Search

© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology.The advancing edge profile is a powerful determinant of tumor behavior in many organs. In this study, a grading system assessing the tumor-host interface was developed and tested in 181 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), 63 of which were

Quantitating hepatic steatosis is important in many liver diseases and liver transplantation. Since steatosis estimation by pathologists has inherent intra- and inter-observer variability, we compared and contrasted computerized techniques with magnetic resonance imaging measurements, pathologist visual scoring, and clinical parameters. Computerized methods applied to whole slide images included a commercial positive pixel count algorithm and a custom algorithm programmed at our institution. For all liver samples (n=59), including pediatric, adult, frozen section, and permanent specimens, statistically significant correlations were observed between pathology, radiology, and each image analysis modality (r=0.75-0.97, p

Tumors of the ampulla-pancreatobiliary tract are encountered increasingly; however, their staging can be highly challenging due to lack of familiarity. In this review article, the various issues encountered in staging of these tumors at the pathologic level are evaluated and possible solutions for daily practice as well as potential improvements for future staging protocols are discussed. While N-stage parameters have now been well established (the number of lymph nodes required in pancreatoduodenectomies is 12), the T-staging has several issues: for the pancreas, the discovery of small cancers arising in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) necessitates the creation of substages of T1 (as T1a, b, and c); lack of proper definition of "peripancreatic soft tissue" and "common bile duct involvement" (as to which part is meant) makes T3 highly subjective. Increasing resectability of main vessels (portal vein) brings the need to redefine a "T" for such cases. For the ampulla, due to factors like anatomic complexity of the region and the under-appreciation of three-dimensional spread of the tumors in this area (in particular, the frequent extension into periduodenal soft tissues and duodenal serosa, which are not addressed in the current system and which require specific grossing approaches to document), the current T-staging lacks reproducibility and clinical relevance, and therefore, major revisions are needed. Recently proposed refined definition and site-specific subclassification of ampullary tumors highlight the areas for improvement. For the extrahepatic bile ducts, the staging schemes that use the depth of invasion may be more practical to circumvent the inconsistencies in the histologic layering of the ducts; better definition of terms like "periductal spread" is needed. For the gallbladder, since many gallbladder cancers are "unapparent" (found in clinically and grossly unsuspected cholecystectomies), establishing proper grossing protocols and adequate sampling are crucial. Since the gallbladder does not have the distinct layering of the other gastrointestinal organs, the definitions of Tis/T1a/T1b lack practicality, and therefore, "early gallbladder carcinoma" category proposed in high-risk regions may have to be recognized instead. Involvement of the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses should be a part of the evaluation and management of these early gallbladder cancers; for advanced cancers, documentation of hepatic versus serosal involvement is necessary. In summary, T-staging of ampulla-pancreatobiliary tract tumors has many challenges. Proper grossing and appreciation of histo-anatomic subtleties of this region are crucial in addressing these issues and achieving more applicable and clinically relevant staging systems in the future.

A morphological variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma forming large ductal elements, large duct type ductal adenocarcinoma, is documented and its clinicopathological features are studied. These tumors may have microcystic and papillary growth patterns that closely mimic the non-invasive cystic and papillary pancreatic tumors such as: intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasia, including the oncocytic variant, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and ducts involved by pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. In a review of 230 pancreatectomy specimens with ductal adenocarcinoma, 28 (8%) cases of large duct type ductal adenocarcinomas were identified according to following criteria: more than 50% of the tumor sections available for examination contained infiltrative ducts with a diameter larger than 0.5 mm or had a macroscopically identifiable microcystic pattern. Overall characteristics of large duct type ductal adenocarcinomas were not too different than those of conventional ductal adenocarcinomas, except that there was a slight female predominance in the former (F/M=2.3). The mean age was 67 (vs 63 in conventional ductal adenocarcinomas; P=0.015), and occurrence in the tail was slightly more common (40% vs 18% in conventional ductal adenocarcinomas; P=0.006). Grossly, cysts measuring up to 1 cm was noted in 10 cases. Microscopically, large duct type adenocarcinomas were characterized by irregularly distributed large ducts with jagged edges, lined by columnar mucinous cells often having deceptively bland cytological features and variable degrees of papillomatosis. Stromal desmoplasia had a hypercellular quality (morphologically distinct from ovarian-like stroma) in four cases, and had a myxoid quality in others. KRAS oncogene mutation was identified in 9 out of 11 cases. Median, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 16 months, 77% and 30%, respectively, as opposed to 12 months, 52% and 30%, respectively, in conventional ductal adenocarcinoma. In conclusion, it should be recognized that, some (8%) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas exhibit a large duct pattern that may microscopically mimic non-invasive pancreatic tumors characterized by cystic and papillary patterns. They may be distinguished by the relatively smaller size of the cysts, irregularity of the duct contours, clustering of the ducts, presence of intraluminal neutrophils and granular debris, degree of cytological pleomorphism, and myxoid quality of the stroma. Clinical behavior appears to be slightly better than that of conventional ductal adenocarcinoma, which may be accounted by the well-differentiated nature of these tumors.