Search

Summary Background & aims The diagnosis of catheter sepsis in patients on home parenteral nutrition can be difficult and patients often do not present with classical symptoms of pyrexia whilst feeding. This study reviews the clinical and diagnostic criteria needed to diagnose catheter sepsis. Methods A retrospective consecutive notes review of 2 years of patients presenting with catheter infections assessed symptoms, inflammatory markers and some liver function tests. The same data was also collected on those same patients who had successfully under gone line salvage. The two sets were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test and predictive calculations were carried out using receiver operated characteristic curves. Results Over the two year period there were 37 episodes of CRBSI in 31 patients recorded. Successful catheter salvage was achieved in 30 episodes (in 24 patients) which is an 81% salvage rate. The most significant abnormality seen was a raised C-reactive protein, but less than a third of patients had a raised white cell count. However, there were significant changes in the bilirubin (p = 0.0007) and albumin (p = 0.0013) in these patients. Almost a third of patients who feel unwell do not present with a raised temperature. Conclusions The diagnosis of CRBSI remains difficult, but it should be suspected in patients with newly abnormal CRP, albumin or bilirubin and in the non-specifically unwell patient a clinician should not be misled by a normal white cell count and apyrexia.

Aims: This study was undertaken to report indications and practice of home enteral nutrition (HEN) in Europe. Methods: A questionnaire on HEN practice was sent to 23 centres from Belgium (B), Denmark (D), France (F), Germany (G), Italy (I), Poland (P), Spain (S) and the United Kingdom (UK). This involved adult patients newly registered in HEN programme from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1998. Results: A total of 1397 patients (532 women, 865 men) were registered. The median incidence of HEN was 163 patients/million inhabitants/year (range: 62–457). Age distribution was 7.5%, 16–40 years; 37.1%, 41–65 years; 34.5%, 66–80 years and 20.9% >80 years. The chief underlying diseases were a neurological disorder (49.1%), or head and neck cancer (26.5%); the main reason for HEN was dysphagia (84.6%). A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (58.2%) or a naso-gastric tube (29.3%) were used to infuse commercial standard or high energy diets (65.3%), or fibre diets (24.5%); infusion was cyclical (61.5%) or bolus (34.1%). Indications and feeds were quite similar throughout the different centres but some differences exist concerning the underlying disease. There was greater variation in the choice of tubes and mode of infusion. In F, G, I, S, and UK, costs of HEN are fully funded. In B, D, and P patients have to pay part or all of the charges. Conclusions: In Europe, HEN was utilised mainly in dysphagic patients with neurological disorders or cancer, using a standard feed via a PEG. However, there were important differences among the countries in the underlying diseases treated, the routes used, the mode of administration and the funding.

The British Artificial Nutrition Survey (BANS) was established in 1996 by the British Association for Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition to audit and research nutritional care in hospital and the community, with the overall aim of improving the quality of nutritional support in patients with disease-related malnutrition. In this article the following information emerging from BANS is presented: growth and prevalence of artificial nutrition (enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition), clinical outcome of a wide range of diagnoses receiving artificial nutrition in the community, an economic perspective on home artificial nutrition, and some ethical issues. This information is used to illustrate how BANS can be of value in a wide range of health care activities, including health planning, health economics, clinical practice and patient care.