Search

The 2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group was coordinated and supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health. It is designed to improve patient care and support informed decision making about asthma management in the clinical setting. This update addresses six priority topic areas as determined by the state of the science at the time of a needs assessment, and input from multiple stakeholders:A rigorous process was undertaken to develop these evidence-based guidelines. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Evidence-Based Practice Centers conducted systematic reviews on these topics, which were used by the Expert Panel Working Group as a basis for developing recommendations and guidance. The Expert Panel used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), an internationally accepted framework, in consultation with an experienced methodology team for determining the certainty of evidence and the direction and strength of recommendations based on the evidence. Practical implementation guidance for each recommendation incorporates findings from NHLBI-led patient, caregiver, and clinician focus groups. To assist clincians in implementing these recommendations into patient care, the new recommendations have been integrated into the existing Expert Panel Report-3 (EPR-3) asthma management step diagram format.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers that can predict loss of asthma control among patients being considered for step-down therapy in well-controlled disease are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether baseline biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation and/or serial measurement of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (Feno) predict loss of asthma control as therapy is stepped down. METHODS: In subanalyses of a multicenter randomized, double-blind, parallel 3-arm trial comparing strategies for step-down therapy in well-controlled asthma (Long-Acting Beta-Agonist Step-Down Study), we assessed whether baseline atopy as determined by serum aeroallergen allergy screening test (Phadiatop), baseline serum eosinophil peroxidase, or baseline or serial Feno measurements during follow-up predicted the time to loss of asthma control among participants. Loss of asthma control was defined in the study protocol. We analyzed these associations in adjusted models including all participants, after testing for interactions with assignment to each of the 3 treatment groups (continuation of stable dose of combination inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting beta-agonist, step-down of inhaled corticosteroid, or discontinuation of long-acting bronchodilator). RESULTS: Four hundred forty-seven of the 553 Long-Acting Beta-Agonist Step-Down Study participants who were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms and had at least 1 biomarker measurement were included in this analysis. At baseline, higher levels of Feno were significantly associated with greater levels of multiallergen IgE levels (P < .001), but not with serum eosinophil peroxidase (P = .742). Among all participants as a group, elevations in baseline biomarkers were not predictive of a higher risk of treatment failure. In addition, Feno levels measured serially at 6-week intervals demonstrated that compared with participants with low levels (50 parts per billion) levels did not have significantly increased likelihood of subsequent treatment failure (hazard ratios, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.59–1.78] and 1.29 [95% CI, 0.65–2.54], respectively). There were no significant interactions of treatment group and baseline biomarkers. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with well-controlled asthma, neither baseline levels of type 2 airway inflammatory biomarkers nor serial measures of Feno are strong predictors of treatment failure.

Purpose: A number of institutions have clinically implemented CYP2D6 genotyping to guide drug prescribing. We compared implementation strategies of early adopters of CYP2D6 testing, barriers faced by both early adopters and institutions in the process of implementing CYP2D6 testing, and approaches taken to overcome these barriers. Methods: We surveyed eight early adopters of CYP2D6 genotyping and eight institutions in the process of adoption. Data were collected on testing approaches, return of results procedures, applications of genotype results, challenges faced, and lessons learned. Results: Among early adopters, CYP2D6 testing was most commonly ordered to assist with opioid and antidepressant prescribing. Key differences among programs included test ordering and genotyping approaches, result reporting, and clinical decision support. However, all sites tested for copy number variation and 9 common variants, and reported results in the medical record. Most sites provided automatic consultation and had designated personnel to assist with genotype-informed therapy recommendations. Primary challenges were related to stakeholder support, CYP2D6 gene complexity, phenotype assignment, and sustainability. Conclusion: There are specific challenges unique to CYP2D6 testing given the complexity of the gene and its relevance to multiple medications. Consensus lessons learned may guide those interested in pursuing similar clinical pharmacogenetic programs.

