Search

BACKGROUND: Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients not amenable to epilepsy surgery can benefit from neurostimulation. Few data compare different neuromodulation strategies. OBJECTIVE: Compare five invasive neuromodulation strategies for treatment of DRE: anterior thalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation (ANT-DBS), centromedian thalamic nuclei DBS (CM-DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS), and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). METHODS: Single center retrospective review and phone survey for patients implanted with invasive neuromodulation for 2004–2021. RESULTS: N=159 (ANT-DBS=38, CM-DBS=19, RNS=30, CSS=32, VNS=40). Total median seizure reduction (MSR) was 61% for the entire cohort (IQR 5–90) and in descending order: CSS (85%), CM-DBS (63%), ANT-DBS (52%), RNS (50%), and VNS (50%); p=0.07. Responder rate was 60% after median follow-up time of 26 months. Seizure severity, life satisfaction and quality of sleep were improved. Cortical stimulation (RNS and CSS) was associated with improved seizure reduction compared to subcortical stimulation (ANT-DBS, CM-DBS, and VNS) (67% vs. 52%). Effectiveness was similar for focal epilepsy vs generalized epilepsy, closed loop vs open loop stimulation, pediatric vs. adult cases, and high frequency (>100 Hz) vs low frequency (

We performed one of the first systematic, population-based surveys of women in Amish culture. We used these data to examine health status and health risks in a representative sample of 288 Amish women ages 18–45 living in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, in particular for risks associated with preterm and low birthweight infants, compared with a general population sample of 2,002 women in Central Pennsylvania. Compared with women in the general population, Amish women rated their physical health approximately at the same level, but reported less stress, fewer symptoms of depression, and had higher aggregate scores for mental health. Amish women reported low levels of intimate partner violence, high levels of social support, and they perceived low levels of unfair treatment owing to gender compared with the general population. Amish women also reported higher fertility, fewer low birthweight babies, but the same number of preterm births as the general population. The findings suggest that these outcomes may be due to higher levels of social support and better preconceptional behavior among Amish women.