Search

Background Handwashing has long been promoted to maintain health and in preventing disease transmission. One of the most valuable ways to convey messages related to handwashing is through visual display, such as video for educational purposes and to enhance learning. Social media is an important and popular way to disseminate messages to a wide audience. Methods In this cross-sectional, descriptive study, two hashtags, #WashYourHands and #SafeguardSplash were used to select the sample of 100 from available TikTok videos. In order to code each video, the same coding categories were used for both hashtags, including (1) wetting and rinsing hands (2) lathering soap (3) time used for scrubbing (4) drying hands (5) mentions COVID-19 (6) mentions using hand sanitizer instead of soap (7) mentions how germs spread (8) mentions key times to wash hands (9) and actual depiction of washing hands. Additional descriptive categories were coded as well. The observations recorded were tabulated and descriptive statistics were performed. Independent one-tailed t-tests (α = .05) were calculated to determine if a video's hashtag had a significant association with its garnered views, likes, and/or comments. Results In total, the 100-video sample received 1,990,834,567 views, 40,355,468 likes, and 173,422 comments. Despite the fact that each hashtag made up an equal proportion (50%) of the total sample, videos with #WashYourHands accounted for 93.3% of the total views. Coverage of the important steps involved in handwashing, such as drying hands, was minimal as was relevant background information. Conclusion The results indicate that while this opportunity is being realized to some degree, the majority of videos did not cover topics related important concepts of hand hygiene. Given the high engagement of younger audiences with TikTok, this could be a powerful mechanism for demonstrating and encouraging proper handwashing, especially in a population with low rates of handwashing.

Background Dengue is the fastest spreading viral infection. A number of epidemics have occurred in subtropical and tropical regions of the United States. A future expansion and intensification of dengue has been predicted, partly due to changing environmental conditions. In the absence of treatment, prevention and control are vital to addressing this vector-borne disease. Health education and community engagement are a key part of such efforts. Given that the majority of Americans search for health information online, ensuring the readability of web-based dengue information is an important consideration for health officials. To date, there is a dearth of information on this topic. Methods To address this gap, "Dengue fever" was searched using Google Chrome to generate a sample of 100 websites. Using Readable.io, the readability of these 100 sites was then determined using five different tests. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Results The results indicate that the vast majority of online materials on dengue are written at a level far beyond what is recommended. Three of the five tests did not find any of the sampled sites to be appropriate in terms of readability. In general, the websites analyzed tended to be written at a level beyond the 10th grade. Conclusion These findings have important implications for future dengue outbreaks in the United States.

To explore the degree and predictors of and barriers to school garden integration (termed success).A 30-item online survey consisting of demographic, garden characteristic, and barrier questions, as well as the School Garden Integration Scale, was conducted in 266 school garden organizations (13 national, 8 regional, and 245 state or local).A total of 414 school gardeners from 38 states and Puerto Rico.School garden success using the GREEN Tool.Descriptive statistics were used to determine the degree of success of school garden programs and explore barriers. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine independent predictors of school garden success.The average score was 37 (range 1-53, of a possible 57 points), indicating moderate success. Operating budget (P.001), operating time (P.05), and planting in-ground (P.01) had a positive significant influence on success score, whereas rural location (P.01) and lacking community interest (P.01) had a negative significant influence, controlling for race/ethnicity, region, total garden investment, and Community Need Index score (a proxy for socioeconomic status).Results indicate that success of school garden programs may be more difficult for the schools located in a rural area or in the absence of school or community-at-large interest. This study found that race/ethnicity of students and socioeconomic status are not related to success score, which is promising as other research indicates that successful school gardens may be especially impactful for low-income people of color. Causal research is needed to identify strategies that increase school garden success, with a focus on engaging key stakeholders (administrators, teachers, parents, the community at large, and garden coordinators).

Background Influenza (flu) is pervasive and burdensome. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability levels of online articles related to flu. Methods Using the search term “influenza,” the URL's of the first 100 English language Web sites were vetted for content to ascertain that the article met inclusion criteria. Five recommended readability tests were conducted using an online service to calculate readability. Overall, the analysis indicates that flu material found on the web is not being written at a level that is widely readable. Results None of the 100 sites included in the analysis received an acceptable score on all 5 assessments. One-sample independent t tests (α = 0.05, df = 99) indicated that it is highly unlikely that flu Web sites are being written at the desirable level. Of the 100 sampled sites, 33 had a .com, 29 had a .org, and 22 had a .gov extension. Extension type did not play a role in readability level of these sites. Conclusions When creating content for the masses, health professionals should maximize their efforts by testing the readability as well as other factors that influence the likelihood that it will be understood.

Objectives The key to reducing mortality from skin cancer depends on early detection and treatment, which, in many cases, means a patient should be informed and possess the self-efficacy necessary to seek expert opinion. The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of skin cancer materials on the Internet using the commonly used readability tests. Study design This is a cross-sectional study. Methods A search was conducted using the key words ‘skin cancer.’ The first 15 pages of websites that contained English language articles on skin cancer comprised the sample for this study. All English language articles appearing on these websites were analyzed using the Readable.io service to automate popular readability scores. For each article, it was determined if it was generated from a .org, .com, .gov, .net, .edu or other source. Five readability tests were conducted on the materials to determine the ease with which one can read each article. Results Of the 102 websites sampled, none received an acceptable score on all five assessments. In fact, more than 90% of the websites sampled received an unacceptable score on any one of the five assessments, and more than 78% of the websites sampled received an unacceptable level on all five assessments. All five readability assessments demonstrated statistically significant results; each P- value obtained from the t -tests was substantially below 0.01 and, hence, below the α = 0.05 threshold. These results indicate that it is unlikely that skin cancer websites are being written at the recommended level. Of the websites sampled, roughly 42% were .com, and slightly more than 36% were .org. Statistical evidence indicated that neither .com nor .org websites are likely to be written at the acceptable level. Conclusions Both for-profit and non-profit agencies which aim to provide health information to consumers should be mindful of the readability levels of the materials they disperse.

The purpose of this study was to determine the readability of 100 articles posted on the Internet related to the Zika virus. An on-line readability calculator was used to generate scores on each website from 5 readability tests. Most of the material analyzed was written at a level beyond grade 10. The data in this study make a compelling case that websites containing information on the Zika virus are being written at levels beyond what is recommended. It would behoove those who create health information to consider ways to adapt their materials in a way that is consistent with recommended readability levels.