1. Data From Web-Based Questionnaires Were Valid for Gestational Diabetes and Preeclampsia, but Not Gestational Hypertension
- Author
-
Joris van Drongelen, Nel Roeleveld, Pim Beekers, Marleen M.H.J. van Gelder, and Hussein Jamaladin
- Subjects
Adult ,Gestational hypertension ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Epidemiology ,Vascular damage Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 16] ,Overweight ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] ,Preeclampsia ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pre-Eclampsia ,Pregnancy ,Risk Factors ,Positive predicative value ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Netherlands ,Internet ,Obstetrics ,business.industry ,Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 10] ,Gestational diabetes ,Diabetes, Gestational ,Parity ,Female ,Self Report ,medicine.symptom ,Complication ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objectives We aimed to validate Web-based questionnaires for the common pregnancy complications gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia. Study Design and Setting We included 1,809 women participating in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study who delivered in 2012–2017, for whom relevant data were complete. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of self-reported diagnoses of gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, and preeclampsia were determined using obstetric records as reference standard. Furthermore, we assessed whether maternal characteristics affected disagreement between questionnaires and obstetric record. Results For gestational diabetes and preeclampsia, we observed very few false-positive and false-negative reports, yielding sensitivities of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86–100) and 88% (95% CI 79–98), respectively, and specificities of 100%. Depending on the definition of gestational hypertension, sensitivity and positive predictive values ranged from 62% to 89% and 53% to 64%, respectively. Disagreement on gestational hypertension was associated with prepregnancy overweight and multiparity. Conclusion Self-reports of gestational diabetes and preeclampsia in Web-based questionnaires were valid, but the validity of gestational hypertension seemed to be lower because of relatively high numbers of false-positive reports. However, it is questionable whether an appropriate reference standard exists to validate this pregnancy complication.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF