Search

Purpose To compare the functional outcomes, knee stability, failure rate and complication rates of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction with hamstrings grafts between acute and chronic cases. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent combined ACL and ALL reconstruction with hamstrings grafts were evaluated. Patients operated on less than 8 weeks after injury were allocated to group 1, and the others were allocated to group 2. Demographic data, knee stability, and functional outcomes of the 2 groups were evaluated. Results Thirty-four patients in the acute group and 96 in the chronic group were evaluated. The follow-up time was similar between the groups (28.7 ± 5.2 [24-43] months vs 29.4 ± 7.2 [24-58] months; P = 0.696). No differences were found between the groups in age, sex, trauma mechanism, presence of knee hyperextension, graft diameter, and meniscal injuries. There was no difference between the groups in the postoperative KT-1000 and in the pre- or postoperative pivot shift. The preoperative KT-1000 was higher in group 2 (7.9 ± 1.1 vs 7.4 ± 1.2; P = 0.031). There were no differences in the International Knee Documentation Committee or Lysholm. Three (2.3%) patients developed failure, 1 (2.9%) in group 1 and 2 (2.1%) in group 2. The total complication rate was 10% and did not differ between the groups. Conclusions Combined ACL and ALL reconstruction has similar outcomes in patients undergoing surgery in the acute and chronic phases. Patients with chronic injury have similar knee stability, functional scores, and failure rates as acute-injury patients, and patients with acute injury have no more complications than chronic patients. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

ResumoA luxação crônica da patela é uma patologia rara e o trauma sua principal causa adquirida. Quando negligenciada, leva ao geno valgo progressivo, à torção externa da tíbia e à subsequente artrose debilitante. Não existe consenso na literatura com relação ao tratamento desses pacientes, porém a artroplastia total de joelho (ATJ) tem se mostrado um procedimento eficaz em casos de gonartrose sintomática dolorosa. Poucos relatos mostraram que a via subvasto associada à liberação lateral é uma opção válida para ATJ, já que permite a correção de deformidades em valgo e da boa excursão patelar, sem interrupção do suprimento sanguíneo. Relatamos um caso de uma paciente com geno valgo e luxação crônica pós‐traumática de patela submetida a ATJ associada ao realinhamento do mecanismo extensor, com resultados satisfatórios persistentes após seguimento de dois anos.AbstractChronic lateral dislocation of the patella is a rare condition and acquired causes are usually secondary to knee trauma. The neglected chronic dislocation leads to progressive genu valgum and external tibial torsion deformities with subsequent gonarthrosis, which becomes painful and debilitating. There is no consensus regarding treatment of these patients, but total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a useful therapy in cases of painful symptomatic gonarthrosis. Few reports have shown that subvastus approach and lateral release may be a valid option for TKA, since it allows the correction of valgus deformity and patellar tracking without interrupting vascular blood supply of patella. This article reports a case of TKA and extensor mechanism realignment without patellar resurfacing in a patient with genu valgum and chronic post‐traumatic patellar dislocation with satisfactory results after two years of follow‐up.

The aim of this study was to describe the experience and the profile of users of an outpatient clinic of Mindfulness and health promotion from a public University in Brazil. The profile of the participants was obtained from the application of different psychometric scales (BDI, SUBI, MAAS and EUROQOL 5 D), as well as socio‐demographic and health information. The description of the experience of the clinic was held from the SWOT technique. In this sample, the profile found was predominantly female, with health insurance and medical care. Despite the problems reported, the subjective perception of quality of life was above average. Belong to a public University, rely on multidisciplinary team and facilitators of different configurations in mindfulness, plus easily accessible location are strengths of this clinic, as well as the high prevalence of anxiety and depression, which can enhance the expansion of this activity.

We present a new technique for the combined intra- and extra-articular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Intra-articular reconstruction is performed in an outside-in manner according to the precepts of the anatomic femoral tunnel technique. Extra-articular reconstruction is performed with the gracilis tendon while respecting the anatomic parameters of the origin and insertion points and the path described for the knee anterolateral ligament.

