Search

Induction of the suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS-3) gene is vital to the normal control of inflammatory signalling. In order to understand these processes we investigated the role of the proto-oncogene component of the AP-1 transcription factor complex, c-Jun, in the regulation of SOCS-3 gene induction. We found that cyclic AMP stimulation of HUVECs promoted phosphorylation and activation of JNK MAP kinase and its substrate c-Jun. The JNK responsive element of the human SOCS-3 promoter mapped to a putative AP-1 site within 1000 bp of the transcription start site. The PKC inhibitors, GF-109203X, Gö-6983 and Ro-317549, were all found to inhibit AP-1 transcriptional activity, transcriptional activation of this minimal SOCS-3 promoter and SOCS-3 gene induction in HUVECs. Interestingly, Ro-317549 treatment was also found to promote PKC-dependent activation of ERK and JNK MAP kinases and promote JNK-dependent hyper-phosphorylation of c-Jun, whereas GF-109203X and Gö-6983 had little effect. Despite this, all three PKC inhibitors were found to be effective inhibitors of c-Jun DNA-binding activity. The JNK-dependent hyper-phosphorylation of c-Jun in response to Ro-317549 treatment of HUVECs does therefore not interfere with its ability to inhibit c-Jun activity and acts as an effective inhibitor of c-Jun-dependent SOCS-3 gene induction., Highlights ► Ro-317549 triggers hyper-phosphorylation of c-Jun in HUVECs. ► Elevations in intracellular cyclic AMP also induce JNK-dependent, c-Jun activation. ► c-Jun is required for the full transcriptional activation of the human SOCS-3 gene. ► Ro-317549, GF-109203X and Gö 6983 inhibit c-Jun and SOCS-3 gene induction.

Background: Bioinformatic analysis revealed that PAR4 possesses an ER retention motif. Results: PAR2 both abrogates and facilitates chaperone protein interaction with PAR4 to allow PAR4 to evade ER retention and be delivered to the plasma membrane. Conclusion: PAR2 regulates PAR4 localization and cell signaling through heterodimerization. Significance: Impact upon understanding PAR2 and PAR4 in inflammation where clear roles are defined., Proteinase-activated receptors 4 (PAR4) is a class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) recognized through the ability of serine proteases such as thrombin and trypsin to mediate receptor activation. Due to the irreversible nature of activation, a fresh supply of receptor is required to be mobilized to the cell surface for responsiveness to agonist to be sustained. Unlike other PAR subtypes, the mechanisms regulating receptor trafficking of PAR4 remain unknown. Here, we report novel features of the intracellular trafficking of PAR4 to the plasma membrane. PAR4 was poorly expressed at the plasma membrane and largely retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in a complex with the COPI protein subunit β-COP1. Analysis of the PAR4 protein sequence identified an arginine-based (RXR) ER retention sequence located within intracellular loop-2 (R183AR → A183AA), mutation of which allowed efficient membrane delivery of PAR4. Interestingly, co-expression with PAR2 facilitated plasma membrane delivery of PAR4, an effect produced through disruption of β-COP1 binding and facilitation of interaction with the chaperone protein 14-3-3ζ. Intermolecular FRET studies confirmed heterodimerization between PAR2 and PAR4. PAR2 also enhanced glycosylation of PAR4 and activation of PAR4 signaling. Our results identify a novel regulatory role for PAR2 in the anterograde traffic of PAR4. PAR2 was shown to both facilitate and abrogate protein interactions with PAR4, impacting upon receptor localization and cell signal transduction. This work is likely to impact markedly upon the understanding of the receptor pharmacology of PAR4 in normal physiology and disease.

A range of studies have indicated that many rhodopsin-like, family A G protein-coupled receptors, including the beta(2)-adrenoceptor, exist and probably function as dimers. It is less clear if receptors internalize as dimers and if agonist occupancy of only one element of a dimer is sufficient to cause internalization of a receptor dimer into the cell. We have used a chemogenomic approach to demonstrate that this is the case. Following expression of the wild type beta(2)-adrenoceptor, isoprenaline but not 1-(3''4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone, which does not have significant affinity for the wild type receptor, caused receptor internalization. By contrast, 1-(3'4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone, but not isoprenaline that does not have high affinity for the mutated receptor, caused internalization of Asp(113)Serbeta(2)-adrenoceptor. Following co-expression of wild type and Asp(113)Serbeta(2)-adrenoceptors each of isoprenaline and 1-(3'4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone caused the co-internalization of both of these two forms of the receptor. Co-expressed wild type and Asp(113)Serbeta(2)-adrenoceptors were able to be co-immunoprecipitated and 1-(3'4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone produced internalization of the wild type receptor that was not prevented by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol that binds with high affinity only to the wild type receptor. These results demonstrate that agonist occupancy of either single binding site of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor dimer is sufficient to cause internalization of the dimer and that antagonist occupation of one of the two ligand binding sites is unable to prevent agonist-mediated internalization.

The structural basis of the quaternary organization of rhodopsin has recently been explored and modeled. Because information obtained from studying rhodopsin has frequently been directly applicable to other G protein-coupled receptors we wished to ascertain if dimeric and/or oligomeric forms of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor could be observed and if so whether rhodopsin might provide insights into the quaternary structure of this receptor. Co-immunoprecipitation and both conventional and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies demonstrated quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and, in concert with the reconstitution of fragments of this receptor, provided information on the molecular basis of these interactions. Development of three color fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) allowed the imaging of alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor oligomers in single living cells. Mutation of hydrophobic residues in transmembrane domains I and IV of the receptor resulted in marked reduction in three color FRET suggesting an alteration in oligomeric organization and potential similarities with rhodopsin. The mutated alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor was unable to reach the cell surface, did not become terminally N-glycosylated and was unable to signal.

Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor S1P 3 is increased specifically in response to S1P. Truncation of the receptor's carboxyl-terminal domain revealed that the presence of a serine-rich stretch of residues between Leu332 and Val352 was essential to observe this effect. Although agonist-occupied wild-type (WT) S1P 3 could be phosphorylated in vitro by G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), a role of S1P 3 phosphorylation in controlling S1P 3 –G q/11 coupling was excluded since A) a phosphorylation-resistant S1P 3 mutant desensitised in a manner indistinguishable from the WT receptor and was phosphorylated to a greater extent than the WT receptor by GRK2 in vitro, and B) co-expression with GRK2 or GRK3 failed to potentiate S1P 3 phosphorylation. S1P 3 phosphorylation was also not required for receptor sequestration away from the cell surface. Together, these data suggest that S1P 3 function is not subject to conventional regulation by GRK phosphorylation and that novel aspects of S1P 3 function distinct from classical G-protein coupling and receptor internalisation may be controlled its carboxyl-terminal domain.

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.

Co-expression of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) in cells derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) knock-out mouse allows agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels that is transduced by beta/gamma released from the G protein alpha subunit. Mutation of Tyr(356) of Galpha(11) to Phe, within a receptor contact domain, had little effect on function but this was reduced greatly by alteration to Ser and virtually eliminated by conversion to Asp. This pattern was replicated following incorporation of each form of Galpha(11) into fusion proteins with the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor. Following a [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding assay, immunoprecipitation of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(11) fusion protein indicated that the agonist phenylephrine stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha(11) more than 30-fold. Information transfer by agonist was controlled in residue 356 Galpha(11) mutants with rank order TyrPheTrpIleAla = Gln = ArgSerAsp, although these alterations did not alter the binding affinity of either phenylephrine or an antagonist ligand. Mutation of a beta/gamma contact interface in the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Tyr(356) Galpha(11) fusion protein did not alter ligand binding affinity but did reduce greatly beta/gamma binding and phenylephrine stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. It also prevented agonist elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as did a mutation in Galpha(11) that prevents G protein subunit dissociation. These results indicate that a bulky aromatic group is required four amino acids from the C terminus of Galpha(11) to maximize information transfer from an agonist-occupied receptor and disprove the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation of this residue is required for G protein activation (Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881). This is distinct from Galpha(i1), where hydrophobicity of the amino acid is the key determinant at this location. They also further demonstrate a key role for the beta/gamma complex in enhancing receptor to G protein alpha subunit information transfer.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.

α-Adrenoceptor blocker drugs are commonly used in the clinical (non-surgical) treatment of BPH. α1-adrenoceptors were originally sub-divided using agonists but, subsequently, were sub-divided using only antagonists in ligand-ligand interactions, which did not require agonists at all. Ultimately, proof that adrenoceptors are functional receptors for the natural ligands, noradrenaline and adrenaline, requires that agonists be used. The earlier excitement engendered by finding varying agonist potency series in different tissues has not been revisited to place it in the context of current concepts of α1-adrenoceptor subtypes. This review will consider the advantages and limitations of different agonists for the study of α1-adrenoceptor subtypes including ‘extreme’ examples where the archetypal α1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine activates α2-adrenoceptors and others where UK14304, often the α2-adrenoceptor agonist of choice, activates α1-adrenoceptors. New work will also be presented showing the interaction between agonists and the fluorescent α1-adrenoceptor antagonist QAPB. This introduces the novel point of view of studying the displacement of antagonists by agonists. Possible errors in antagonist classification arising from complexity in the actions of agonists and the recently developed method of fluorescent ligand binding on isolated living human prostatic smooth muscle cells will be discussed.

We measured the rates of 125 I − and 86 Rb + efflux from preloaded, cultured equine sweat gland cells. The calcium ionophore ionomycin increased the efflux of both isotopes. Anion efflux was unaffected by Ba 2+ , but this cation inhibited 86 Rb + -efflux, suggesting that [Ca 2+ ] i -activated potassium channels were present. Activation of these channels was not, however, important for the efflux of anions. We measured 125 I − efflux from valinomycin-depolarised cells in which anion cotransport was inhibited. Changes in 125 I − efflux reflect changes in anion permeability under these conditions, and ionomycin caused a clear permeability increase that was abolished by the anion channel blocker diphenylamine-2-carboxylate. ATP and UTP increased the efflux of both isotopes, suggesting that type P 2U purine receptors allow these nucleotides to regulate membrane permeability.

Fragments of rat submandibular gland were loaded with 86 Rb + and superfused so that the rate of 86 Rb + -efflux could be quantified as an indicator of potassium permeability. Acetylcholine evoked an increase in permeability consisting of a transient, calcium-independent response and a sustained, calcium-dependent. Total removal of external sodium significantly inhibited both phases of this response. The results thus confirm that the cholinergic regulation of potassium permeability is compromised by removal of external sodium but do not support the view that this is due, exclusively, to an effect on calcium influx.