Search

Doravirine is a novel, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that has shown non-inferior efficacy to ritonavir-boosted darunavir, with a superior lipid profile, in adults with HIV who were treatment naive at week 48 in the phase 3 DRIVE-FORWARD trial. Here we present the 96-week data for the study.This randomised, controlled, double-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study was undertaken at 125 clinical centres in 15 countries. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) infected with HIV-1 who were naive to antiretroviral therapy, with a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of 1000 copies per mL or higher at screening, and no known resistance to any of the study drugs. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice and web response system, stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA concentration and background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy, to doravirine (100 mg per day) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (100 mg ritonavir and 800 mg darunavir per day), both with investigator-selected nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or abacavir and lamivudine. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment assignment until week 96. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants who had a plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, which has been reported previously. Here we report the key secondary efficacy endpoint of the proportion of participants who achieved this concentration by week 96, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study drug, regardless of whether it was their randomly assigned treatment. We used a US Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach and a margin of 10 percentage points to define the non-inferiority of doravirine to ritonavir-boosted darunavir at 96 weeks. Key safety endpoints were change in fasting serum lipid concentrations, the incidence of adverse events, and time to discontinuation due to an adverse event, assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02275780, and is closed to accrual.Between Dec 1, 2014, and Oct 20, 2015, 1027 individuals were screened, of whom 769 participants were randomly assigned to doravirine (n=385) or ritonavir-boosted darunavir (n=384), and 383 in both groups were given at least one dose of their allocated treatment. Most participants were male (645 [84%] of 766) and white (560 [73%]), with a mean age of 35·2 years (SD 10·6). 292 participants in the doravirine group and 273 in the darunavir group completed 96 weeks of treatment. At week 96, a higher proportion of the doravirine group (277 [73%] of 383) achieved an HIV-1 RNA concentration of less than 50 copies per mL than did of the darunavir group (248 [66%] of 383; difference 7·1%, 95% CI 0·5-13·7). Responses were similar regardless of baseline characteristics. Treatment-emergent resistance to any study drug occurred in two (1%) of 383 participants in the doravirine group and one (1%) of 383 in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group. Significant differences were seen between treatment groups in mean changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol (-14·6 mg/dL, 95% CI -18·2 to -11·0) and non-HDL cholesterol (-18·4 mg/dL, -22·5 to -14·3). Frequencies of adverse events were similar between groups. No significant treatment difference (log-rank nominal p=0·063) through week 96 was observed in time to discontinuation due to an adverse event. The most common adverse events (week 0-96) were diarrhoea (65 [17%] in the doravirine group vs 91 [24%] in the ritonavir-boosted darunavir group), nausea (45 [12%] vs 52 [14%]), headache (57 [15%] vs 46 [12%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (51 [13%] vs 30 [8%]). Two participants, one in each group, died during treatment; neither death was considered to be related to study medication.These results through 96 weeks support the efficacy and safety results reported previously for doravirine at 48 weeks, supporting the use of doravirine for the long-term treatment of adults with previously untreated HIV-1 infection.Merck.

The Gender, Race, and Clinical Experience (GRACE) study was designed to assess sex-based differences in darunavir/ ritonavir-based therapy and to enroll a female population representative of the racial demographics of women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS in the United States. Here, we report week 48 results, stratified by race. GRACE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 3b study. Patients received 600 mg of darunavir and 100 mg of ritonavir twice daily plus an investigator-selected optimized background regimen. Virologic response (HIV-1 RNA50 copies/ mL) and safety were assessed over 48 weeks. Post hoc multivariate analyses were performed to investigate factors associated with response. Of 429 patients enrolled, 61.5% were black, 22.4% were Hispanic, and 15.2% were white. Black patients had more advanced disease at baseline, and more black patients discontinued (32.6%) than Hispanic (24%) or white (26.2%) patients. In the intent-to-treat population, similar response rates were seen in Hispanic (61.5%) and white patients (60.0%); lower response rates were observed in black patients (48.5%). Similar trends were observed in the nonvirologic failure censored population. The multivariate analysis revealed that being of a nonblack race was significantly associated with improved response (P = .009). Overall, darunavir/ritonavir-based therapy was well tolerated, regardless of race. Diarrhea, nausea, and rash were the most commonly reported grade 2 to 4 adverse events (at least possibly related to darunavir/ritonavir). Darunavir/ritonavir treatment is safe and effective in treatment-experienced patients, irrespective of sex or race. Despite the controlled trial environment, more black patients discontinued and experienced virologic failure than Hispanic or white patients.

Background Dyslipidemia is a frequent complication of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV). The effects of ART on lipoproteins are less well-understood, and have not been investigated in a prospective study where assignment to ART is randomized. Objective To evaluate the effects of three class-sparing ART regimens on lipids and lipoproteins. Methods This was a substudy of a prospective, multicenter study of treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals randomly assigned to receive a regimen of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) + the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz, NRTIs + the protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir, or a NRTI-sparing regimen of efavirenz + lopinavir/ritonavir. Lipoproteins were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Results Among the 82 participants, total and small low-density lipoprotein concentrations increased by a median of 152 nmol/L (interquartile range, −49 to +407 nmol/L; P P P KW P P = 0.022). High-density lipoproteins increased by a median of 6.0 nmol/L (interquartile range, 2.8–10.4 nmol/L; P P KW = 0.069). Changes were not related to changes in markers of insulin/glucose metabolism. Conclusions Total and small low-density lipoprotein concentrations increased, especially in the arms containing lopinavir/ritonavir, as did increases in total very-low-density lipoproteins. Adverse changes were especially prominent in the arm with efavirenz + lopinavir/ritonavir.

