Search

Your search keyword '"Mukherjee, N."' showing total 31 results
Start Over Author "Mukherjee, N." Publisher elsevier bv
31 results on '"Mukherjee, N."'

1. Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice

Author

Schaafsma, M, primary, Ahn, S, additional, Castro, AJ, additional, Dendoncker, N, additional, Filyushkina, A, additional, González-Jiménez, D, additional, Huambachano, Mariaelena, additional, Mukherjee, N, additional, Mwampamba, TH, additional, Ngouhouo-Poufoun, J, additional, Palomo, I, additional, Pandit, R, additional, Termansen, M, additional, Ghazi, H, additional, Jacobs, S, additional, Lee, H, additional, and Contreras, V, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. 674 The effective killing of the difficult-to-treat melanomas with the combinations of MCL1 inhibitors S63845/MIK665 plus Navitoclax

Author

Mukherjee, N., primary, Skees, J., additional, Todd, K., additional, West, D., additional, Lambert, K., additional, Robinson, W., additional, Amato, C., additional, Couts, K., additional, Van Gullick, R., additional, MacBeth, M., additional, Nassar, K., additional, Tan, A., additional, Zhai, Z., additional, Fujita, M., additional, Bagby, S., additional, Norris, D., additional, and Shellman, Y., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Policy windows for the environment: Tips for improving the uptake of scientific knowledge

Author

Rose, DC, Mukherjee, N, Simmons, BI, Tew, ER, Robertson, RJ, Vadrot, ABM, Doubleday, R, Sutherland, WJ, Mukherjee, Nibedita [0000-0002-2970-1498], Simmons, Benno [0000-0002-2751-9430], Tew, Eleanor [0000-0002-6600-5598], Doubleday, Robert [0000-0002-1985-9400], Sutherland, William [0000-0002-6498-0437], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
Evidence-based policy, policy windows, evidence-based policy, Horizon scanning, evidence-based conservation, Policy windows, evidence-informed policy, Evidence-based conservation, Evidence-informed policy, horizon scanning, Science-policy interface, science-policy interface
Abstract

© 2017 The Authors. Scientific knowledge is considered to be an important factor (alongside others) in environmental policy-making. However, the opportunity for environmentalists to influence policy can often occur within short, discrete time windows. Therefore, a piece of research may have a negligible or transformative policy influence depending on when it is presented. These ‘policy windows’ are sometimes predictable, such as those dealing with conventions or legislation with a defined renewal period, but are often hard to anticipate. We describe four ways that environmentalists can respond to policy windows and increase the likelihood of knowledge uptake: 1) foresee (and create) emergent windows, 2) respond quickly to opening windows, 3) frame research in line with appropriate windows, and 4) persevere in closed windows. These categories are closely linked; efforts to enhance the incorporation of scientific knowledge into policy need to harness mechanisms within each. We illustrate the main points with reference to nature conservation, but the principles apply widely. European Union Seventh Framework Programme EU Biodiversity Observation Network (No. 308454); Fondation Wiener Anspach, Belgium; Scriven fellowship; Natural Environment Research Council Cambridge Earth System Science NERC DTP [NE/L002507/1]; Natural Environment Research Council Industrial CASE studentship [NE/M010287/1]; Austrian Science Fund (FWF); Arcadia.

Published
2017

14. 524 SASH1 is a novel gene involved in human pigmentation disorders

Author

Almeida, A., primary, Lambert, K., additional, Goldstein, N., additional, Birlea, S., additional, Mukherjee, N., additional, Janssen, K., additional, Backos, D., additional, Koster, M., additional, Norris, D., additional, Artinger, K., additional, Pacheco, T., additional, and Shellman, Y., additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Among Older Live Kidney Donors

Author

Reese, P.P., primary, Bloom, R.D., additional, Feldman, H.I., additional, Rosenbaum, P., additional, Wang, W., additional, Saynisch, P., additional, Tarsi, N.M., additional, Mukherjee, N., additional, Garg, A.X., additional, Mussell, A., additional, Shults, J., additional, Even-Shoshan, O., additional, Townsend, R.R., additional, and Silber, J.H., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Insights from two decades of the Student Conference on Conservation Science

Author

Geldmann, J, Alves-Pinto, H, Amano, T, Bartlett, H, Christie, AP, Collas, L, Cooke, SC, Correa, R, Cripps, I, Doherty, A, Finch, T, Garnett, EE, Hua, F, Jones, JPG, Kasoar, T, MacFarlane, D, Martin, PA, Mukherjee, N, Mumby, HS, Payne, C, Petrovan, SO, Rocha, R, Russell, K, Simmons, BI, Wauchope, HS, Worthington, TA, Trevelyan, R, Green, R, and Balmford, A

Subjects
Cross-disciplinarity, Bias, Early career, New conservation, Capacity building, Field study, 14. Life underwater, Student
Abstract

Conservation science is a crisis-oriented discipline focused on reducing human impacts on nature. To explore how the field has changed over the past two decades, we analyzed 3245 applications for oral presentations submitted to the Student Conference on Conservation Science (SCCS) in Cambridge, UK. SCCS has been running every year since 2000, aims for global representation by providing bursaries to early-career conservationists from lower-income countries, and has never had a thematic focus, beyond conservation in the broadest sense. We found that the majority of projects submitted to SCCS were based on primary biological data collected from local scale field studies in the tropics, contrary to established literature which highlights gaps in tropical research. Our results showed a small increase over time in submissions framed around how nature benefits people as well as a small increase in submissions integrating social science. Our findings suggest that students and early-career conservationists could provide pathways to increase availability of data from the tropics and address well-known biases in the published literature towards wealthier countries. We hope this research will motivate efforts to support student projects, ensuring data and results are published and data made publicly available.

29. Calling for a new agenda for conservation science to create evidence-informed policy

Author

Rose, DC, Amano, T, González-Varo, JP, Mukherjee, N, Robertson, RJ, Simmons, BI, Wauchope, HS, and Sutherland, WJ

Subjects
Evidence-based policy, 13. Climate action, Coproduction, 14. Life underwater, Evidence-informed policy, Science-policy, Science communication
Abstract

Improving the use of scientific evidence in conservation policy has been a long-standing focus of the conservation community. A plethora of studies have examined conservation science-policy interfaces, including a recent global survey of scientists, policy-makers, and practitioners. This identified a list of top barriers and solutions to evidence use, which have considerable overlap with those identified by other studies conducted over the last few decades. The three top barriers – (i) that conservation is not a political priority, (ii) that there is poor engagement between scientists and decision-makers, and (iii) that conservation problems are complex and uncertain – have often been highlighted in the literature as significant constraints on the use of scientific evidence in conservation policy. There is also repeated identification of the solutions to these barriers. In this perspective, we consider three reasons for this: (1) the barriers are insurmountable, (2) the frequently-proposed solutions are poor, (3) there are implementation challenges to putting solutions into practice. We argue that implementation challenges are most likely to be preventing the solutions being put into practice and that the research agenda for conservation science-policy interfaces needs to move away from identifying barriers and solutions, and towards a detailed investigation of how to overcome these implementation challenges.

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results