition. NKp30 (Natural Cytotoxicity Receptor 3) induces target cell lysis and is also crucial for the interaction with dendritic cells. So far, the cellular ligands for NKp30 have remained elusive. Here we show that the nuclear factor HLA-B-associated transcript 3 (BAT3) was released from tumor cells, bound directly to NKp30, and engaged NKp30 on NK cells. BAT3 triggered NKp30-mediated cytotoxicity and was necessary for tumor rejection in a multiple myeloma model. These data identify BAT3 as a cellular ligand for NKp30. We propose a concept for target cell recognition by NK cells beyond “missing self” and “induced self,” mediated through a tumor cell-derived extracellular factor.

Background Immunotoxins (ITs) consist of cell binding ligands coupled to toxins or their subunits. Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is an excellent target for ITs since lymphocyte activation markers such as CD25 and CD30 are expressed in large numbers. The ITs RFT5.dgA (anti CD25) and Ki-4.dgA (anti CD30) were constructed by linking the monoclonal antibodies RFT5 and Ki-4 to deglycosylated ricin A-chain (dgA). Both ITs showed potent specific activity against HL cells in vitro and in vivo in animal models, and were subsequently evaluated in phase I/II clinical trials in humans. Patients and methods In two separate trials, the ITs were administered i.v. four times every other day over 4 h. The objectives of the phase I trials included the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity and immune response against the IT. Results Twenty-seven patients with refractory HL were included in the phase I/II study of RFT5.dgA and 17 patients were included in the phase I study of Ki-4.dgA. The MTD of RFT5.dgA was 15 mg/m2, whereas that of Ki-4.dgA was 5 mg/m2. DLTs were related to vascular leak syndrome, consisting of edema, tachycardia, dyspnea, weakness and myalgia. Measurement of serum levels of RFT5.dgA demonstrated a Cmax of 0.2–9.7 µg/ml with a half-life (t½) varying from 4 to 10.5 h. Peak serum concentration of Ki-4.dgA ranged from 0.23 to 1.7 µg/ml. In both trials ∼60% of patients developed human anti-mouse and/or anti-dgA antibodies. Seventeen of 18 patients treated at the MTD of RFT5.dgA were evaluable for clinical response. Responses included two partial remissions (PR), one minor response (MR) and five stable diseases (SD). Fifteen of 17 patients treated with Ki-4.dgA were evaluable for clinical response. Responses included one PR, one MR and two SD. Conclusions RFT5.dgA and Ki-4.dgA showed moderate efficacy in heavily pretreated refractory patients with HL. Ki-4.dgA was less well tolerated than RFT5.dgA. This might be due, at least in part, to the formation of Ki-4.dgA/sCD30 complexes.

Many new approaches involving antibody‐based agents have given promising results in experimental Hodgkin's disease (HD) models. Clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins, bispecific constructs and radioimmunoconjugates have demonstrated some clinical efficacy in patients with advanced refractory HD. Although it seems unlikely that resistant patients with larger tumor masses will be cured by either of these approaches, it might be feasible to treat bulky disease by conventional therapy and then administer biological agents to kill residual Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg cells. Future phase III trials will have to prove a possible superior effect of this combined immunochemotherapy. Currently, the evaluation of the most promising approaches continues.

CD30 is a therapeutic target in the management of patients with elapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and systemic naplastic large-cell lymphoma (sALCL). Brentuximab vedotin has emonstrated efficacy in the management of patients with R/R HL nd sALCL, and may potentially be relevant in the management of ther CD30+ lymphomas. This webcast is of a satellite symposium hat takes the form of a forum and serves as a platform for lookng at the latest clinical trials and exchanging information on the aily management of CD30+ lymphomas. It includes several case nd panel discussions, as well as some interactive dialogue with he audience. Discussions include current medical needs in the treatment of D30+ haematological malignancies and current ongoing clinical rial data (including efficacy and safety) on novel treatment strateies for patients with HL, sALCL, and peripheral T-cell lymphoma PTCL). The selection of eligible patients and optimal management f patients with R/R HL or sALCL receiving brentuximab vedotin n daily practice are addressed, including patient eligibility, dosng, optimal number of cycles, retreatment, and the management f side effects. Ongoing clinical trials in the use of CD30-targeted