1. Starting a new conversation: Engaging Veterans with spinal cord injury in discussions of what function means to them, the barriers/facilitators they encounter, and the adaptations they use to optimize function
- Author
-
Jennifer N. Hill, Keshonna Lones, Sherri L. LaVela, and Salva N. Balbale
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,030506 rehabilitation ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Activities of daily living ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Applied psychology ,Coding (therapy) ,Context (language use) ,Level design ,Article ,Disability Evaluation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Physical medicine and rehabilitation ,Activities of Daily Living ,Photovoice ,Humans ,Medicine ,Disabled Persons ,Conversation ,Function (engineering) ,Spinal Cord Injuries ,Aged ,Veterans ,media_common ,Aged, 80 and over ,Paraplegia ,business.industry ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Self-Help Devices ,Military Personnel ,Attitude ,Wheelchairs ,Personal Autonomy ,Environment Design ,Female ,Independent Living ,0305 other medical science ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Independent living - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessments of function in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) often utilize pre-defined constructs and measures without consideration of patient context, including how patients define function and what matters to them. OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: We utilized photovoice to understand how individuals define function, facilitators and barriers to function, and adaptations to support functioning. METHODS: Veterans with SCI were provided with cameras and guidelines to take photographs of things that: (1) help with functioning, (2) are barriers to function, and (3) represent adaptations used to support functioning. Interviews to discuss photographs followed and were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using grounded-thematic coding. Nvivo 8 was used to store and organize data. RESULTS: Participants (n = 9) were male (89%), Caucasian (67%), had paraplegia (75%), averaged 64 years of age, and were injured, on average, for 22 years. Function was described in several ways: the concept of ‘normalcy,’ aspects of daily living, and ability to be independent. Facilitators included: helpful tools, physical therapy/therapists, transportation, and caregivers. Barriers included: wheelchair-related issues and interior/exterior barriers both in the community and in the hospital. Examples of adaptations included: traditional examples like ramps, and also creative examples like the use of rubber bands on a can to help with grip. CONCLUSION(S): Patient-perspectives elicited in-depth information that expanded the common definition of function by highlighting the concept of “normality,” facilitators and barriers to function, and adaptations to optimize function. These insights emphasize function within a patient-context, emphasizing a holistic definition of function that can be used to develop personalized, patient-driven care plans. Published by Elsevier Inc.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF