Search

BACKGROUND Same-day bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BiTKA) is a controversial topic in orthopedics, prompting a consensus statement to be released by national experts. To date, no studies have evaluated the trends of this method since these recommendations. This study utilized a national database to evaluate: 1) incidence; 2) patient characteristics; 3) hospital characteristics; and 4) inpatient course for same-day BiTKAs in the United States from 2009 to 2016. METHOD The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for individuals undergoing same-day BiTKAs, yielding 245,138 patients. Patient demographics included age, sex, race, obesity status and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. Hospital characteristics consisted of location/teaching status, geographic region, charges, and costs. Inpatient course included length of stay, discharge disposition, and complications. RESULTS Same-day BiTKA incidence decreased from 5.6% to 4.0% over the study (p

Maryland was granted a waiver to implement a Global Budget Revenue (GBR) reimbursement model. Statewide results for combined medical and surgical services have been reported for fiscal years 2015 and 2016. A paucity of studies exists exploring the change in care costs and outcomes for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients under GBR. This study aims to assess the effects of GBR on cost of care and resource utilization related to TKA at a single institution before and after GBR.The Maryland Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was used to find Medicare patients who underwent TKA at a single institution before (2012-2013) and after (2014-2015) GBR. A total of 150 and 161 TKAs were performed in 2012 and 2015. Cost differences were compared for each inpatient care episode, postacute care period, and readmissions. We also evaluated differences in length of stay, discharge disposition, and complication rates.Mean inpatient cost was significantly lower in 2015 vs 2012 (P = .0014); however, analysis of postacute costs showed a nonsignificant increase in price between years (P = .1008). We demonstrated significant increase in home health (P.0001) and significant decrease in acute rehabilitation (P = .0481). Durable medical equipment costs significantly decreased (P = .0087).We demonstrate lower mean inpatient costs since GBR initiation. We reveal increased mean postacute care costs, which may be due to increased acuity for patients needing postacute care. Our results show nonsignificant reductions in length of stay, complications, and increased rate of home discharge, suggesting GBR may be effective in orchestrating reduced costs for TKA at high-volume institutions.

Background Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can often be challenging. The use of a new revision system may aid in providing better stability, improved function, fit, and implant longevity. Therefore, we assessed: (1) survivorship, (2) clinical outcomes, (3) postoperative complications, and (4) radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent revision TKA using this system. Methods Patients from 2 hospitals who underwent revision TKA using a newer generation revision knee system between June 2008 and December 2013 for component instability or aseptic loosening were included. There were 93 patients, who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 41-84 years), and a mean follow-up of 4 years (range, 2-7 years). Survivorship was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Radiographic analysis was performed using the new Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Results Aseptic survivorship was 96% (95% confidence interval, 6.6-7.3), and all-cause survivorship was 94% (95% confidence interval, 6.4-7.2). There were 2 infections and 4 aseptic loosening cases. The mean Knee Society score was 86 points (range, 38-100 points) and the mean functional Knee Society score was 52 points (range, 15-90 points) at final follow-up. The mean postoperative extension and flexion were 2° (range, 0°-20°) and 106° (range, 20°-130°), respectively. There were 3 medical and 11 surgical complications. Excluding the aseptic and septic failures, there were no progressive radiolucencies or osteolysis at final follow-up. Conclusion At up to 7-year follow-up, this new revision system demonstrated excellent survivorship and good functional outcomes. Future studies should be prospective, comparative, and include larger cohorts for further assessment of this device.