ResumoObjetivoAvaliar a presença do ligamento anterolateral (LAL) do joelho em exames de ressonância magnética (RM).MétodosForam avaliadas 33 RM de joelho de pacientes feitas por indicações não relacionadas a instabilidade ligamentar ou trauma. Foram obtidas imagens no plano sagital ponderadas em T1 e imagens nos planos axial, sagital e coronal ponderadas em T2 com saturação de gordura. As imagens foram avaliadas por dois radiologistas experientes em patologias musculoesqueléticas. Na avaliação da visualização, dividimos a análise do ligamento em três porções: origem femoral até o seu ponto de bifurcação, da bifurcação até a inserção meniscal e da bifurcação até a inserção tibial. Considerou‐se com variável categórica dicotômica (sim ou não) a capacidade de visualizar o ligamento em cada uma das porções e no seu todo.ResultadosO LAL foi visualizado com característica de sinal semelhante às demais estruturas ligamentares do joelho, com hipossinal em T2 com saturação de gordura. O principal plano em que o ligamento foi identificado foi o coronal. Alguma porção do ligamento foi visualizada com clareza em 27 (81,8%) joelhos. A porção meniscal ficou evidente em 25 (75,7%) dos joelhos, a porção femoral em 23 (69,6%) e a tibial em 13 (39,3%). As três porções foram visualizadas em conjunto em 11 (33,3%) joelhos.ConclusãoO ligamento anterolateral do joelho é mais bem visualizado em sequências no plano coronal. O ligamento foi caracterizado por completo em 33,3% dos casos. A porção meniscal foi a mais facilmente identificada e a tibial a menos encontrada.AbstractObjectiveTo evaluated the presence of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations.MethodsThirty‐three MRI examinations on patients’ knees that were done because of indications unrelated to ligament instability or trauma were evaluated. T1‐weighted images in the sagittal plane and T2‐weighted images with fat saturation in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes were obtained. The images were evaluated by two radiologists with experience of musculoskeletal pathological conditions. In assessing ligament visibility, we divided the analysis into three portions of the ligament: from its origin in the femur to its point of bifurcation; from the bifurcation to the meniscal insertion; and from the bifurcation to the tibial insertion. The capacity to view the ligament in each of its portions and overall was taken to be a dichotomous categorical variable (yes or no).ResultsThe ALL was viewed with signal characteristics similar to those of the other ligament structures of the knee, with T2 hyposignal with fat saturation. The main plane in which the ligament was viewed was the coronal plane. Some portion of the ligament was viewed clearly in 27 knees (81.8%). The meniscal portion was evident in 25 knees (75.7%), the femoral portion in 23 (69.6%) and the tibial portion in 13 (39.3%). The three portions were viewed together in 11 knees (33.3%).ConclusionThe anterolateral ligament of the knee is best viewed in sequences in the coronal plane. The ligament was completely characterized in 33.3% of the cases. The meniscal portion was the part most easily identified and the tibial portion was the part least encountered.

Combined injuries involving the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterolateral corner (PLC) occur in approximately 10% of complex knee injuries. The current tendency is to reconstruct both the ACL and the structures of the PLC. In injuries involving multiple ligaments, a potential problem in the reconstruction is the convergence of tunnels in the lateral walls of the femur. As a solution to this problem, we propose a combined technique for reconstruction of the ACL and PLC with a single tunnel in the lateral femoral wall. Combined ACL/PLC reconstruction is performed with 2 semitendinosus tendons and 1 gracilis tendon. The technique consists of making a tunnel in the lateral wall of the femur, from the outside in, at the isometric point, for reconstruction of the collateral ligament and popliteus tendon, and emerging in the joint region at the anatomic point of the ACL reconstruction. The graft is passed from the tibia to the femur with the double gracilis tendon and the simple semitendinosus tendon; the remaining portions are left for reconstruction of the structures of the PLC. This technique is very effective in terms of minimizing the number of tunnels, but it does rely on having grafts of adequate size.

We read with great interest the article by Young et al. [1] entitled “Management of the exposed total knee prosthesis, a six-year review” regarding the outcomes of complex infection cases after total knee arthroplasty. We agree with the authors in relation to the fact that it is very difficult to treat these types of patients. We performed a similar case series [2] a few years ago and found a rate of amputation of 44.4%, higher than the rate found by Young et al. and by other small case series published [1,3–5]. All of our patients were infected by multi-resistant bacteria and had comorbidities with rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed in 66.6%. In this scenario, we feel that the treatment success is not only based on the institution protocol but also on the initial patient condition and on the bacteria causing the infection. Regarding patients that undergo amputation following infection, another study performed in our institution showed that only one patient was able to walk after this procedure, a result much worse than the patients that retained a spacer [6]. We feel that patients that proceed to amputation following a knee infection are very weakened and have been through a significant number of surgical procedures, making it difficult for them to return to regular activities.

Introduction Knee dislocations are defined as ligament injuries involving at least two of the four most important knee ligaments. Results from recent studies have shown a tendency towards improvement of the functional outcomes with use of an articulated external fixator during the postoperative period following multiligament reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that good knee stability and early gain of range of motion could be achieved with the use of the external fixator after ligament reconstructions. Methods Fourteen patients with knee dislocations were evaluated after multiligament reconstruction in association with use of a lateral monoplanar external fixator for six weeks. Reconstructions were performed using grafts from a tissue bank. Range of motion was measured after one, two, three, six, twelve months and at the final evaluation at a mean time of 49 months. The assessments were made using objective and subjective IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner scales. Results The mean scores were 71.7 for the subjective IKDC score, 81.5 for the Lysholm score. No patient was able to return to previous Tegner score. Out of the 45 ligament reconstructions performed, only four failed during the follow-up time. The mean range of motion of the knee presented a progressive increase from the first to the twelfth month, from 67.8° to 115.7°. Two cases of superficial infection on the site of the external fixator pins were observed. Conclusion The use of an external fixator enabled early rehabilitation with range-of-motion gains starting from the first postoperative month, a low rate of reconstruction failure and minimal complications. Nevertheless, none of the patients returned to the level of activity prevailing prior to the injury. Level of evidence Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.