Search

Endoscope-assisted surgery is becoming a preferred technique in salivary gland surgery. However, this technique has not yet been applied in submandibular gland (SMG) preservation surgery. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of endoscope-assisted gland-preserving surgery through a hairline incision in patients with benign SMG tumours. The study included 38 patients with benign SMG tumours who underwent tumour excision with gland preservation: 19 who underwent local excision of the tumour through an endoscope-assisted hairline approach and 19 who received the conventional cervical approach. The feasibility of the surgical procedure, perioperative patient variables, and postoperative appearance and functional outcomes were evaluated. Patients in both groups had their tumours removed successfully with tumour-free margins. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative amount of drainage, mean length of the incision, and unstimulated saliva flow rate did not differ between the two groups. There was no difference in the stimulated saliva flow rate between the preserved gland and unaffected SMG. The aesthetic result was better in the endoscope-assisted hairline incision group. No tumour recurrence occurred during follow-up (range 12-52 months). Thus, gland-preserving tumour dissection appears to be a safe method for benign SMG tumours, with good functional results. Furthermore, the endoscope-assisted hairline incision is a feasible method with excellent cosmetic results.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of occlusion-driven maxillary reconstruction with the deep circumflex iliac artery (DCIA) flap, using computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology and intraoral anastomosis. The data of 11 patients who underwent occlusion-driven maxillary reconstruction with this method between December 2018 and December 2020 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative complications and functional and aesthetic outcomes were recorded. The accuracy of the postoperative restoration was assessed using Geomagic Control 2014. Reconstruction was successful in nine patients; all were satisfied with their aesthetic and functional outcomes. One patient underwent extraoral anastomosis after failure of intraoral anastomosis. In another patient, the DCIA flap had to be removed after the operation because of flap failure. Among the 10 patients with DCIA flap success, colour map analysis showed a mean deviation of 0.40 ± 0.08 mm between the preoperative and postoperative craniomaxillary models. Thus, occlusion-driven maxillary reconstruction with the DCIA flap, using CAD/CAM technology and intraoral anastomosis, appears to be a feasible and accurate method for the repair of maxillary defects.

The purpose of this ambispective study was to investigate whether deep learning-based automatic segmentation and landmark detection, the SkullEngine, could be used for orthognathic surgical planning. Sixty-one sets of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were automatically inferred for midface, mandible, upper and lower teeth, and 68 landmarks. The experimental group included automatic segmentation and landmarks, while the control group included manual ones that were previously used to plan orthognathic surgery. The qualitative analysis of segmentation showed that all of the automatic results could be used for computer-aided surgical simulation. Among these, 98.4% of midface, 70.5% of mandible, 98.4% of upper teeth, and 93.4% of lower teeth could be directly used without manual revision. The Dice similarity coefficient was 96% and the average symmetric surface distance was 0.1 mm for all four structures. With SkullEngine, it took 4 minutes to complete the automatic segmentation and an additional 10 minutes for a manual touchup. The results also showed the overall mean difference between the two groups was 2.3 mm for the midface and 2.4 mm for the mandible. In summary, the authors believe that automatic segmentation using SkullEngine is ready for daily practice. However, the accuracy of automatic landmark digitization needs to be improved.

Craniomaxillofacial surgery has been experiencing a deep conceptual change in surgical planning over the last decade, with virtual reality technologies becoming widely adopted. The high demand has led to an exponential increase in available software. The aim of this review was to outline the current literature and provide evidence on the most used software for virtual surgical planning (VSP), and also to define contemporary knowledge on which procedures are more ready candidates for VSP. A search was performed in the major databases, and screening of the results according to the PRISMA statement identified 535 articles reporting the implementation of preoperative VSP during the years 2010-2020. A total of 77 different software programs were identified. The surgical procedures were assigned a standardized nomenclature and further simplified into 10 categories for analysis: temporomandibular joint (TMJ), implants (IMPL), malformations (MALF), reconstruction (REC), oncology (ONCO), oral surgery (ORAL), orthognathic surgery (ORTH), cranial surgery (CRANIO), trauma (TRAUMA), miscellaneous (OTHER). The journals they were reported in and the sample size of each study were also investigated. The results showed that the Materialise suite was the most widespread tool for VSP, with a prevalence of 36.3%, followed by the Geomagic family. Several packages were found to be associated with a specific type of surgical procedure. This review offers a synopsis of the array of VSP software reported in the literature and sets the basis for an informed, evidence-based use of this software in craniomaxillofacial surgery.

The aim of this study was to perform a timewise meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of short implants (≤6 mm) versus lateral sinus floor augmentation followed by regular implants (≥10 mm) in the deficient posterior maxilla. Eleven RCTs with 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up were reported in 21 articles. There was no significant difference in the implant loss rate at the patient level after 1 and 3 years between the two groups (risk ratio 0.50, P = 0.17; risk ratio 1.71, P = 0.51). After 5 years, the risk ratio was in favour of regular implants with augmentation and approached significance (3.28, P = 0.06). Excluding the results of two studies on ultrashort implants, the risk ratio for complications was in favour of short implants, but without significance (0.33, P = 0.08). Mean marginal bone loss was significantly lower at 1, 3, and 5 years for the short implants when compared to regular implants with augmentation. The residual osseointegration length of implants was between 3.4 mm and 5.9 mm in the short implants group and between 10.1 mm and 12.5 mm in the regular implants group after 5 years. In conclusion, short implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla demonstrate comparable outcomes to regular implants within the first 5 years. Patients who are fit for surgery should be informed about the risks and benefits of both options.

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between hearing ability and cognitive domains and determine how the relationship changes after 6 months of introducing a hearing aid.We conducted a 6-month hearing aid lending study between September 2014 and March 2019, including 59 older participants who visited the Memory Clinic at the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology. The hearing level was assessed using pure tone audiometry. Speech intelligibility was measured using the monosyllabic word discrimination score. We assessed the relationship between hearing ability and cognitive domains using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) total score and four subscale scores (orientation, memory, attention, and language). Differences in the cognitive function between baseline (pre-) and 6 months later (post-) after introducing a hearing aid were also assessed.The pre-orientation score was significantly associated with the pure-tone average (p = 0.013), and the pre-language score was significantly associated with speech intelligibility (p = 0.006) after adjusting for confounders. None of the MMSE subscale scores were significantly different between pre- and post-scores, however, an expectation of improvement with continuous hearing aid use was implied in the attention domain.We found a significant association between hearing ability and cognitive domains in individuals whose cognitive functions were not considered healthy. The presence of a potential relationship between cognitive domains, hearing ability, and auditory compensation is suggested.

Three-dimensional positional changes of the temporomandibular joint after mandible reconstruction using microvascular fibula flaps were investigated in 58 patients. The results of preoperative virtually planned surgery, intraoperative resection- and cutting-guided surgery, and non-guided surgery were compared. Pre- and postoperative computed tomography data of each patient were processed and superimposed digitally. The condyle deviations and rotations along the axes and planes of the skull, as well as Euclidean distances, were determined. Reliability analyses, descriptive statistics, and non-parametric tests were performed with the alpha level set at P = 0.05. Reliability proved to be excellent for all variables. The median Euclidean distance was 2.07 mm for the left condyle and 2.11 mm for the right condyle. Deviations of ≥ 10 mm occurred in nine (16%) cases. The maximum deviation occurred in the horizontal plane and the least deviation in the sagittal plane. Median rotation was ≤ 1.4° around all axes. The condylar displacements did not differ significantly between the different surgical techniques investigated. The three-dimensional measurement method applied is highly reliable for evaluating the three-dimensional condylar position after mandibular reconstruction.