Precision medicine is expected to impact the care of people with asthma, given its high disease prevalence, heterogeneity of pathophysiologic mechanisms, and consequent clinical phenotypes. A novel phenotype-stratified clinical trial conducted by the NHLBI AsthmaNet Consortium, titled Steroids in Eosinophil Negative Asthma (SIENA), was a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial that prospectively stratified individuals according to their baseline level of sputum inflammation during a screening period. Two phenotypic strata were assigned based on an a priori defined extent of sputum eosinophilia (Eos Low versus Eos High). This article describes: the scientific premise for the trial design, including assumptions used for power calculations; modifications to the analysis plan implemented after the trial started due to a higher than expected prevalence of one phenotypic stratum which impacted the ability to accrue sufficient subjects within the planned budget and study period; investigator alternatives to address the strata imbalance weighing scientific impact and study feasibility; and the final modified SIENA study design and analysis plan. SIENA was successfully completed in a manner that maintained meaningful outcomes. We conclude with recommendations for incorporation of pre-specified contingency plans into phenotype-directed protocols, to address the potential for differences in observed compared to estimated prevalence of different phenotypes in a study population. These approaches can be applied to precision medicine trials for the future.

Display Omitted Use of cognitive learning theory in informed consent documents is uncommon.A multidisciplinary team was assembled to develop a video consent website.Cognitive learning theory was intentionally applied to the video consent website.Examples of the applied learning principles to enhance comprehension are presented. ObjectivePoor participant comprehension of research procedures following the conventional face-to-face consent process for biomedical research is common. We describe the development of a multimedia informed consent video and website that incorporates cognitive strategies to enhance comprehension of study related material directed to parents and adolescents. Materials and methodsA multidisciplinary team was assembled for development of the video and website that included human subjects professionals; psychologist researchers; institutional video and web developers; bioinformaticians and programmers; and parent and adolescent stakeholders. Five learning strategies that included Sensory-Modality view, Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, and Personalization were integrated into a 15-min video and website material that describes a clinical research trial. ResultsA diverse team collaborated extensively over 15months to design and build a multimedia platform for obtaining parental permission and adolescent assent for participant in as asthma clinical trial. Examples of the learning principles included, having a narrator describe what was being viewed on the video (sensory-modality); eliminating unnecessary text and graphics (coherence); having the initial portion of the video explain the sections of the video to be viewed (signaling); avoiding simultaneous presentation of text and graphics (redundancy); and having a consistent narrator throughout the video (personalization). DiscussionExisting conventional and multimedia processes for obtaining research informed consent have not actively incorporated basic principles of human cognition and learning in the design and implementation of these processes. The present paper illustrates how this can be achieved, setting the stage for rigorous evaluation of potential benefits such as improved comprehension, satisfaction with the consent process, and completion of research objectives. ConclusionNew consent strategies that have an integrated cognitive approach need to be developed and tested in controlled trials.

Background Pediatric asthma exacerbations are a frequent reason for emergency care. Early administration of oral systemic corticosteroids (OCS) in the emergency department (ED) decreases hospitalization rates and ED length-of-stay (LOS). However, it is unknown whether even earlier OCS administration by emergency medical services (EMS) in the prehospital setting further improves outcomes. Purpose To describe the background and methods of a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of EMS-administered OCS for pediatric asthma patients incorporating a stepped wedge design and the RE-AIM framework. Methods The study employs a non-randomized stepped wedge design where multiple EMS agencies adopt OCS as a treatment for pediatric asthma exacerbations at varying times. This design accommodates ethical considerations of studying pediatric subjects in the prehospital setting where informed consent is not feasible. We will compare hospitalization rates, ED LOS, and short-term healthcare costs between pediatric asthma patients who do and do not receive OCS from EMS. Using geographic information systems (GIS), we will measure how differences in outcomes scale with increasing EMS transport time. We will use the RE-AIM framework to guide a mixed methods analysis of barriers and enablers to EMS administration of OCS for pediatric asthma patients, including quantitative measures of adoption and uptake and qualitative EMS provider focus group data. Conclusion This trial will determine if earlier EMS administration of OCS to pediatric asthma patients decreases hospitalizations, ED LOS, and short-term healthcare costs, and if those outcomes scale with longer EMS transport times. We will identify barriers and enablers to implementing EMS-administered OCS for pediatric asthma patients.

Introduction Phase III/IV clinical trials are expensive and time consuming and often suffer from poor enrollment and retention rates. Pediatric trials are particularly difficult because scheduling around the parent, participant and potentially other sibling schedules can be burdensome. We are evaluating using the internet and mobile devices to conduct the consent process and study visits in a streamlined pediatric asthma trial. Our hypothesis is that these study processes will be non-inferior and will be less expensive compared to a traditional pediatric asthma trial. Materials/methods Parents and participants, aged 12 through 17 years, complete the informed consent process by viewing a multi-media website containing a consent video and study material in the streamlined trial. Participants are provided an iPad with WiFi and EasyOne spirometer for use during FaceTime visits and online twice daily symptom reporting during an 8-week run-in followed by a 12-week study period. Outcomes are compared with participants completing a similarly designed traditional trial comparing the same treatments within the same pediatric health-system. After 8 weeks of open-label Advair 250/50 twice daily, participants in both trial types are randomized to Advair 250/50, Flovent 250, or Advair 100/50 given 1 inhalation twice daily. Study staff track time spent to determine study costs. Results Participants have been enrolled in the streamlined and traditional trials and recruitment is ongoing. Conclusions This project will provide important information on both clinical and economic outcomes for a novel method of conducting clinical trials. The results will be broadly applicable to trials of other diseases.

While there is growing scientific evidence for and significant advances in the use of genomic technologies in medicine, there is a significant lag in the clinical adoption and sustainability of genomic medicine. Here we describe the findings from the National Human Genome Research Institute's (NHGRI) Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) Network in identifying key constructs, opportunities, and challenges associated with driving sustainability of genomic medicine in clinical practice.Network members and affiliates were surveyed to identify key drivers associated with implementing and sustaining a genomic medicine program. Tallied results were used to develop and weigh key constructs/drivers required to support sustainability of genomic medicine programs.The top three driver-stakeholder dyads were (1) genomic training for providers, (2) genomic clinical decision support (CDS) tools embedded in the electronic health record (EHR), and (3) third party reimbursement for genomic testing.Priorities may differ depending on healthcare systems when comparing the current state of key drivers versus projected needs for supporting genomic medicine sustainability. Thus we provide gap-filling guidance based on IGNITE members' experiences. Although results are limited to findings from the IGNITE network, their implementation, scientific, and clinical experience may be used as a road map by others considering implementing genomic medicine programs.

Uncontrolled asthma is a major cause of hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Factors including obesity, African ancestry and childhood are associated with increased asthma severity. Considering the high morbidity caused by asthma, relatively few classes of drugs exist to control this common disease. Therefore, new therapeutic strategies may be needed to reduce asthma's impact on public health. Data suggest that a high fat diet that is deficient in omega-3 fatty acids could promote both obesity and excessive inflammation, resulting in greater asthma severity. Small trials with supplemental omega-3 fatty acids have been conducted with encouraging but inconsistent results. The variability in response seen in past trials may be due to the past subjects' genetics (specifically ALOX5 rs59439148) or their particular asthma phenotypes. Therefore, the "Nutrigenetic response to Omega-3 Fatty acids in Obese Asthmatics (NOOA)" trial is currently underway and was designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled intervention study to determine if supplemental omega-3 fatty acids improves symptoms among obese adolescents and young adults with uncontrolled asthma. Here we report the design and rationale for the NOOA trial. Participants were given either 3.18 g daily of eicosapentaenoic acid and 822 mg daily docosahexaenoic acid, or matched control soy oil, for 24 weeks. Change in the asthma control questionnaire score was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included spirometry, impulse oscillometry, exacerbation rate, airway biomarkers, systemic inflammation, leukotriene biosynthesis and T-lymphocyte function. NOOA may lead to a new therapeutic treatment strategy and greater understanding of the mechanistic role of diet in the pathogenesis of asthma.

Background Stepping down therapy when asthma is well controlled on combination inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) is recommended, but it is not known whether lowering the ICS dose or stopping LABA is superior. Objective To evaluate whether step-down therapy with LABA is superior to one without; and, secondarily, to evaluate whether reducing the ICS dose while maintaining LABA is noninferior to remaining on stable-ICS/LABA. Methods The study was a randomized, double-masked 3-arm parallel group trial in participants aged 12 years or older. Following an 8-week run-in, 459 participants were randomly assigned to continue medium-dose ICS/LABA, reduced-dose ICS/LABA, or ICS alone (LABA-step-off) and followed for 48 weeks. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure, a composite of health care utilization, systemic corticosteroid use, increase in rescue therapy, decline in lung function, or participant or physician decision. Results Time to treatment failure did not differ significantly between reduced- ICS/LABA and LABA-step-off (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95.3% CI, 0.69-1.65, P = .76). Nor was there a difference between stable-ICS/LABA and reduced-ICS/LABA (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.70-1.76; P = .67), but the 10% noninferiority margin was exceeded. Lung function declines and hospitalization rates were significantly greater in the LABA-step-off group. Conclusions The 2 step-down regimens did not differ in terms of treatment failure, although stopping LABA was associated with a decline in lung function and more hospitalizations. There was no evidence to support the noninferiority of reduced-ICS/LABA as compared with stable-ICS/LABA.

Exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) is a common problem in children with asthma. Pretreatment with the beta2 (beta 2)-adrenoreceptor agonist albuterol is effective for preventing EIB, but is recognized as providing only short-term (2 to 3 hour) protection.To evaluate the 12-hour efficacy and safety of single doses of 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms of salmeterol powder administered via Diskus inhaler versus albuterol aerosol via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and placebo in preventing EIB in asthmatic children.A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, single-dose, four-way crossover study was conducted in pediatric patients (4 to 11 years of age) demonstrating EIB and mild-to-moderate asthma. Serial forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured before and after standard treadmill exercise at hour 1, hour 6, and hour 12 after administration of 25 micrograms or 50 micrograms salmeterol powder, 180 micrograms albuterol aerosol, or placebo. Adverse events were recorded.After completion of the hour 1 exercise challenge, mean minimum % predicted FEV1 was significantly higher following albuterol (91.3%) than for placebo (75.3%) and for both dosages of salmeterol (86.9% and 85.8% for salmeterol 25 micrograms and 50 micrograms, respectively; Por = .026). After completion of both the hour 6 and hour 12 exercise challenges, the 50-microgram salmeterol treatment produced a significantly higher mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 (90.6% and 87.3% predicted, respectively) than the mean minimum percent of predicted FEV1 for placebo or albuterol (73.8% to 78.4% of predicted; Por = .041). At hour 6, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment was not significantly different from albuterol or placebo. At hour 12, the 25-microgram salmeterol treatment mean minimum percent of predicted was significantly higher than albuterol (87.9% versus 73.8% of predicted; P = .006) and there was also a trend toward significance over placebo (76.9% predicted; P = .056). At all exercise periods, no statistically significant differences in spirometry values were observed between the two salmeterol treatment groups. Safety profiles were similar among treatments, including placebo. No drug-related adverse events or withdrawals due to adverse events occurred. Changes in laboratory values, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, and physical examinations were unremarkable.A single 50-microgram dose of salmeterol powder provided effective and safe protection against EIB for at least 12 hours in asthmatic children and provided a significantly more prolonged effect than albuterol aerosol (180 micrograms).

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the protection afforded by individualized doses of theophylline and a cromolyn metered-dose inhaler (MDI) during allergen challenge. Methods: The study design was randomized, double-blind, and crossover. Responses to inhaled allergen were measured in 16 subjects with allergic asthma (age range, 18 to 35 years) after 7 days of treatment with either placebo, once daily slow-release theophylline producing a mean ± SD serum concentration of 16 ± 5 μg/ml during the late phase, or 2 mg of cromolyn administered by MDI four times daily. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second was measured at frequent intervals, and airway responsiveness to histamine was measured before and 3 hours after allergen challenge. Results: The mean ± SD maximum decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second during the late phase was 30% ± 14% during placebo treatment, 16% ± 13% during theophylline treatment, and 13% ± 14% during cromolyn treatment (placebo vs theophylline and cromolyn, p = 0.0001; theophylline vs cromolyn, p = 0.1). The geometric mean fold increase in airway responsiveness was 3.0 ± 1.7 during placebo treatment, 1.7 ± 1.7 during theophylline treatment, and 1.5 ± 1.6 during cromolyn treatment (placebo vs theophylline and cromolyn, p = 0.0001; theophylline vs cromolyn, p = 0.1). Conclusions: Theophylline, when administered once daily as a slow-release formulation, was as effective as cromolyn, administered four times daily through an MDI, in attenuating airway responses to inhaled allergen. The protection afforded by both treatments, however, was modest when compared with the results of similar studies with inhaled corticosteroids or other cromolyn formulations that deliver more drug to the lungs than the MDI available in the United States.

Objective: To determine whether a generic slow-release theophylline tablet (manufactured by Sidmak Laboratories, Inc.) is therapeutically equivalent to a proprietary theophylline tablet, Theo-Dur, in children. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Setting: Multicenter clinics. Patients: 38 children, 6 to 16 years of age, with asthma. Interventions: Individualized doses of Theo-Dur or generic tablet every 12 hours for 5 days. Measurements and main results: During the last 24 hours of each regimen, theophylline serum concentrations were measured serially and a standardized exercise stress test was performed at 24 hours (trough serum concentration). Neither formulation effectively blocked the response to exercise; the maximum decrease in forced expiratory volume in the first second was 26.1% ± 18.9% with Theo-Dur and 24.8% ± 19.7% with the generic product (p = 0.68; β = 0.08). The mean ± SD peak serum concentrations were 18.0 ± 3.0 μg/ml with Theo-Dur and 18.7 ± 3.7 μg/ml with the generic tablet; the trough serum concentration was

The results of previous studies comparing bronchodilatation from beta agonists administered by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and nebulizer solution have been conflicting. We therefore evaluated a range of albuterol doses administered by these two methods, using histamine bronchoprovocation as a bioassay for the amount of drug reaching the β 2 receptors in the lung. Twelve stable asthmatic volunteers received, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design on different days, placebo or one, two, four, or six puffs from an MDI attached to an InspirEase device (90 µg per puff) or 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, or 5.0 mg of solution delivered in 2 ml of buffered saline through a Hudson Updraft II nebulizer. The histamine concentration required to decrease FEV 1 by 20 percent (PC 20 ) was measured 1 h before and 30 min after administration of each treatment and expressed as the increase in PC 20 from baseline. The dose-response curves for change in PC 20 indicated that the higher doses of the nebulizer solution delivered more drug to β 2 receptors in the lung than the lower doses from the MDI. For example, the geometric mean increase in PC 20 was 1.1 ± 1.6 (SD) after placebo, 7.5 ± 2.7 after two puffs from the MDI, and 20.0 ± 2.1 after 2.5 mg of nebulizer solution (p 2 receptors in the lungs and, thus, the clinical response.

Rationale To examine the safety of budesonide inhalation suspension (BIS) in infants. Methods A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in infants aged 6-12 months with mild to moderate asthma or recurrent wheeze who were randomized to once-daily BIS 0.5 or 1.0 mg, or placebo. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs), changes from baseline in vital signs, physical examinations, oropharyngeal and nasal fungal cultures, and laboratory results. Analysis included all patients who received ≥1 dose and had ≥1 observation (n=141). Results The majority of AEs were mild to moderate; 43 (97.7%), 43 (89.6%), and 43 (87.8%) patients receiving BIS 1 mg, 0.5 mg, and placebo had ≥1 AE, respectively. Five patients receiving BIS experienced serious AEs (2 aggravated asthma, 1 pneumonia, 1 respiratory and 1 viral infection) that were considered unrelated to treatment; 2 of these patients discontinued early. One patient receiving BIS 0.5 mg also discontinued prematurely because of a facial/neck rash. No serious AEs were reported for placebo. Changes in vital signs and laboratory results were comparable among groups. Although difficult to assess over a 12-week period, body length increased in all groups, with mean values of 3.1, 3.5, and 3.7 cm in the infants receiving BIS 1.0 mg, BIS 0.5 mg, and placebo, respectively ( P >0.5). No significant differences between groups in baseline-adjusted oropharyngeal or nasal fungal cultures occurred. Conclusions Consistent with long-term safety of BIS in older pediatric patients, once-daily BIS in infants aged 6 to 12 months was well tolerated and comparable with placebo.