Objectives This study evaluated the effects of 3 class-sparing antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens on endothelial function in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects participating in a randomized trial. Background Endothelial dysfunction has been observed in patients receiving ART for HIV infection. Methods This was a prospective, multicenter study of treatment-naive subjects who were randomly assigned to receive a protease inhibitor-sparing regimen of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) + efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing regimen of NRTIs + lopinavir/ritonavir, or a NRTI-sparing regimen of efavirenz + lopinavir/ritonavir. The NRTIs were lamivudine + stavudine, zidovudine, or tenofovir. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was determined by B-mode ultrasound before starting on ART, then after 4 and 24 weeks. Results There were 82 subjects (median age 35 years, 91% men, 54% white). Baseline CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) values were 245 cells/mm3 and 4.8 log10 copies/ml, respectively. At baseline, FMD was 3.68% (interquartile range [IQR] 1.98% to 5.51%). After 4 and 24 weeks of ART, plasma HIV RNA decreased by 2.1 and 3.0 log10 copies/ml, respectively. FMD increased by 0.74% (IQR −0.62% to +2.74%, p = 0.003) and 1.48% (IQR −0.20% to +4.30%, p 0.600). The decrease in plasma HIV RNA at 24 weeks was associated with greater FMD (rs = −0.30, p = 0.017). Conclusions Among treatment-naive individuals with HIV, 3 different ART regimens rapidly improved endothelial function. Benefits were similar for all ART regimens, appeared quickly, and persisted at 24 weeks.

Many cases of HIV infection in women in the United States are diagnosed very late in the course of their illness. HIV testing should be routinely recommended if a woman presents with certain gynecologic conditions or sexually transmitted diseases. Lack of awareness of HIV status leads to the majority of new sexually transmitted HIV infections. In the United States, most AIDS cases diagnosed among females in 2004 were attributable to high-risk heterosexual contact, disproportionately affecting black and Hispanic women. Depending on the racial/ethnic community being served, obstacles to access to care, including poverty, transportation issues, and cultural and language barriers, must be overcome. The full implications of gender differences in viral load and CD4 count in the treatment of women with HIV are not yet known. Clinical trial data on HIV therapies in women are limited, and most studies that have included women have not been powered to detect gender differences in virologic and immunologic success rates. Timing and choice of treatment are affected by the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs and the long-term complications of treatment, both of which may be different for men and women with HIV infection.

Background Because there are limited head-to-head data comparing antiretroviral combinations, physicians are tempted to rely on cross-trial comparisons to evaluate the relative efficacy of HIV drugs. However, a variety of factors can confound these comparisons, resulting in misleading or invalid conclusions. Objectives To compare and evaluate the use of: (i) versions 1.0 and 1.5 of the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR ® UltraSensitive assay, and (ii) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and plasma preparation (PPT) tubes on the proportion of HIV-infected patients who would be classified as virological responders in a multinational clinical trial. Study design The study utilized was a randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy and safety of atazanavir with efavirenz, each in combination with fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients. To evaluate the effect of monitor kit version, paired plasma samples from 634 patients at week 48 were analyzed using both versions 1.0 and 1.5 of the monitor kit. To evaluate the effect of collection tube type, paired plasma samples collected from 584 patients at week 52 using both EDTA and PPT tubes were assayed. Patients were classified as responders if HIV-1 RNA levels were below a pre-determined level of quantification (LOQ), both 400 and 50 copies/ml. Results and conclusions Substantially higher HIV-1 RNA levels were observed with monitor kit version 1.5, resulting in lower response rates. The version 1.0 monitor kit resulted in a 7% increase in patients classified as responders at the LOQ of 400 copies/ml and a 13% increase at the LOQ of 50 copies/ml. Consistently higher response rates (11% higher at the LOQ of 400 copies/ml and 34% higher at the LOQ of 50 copies/ml) were also observed when samples were collected in EDTA tubes compared with PPT tubes. Differences in monitor kit sensitivity and plasma collection procedures are key factors in study results and suggest caution when performing cross-study comparisons.

PURPOSE: This study assesses the efficacy and safety of fluconazole therapy in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and mild to moderately severe manifestations of disseminated histoplasmosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized prospective trial. All patients had AIDS and disseminated histoplasmosis. Patients were treated with 1,200 mg of fluconazole given by mouth once on the first day, then 600 mg once daily for 8 weeks, and those patients who improved clinically were then assigned fluconazole maintenance therapy 200 mg once daily for at least 1 year. Interim analysis revealed a high failure rate (10 of 20, 50%), causing revision of the protocol to increase the fluconazole dose to 1,600 mg given once on the first day, then 800 mg once daily, and the duration to 12 weeks for induction therapy and then 400 mg daily for 1 year for maintenance therapy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-six of 49 patients (74%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 59% to 85%) with mild to moderately severe clinical manifestations who entered into the revised study responded to 800 mg of fluconazole daily for 12 weeks as induction therapy. Of the seven patients who failed induction therapy because of progression of histoplasmosis, one died of the infection. Of 36 patients who entered into the maintenance phase of the study receiving 400 mg of fluconazole daily for 1 year, 11 (30.5%) relapsed, including one who died (2.8%). Two of the 49 patients (4.1%) were removed because of grade 4 adverse events, alkaline phosphatase elevation for one and aspartate aminotransferase elevation in the other. The relapse-free rate at 1 year was 53% (95% CI: 32% to 89%), prompting closure of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole 800 mg daily is a safe and moderately effective induction therapy for mild or moderately severe disseminated histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. On the basis of historic comparison, fluconazole 400 mg daily is less effective than itraconazole 200 to 400 mg daily or amphotericin B 50 mg given weekly as maintenance therapy to prevent relapse.