Search

We sought to provide a meta-analysis and credibility assessment of available randomized controlled trials and propensity score matched studies when assessing early and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared with open distal pancreatectomy.The MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for pertinent literature up to June 2022. Random-effect meta-analyses were applied. Trial sequential analysis was applied to verify whether results were true- or false-positive or -negative findings.Thirteen studies were identified (2 randomized controlled trials and 11 propensity score matched studies). The early outcomes were assessed on 12 studies, including 4,346 patients. In this population, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy decreased postoperative stay (mean difference = 1.8 days; P = .001) and estimated blood loss (mean difference = 148 mL; P = .001), and trial sequential analysis confirmed these as true-positive findings. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy had similar operating times (P = .165), and trial sequential analysis confirmed this as a true-negative finding. Major morbidity, mortality, and readmission were similar, but results were inconclusive by trial sequential analysis. Oncologic outcomes were assessed on 5 studies, including 2,430 patients. In this population, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy showed higher R0 resection rate (OR = 1.46; P = .001) and shorter time to adjuvant therapy (mean difference 4.0 days P = .003). A survival benefit was observed at 1 year after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (OR = 1.45; P = .001), which was not confirmed at 3 years (P = .650).Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is superior to open distal pancreatectomy for most of the early outcomes analyzed. The operating time was equalized as a result of the learning curve. Results from patients with pancreatic cancer suggest at least an oncologic noninferiority of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy compared with open distal pancreatectomy.

Background Radical resection of advanced pancreatic cancer may occasionally require a simultaneous colon resection. The risks and benefits of this combined procedure are largely unknown. This systematic review aimed to assess short and long term outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy with colon resection (PD-colon) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1994 and 2017 concerning PD-colon for PDAC. Results After screening 2038 articles, 5 articles with a total of 181 patients undergoing PD-colon were eligible for inclusion. Included studies showed a relatively low risk of bias. The pooled complication rate was 73% (95% CI 61–84) including a pooled colonic anastomotic leak rate of 5.5%. Pooled mortality was 10% (95% CI 6–15). Pooled mean survival (data from 86 patients) was 18 months (95% CI 13–23) with pooled 3- and 5-year survival of 31% (95% CI 20–72) and 19% (95% CI 6–38). Conclusion Based on the available data, PD-colon for PDAC seems to be associated with an increased morbidity and mortality but with survival comparable with standard PD in selected patients. Future large series are needed to allow for better patient selection for PD-colon.

Background This study aims to analyze clinical characteristics and demographics of all patients admitted for cholecystectomy in a tertiary referral center to determine predictors of incidental gallbladder dysplasia (IGBD) and incidental gallbladder carcinoma (IGBC). Methods A retrospective analyses of clinical, demographic, and histologic features of patients undergoing cholecystectomy in a single tertiary institution from 2005–2012 were performed using a logistic regression model to determine the predictors of IGBD and IGBC. Results Some 771 (28 conversions to open surgery [3.6%]) and 93 patients (10.7%) underwent laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies for gallstone disease, respectively. At final pathology, IGBD (low-grade [ n = 10], high-grade [ n = 2], mixed-grade [ n = 1], and adenoma-associated [ n = 5] dysplasia) was found in 18 patients (2%; median age, 45 y; interquartile range, 42.5–63.5; male-to-female ratio, 1:2; six Caucasian; and 12 Asian). IGBC was found in seven patients (0.8%; median age, 69 y; interquartile range, 69–72; one Afro-Caribbean; four Caucasian; and two Asian). Logistic regression analysis revealed Asian patients to be at a higher risk of IGBD (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–8.0; P = 0.02). Only age (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04–1.2; P P = 0.01) were significantly associated with IGBC. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that age >68 y correlated positively to IGBC. Conclusions IGBD and IGBC are fairly common incidental histologic finding after cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. When considering cholecystectomy, patients' demographics, in particular age and race, should always be considered as this might help the surgeon and the pathologist to institute the appropriate treatment.

We aimed to evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications after total gastrectomy with "over-D1" lymphadenectomy.Data on 161 patients (54 cases aged75 years: elderly group) operated on between 2005 and 2011 were reviewed. Risk factors analyzed for complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) included sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, body mass index (BMI), pTNM stage, long-term antiplatelets therapy, operative time, and splenectomy.The median age of the study population was 71 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-77) years (79 [range 76-90] years for elderly patients vs 65 [range 33-75] years for the control group, P.0001). ASA classification was the only baseline characteristic significantly different in the intergroup analysis; 79.6% of the elderly patients were in ASA class III to IV versus 39.2% of the controls (P.0001). Univariate analysis showed that patient age, ASA score, BMI, and splenectomy were predictive of postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis confirmed ASA score and splenectomy as independent risk-factors.Regardless of age, fit elderly patients with operable gastric cancer should be candidates for the recommended standard extensive surgical resection provided that pre-existing comorbidities are considered.

Gallbladder cancer (GC) is a relatively rare but highly lethal neoplasm. We review the epidemiology, etiology, pathology, symptoms, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis of GC.A Pubmed database search between 1971 and February 2007 was performed. All abstracts were reviewed and articles with GC obtained; further references were extracted by hand-searching the bibliography. The database search was done in the English language.The accurate etiology of GC remains unclear, while the symptoms associated with primary GC are not specific. Treatment with radical cholecystectomy is curative but possible in only 10% to 30% of patients. For patients whose cancer is an incidental finding on pathologic review, re-resection is indicated, where feasible, for all disease except T1a. Patients with advanced disease should receive palliative treatment. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is contraindicated in the presence of GC.Prognosis generally is extremely poor. Improvements in the outcome of surgical resection have caused this approach to be re-evaluated, while the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy remains controversial.

a case of human pulmonary dirofilariasis