Search

Background Salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) – performed open or minimally-invasive - is a treatment modality that can be offered to patients with nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), especially in times where modern imaging methods like choline- or PSMA-PET/CT are available. Yet, there are only very limited data on the safety and oncological effectiveness of robotic sLND. Methods We retrospectively identified patients who underwent robotic sLND at our institution between 2013 and 2017 for nodal recurrence after RP, which had been diagnosed either by 18F-choline- or 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. We analyzed perioperative data and early oncological outcomes with a focus on the comparison of patients with preoperative choline- vs. those with preoperative PSMA-PET/CT. Results We identified 36 patients who underwent robotic sLND at a median time of 45.3 months [range 3.1;228.6] after RP, with nodal recurrences detected in 25 patients by PSMA- and in 11 by choline-PET/CT. Median preoperative PSA, operation time and blood loss were 1.98 ng/ml [range 0.09;35.15], 129.5 min [range 65;202] and 50 ml [range 0;400], respectively. No high-grade complications occurred. A median number of 6.5 [range 1;25] lymph nodes were removed with a median of 1 [range 0;9] tumor-occupied node. None of the patients received any adjuvant treatment. Median postoperative PSA-change was −57% [range −100; +58] in the PSMA- and +10% [range −91; +95] in the choline-group (p = 0.015). 44% of patients in the PSMA- and 18% of patients in the choline-group experienced complete biochemical response (cBCR; PSA Conclusions This is the hitherto largest series on robotic sLND for nodal recurrence after RP. Robotic sLND is a feasible therapeutic option with low morbidity, which can at least delay the initiation of further therapy – in some patients up to several years. However, the extend of sLND has to be standardized and randomized trials are needed to finally define the oncological effectiveness of this approach.

The molecular carcinogenesis of lung cancer has yet to be clearly elucidated. We investigated the possible oncogenic function of SEC62 in lung cancer, which was predicted based on our previous findings that lung and thyroid cancer tissue samples exhibited increased Sec62 protein levels. The SEC62 gene locus is at 3q26.2, and 3q amplification is reportedly the most common genomic alteration in non–small cell lung cancer. We analyzed SEC62 mRNA and protein levels in tissue samples from lung cancer patients by real-time quantitative PCR, Western blot, and IHC and found significantly increased SEC62 mRNA and protein levels in tumors compared with tumor-free tissue samples from the same patients. Correlation analyses revealed significantly higher Sec62 levels in tumors with lymph node metastases compared with nonmetastatic tumors, as well as in poorly compared with moderately differentiated tumors. On the basis of these promising results, we examined the role of Sec62 in cancer cell biology in vitro . Cell migration assays with lung and thyroid cancer cells showed distinct stimulation of migration in SEC62 -overexpressing cells and inhibition of migration in Sec62-depleted cells. Moreover, we found that SEC62 silencing sensitized the cells to thapsigargin-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Thus, our results indicate that SEC62 represents a potential candidate oncogene in the amplified 3q region in cases of non–small cell lung cancer and harbors various functions in cancer cell biology.