Search

Native Americans (NAs) have higher pain rates than the general U.S. population. It has been found that increased central sensitization and reduced pain inhibition are pronociceptive processes that increase pain risk; yet, little attention has focused on the influence of psychosocial factors. Discrimination is a psychosocial factor associated with increased pain in other minoritized groups; however, it is unclear whether it also promotes pain in NAs. This study analyzed data from 269 healthy, pain-free participants (N = 134 non-Hispanic whites [NHWs], N = 135 NAs) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk. Experienced discrimination was measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS). Nociceptive processes were measured via static measures of spinal sensitivity (nociceptive flexion reflex [NFR] threshold, 3-stimulation NFR threshold), temporal summation of pain (TS-Pain) and nociceptive flexion reflex (TS-NFR), and conditioned pain modulation of pain (CPM-Pain) and NFR (CPM-NFR). Results demonstrated that greater discrimination was associated with enhanced TS-NFR and impaired CPM-NFR but not static measures of spinal sensitivity or measures of pain modulation (TS-Pain, CPM-Pain). Although the effects of discrimination on outcomes were similar in both groups (not moderated by ethnicity), NAs experienced higher levels of discrimination and therefore discrimination mediated a relationship between ethnicity and impaired CPM-NFR. This indicates experienced discrimination may promote a pain risk phenotype in NAs that involves spinal sensitization resulting from impaired inhibition of spinal nociception without sensitization of pain experience. PERSPECTIVE: This study found that discrimination was associated with spinal sensitization and impaired descending inhibition of spinal nociception. These findings bolster our understanding of how social stressors experienced disproportionately by minoritized groups can contribute to pain outcomes.

Sexual assault (SA) is associated with an increased risk of chronic pain, but the mechanisms for this relationship are poorly understood. To explore whether disrupted descending inhibition is involved, this study used a conditioned pain modulation task to study the inhibition of pain and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR; a correlate of spinal nociception) in 32 pain-free SA survivors. This group was compared with 32 pain-free, trauma-exposed persons without SA and a group of 40 pain-free persons who reported no trauma exposure. Conditioned pain modulation was assessed from painful electric stimulations (test stimulus) delivered to the ankle before, during, and after participants submerged their hand in painful 10°C water (conditioning stimulus). Pain ratings and NFR were assessed in response to test stimuli. All groups demonstrated significant inhibition of pain during conditioned pain modulation. However, only the no trauma exposure group demonstrated significant inhibition of NFR. The persons without SA group showed no inhibition of NFR, whereas the SA group showed significant facilitation of the NFR. These findings suggest that trauma exposure may impair inhibitory cerebrospinal circuits, but that SA may specifically promote facilitation of spinal nociception. Perspective: This study suggests that trauma exposure disrupts the cerebrospinal inhibition of spinal nociception, but that exposure to SA further promotes chronic pain risk by facilitating spinal nociception. This finding help may help to elucidate the pain risk mechanisms in trauma survivors.

Native Americans (NAs) have a higher prevalence of chronic pain than any other U.S. racial/ethnic group; however, little is known about the mechanisms for this pain disparity. This study used quantitative sensory testing to assess pain experience in healthy, pain-free adults (n = 137 NAs (87 female), n = 145 non-Hispanic whites (NHW; 68 female)) after painful electric, heat, cold, ischemic, and pressure stimuli. After each stimulus, ratings of pain intensity, sensory pain, affective pain, pain-related anxiety, and situation-specific pain catastrophizing were assessed. The results suggested that NAs reported greater sensory pain in response to suprathreshold electric and heat stimuli, greater pain-related anxiety to heat and ischemic stimuli, and more catastrophic thoughts in response to electric and heat stimuli. Sex differences were also noted; however, with the exception of catastrophic thoughts to cold, these finding were not moderated by race/ethnicity. Together, findings suggest NAs experience heightened sensory, anxiety, and catastrophizing reactions to painful stimuli. This could place NAs at risk for future chronic pain and could ultimately lead to a vicious cycle that maintains pain (eg, pain → anxiety/catastrophizing → pain). Perspective NAs experienced heightened sensory, anxiety, and catastrophizing reactions in response to multiple pain stimuli. Given the potential for anxiety and catastrophic thoughts to amplify pain, this characteristic may place them at risk for pain disorders and could lead to a vicious cycle that maintains pain.

Poor sleep quality is often comorbid with chronic pain. Research has also shown that poor and disrupted sleep may increase risk for chronic pain by promoting pronociceptive processes. This could occur through disrupted emotional modulation of pain since poor sleep can impact emotional experience and emotional experience modulates pain and nociception. To assess the pain system, nociceptive flexion reflexes (spinal level), pain-evoked potentials (supraspinal level), and perceived pain were recorded during an emotional picture-viewing task in which 37 healthy individuals received painful electric stimulations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index assessed sleep quality. Individuals with poor sleep quality were unable to inhibit signals at the spinal level in response to positive pictures, whereas emotional modulation of supraspinal nociception and pain perception remained unaffected by sleep quality. This suggests poor sleep quality may promote pronociception by impairing descending, emotional modulation of spinal nociception.

Habituation (ie, decreases in responding) and sensitization (ie, increases in responding) after prolonged or repeated exposures to a fixed stimulus have been identified as important in adaptation to repeated or prolonged noxious stimulation. Determinants of habituation or sensitization are poorly understood, and experimental investigation of habituation of pain ratings have generally relied on pain reports and statistical techniques that average responses across a group of participants. Using a cross-sectional design, the current study used multilevel growth curve analyses to examine changes in the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR), a spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex, and pain ratings in response to 12 repeated, constant intensity, noxious electrocutaneous stimuli. Unconditional growth curve models indicated that, on average, participants evidenced habituation of the NFR and sensitization of pain ratings. However, a substantial subgroup of participants exhibited the opposite pattern of change. In conditional models, behavioral inhibition, b = .10, P = .003, and behavioral activation, b = −.07, P = .07, independently interacted with the growth curve to predict changes in NFR, but not pain ratings, across the 12 stimuli. These findings provide preliminary experimental support for Jensen and colleagues' 2-factor model of pain experience and implicate a role for approach and avoidance motivations in descending modulation of NFR. Perspective Using repeated NFR stimulation, this study showed that most participants exhibited NFR habituation and pain sensitization; however, a substantial subgroup showed an opposite pattern of pain habituation (25.0%) and NFR sensitization (31.4%). Further, NFR habituation was moderated by individual differences in behavioral activation and behavioral inhibition.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the possibility of sample size as a possible source of heterogeneity in trials comparing the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold (NFRthr) in fibromyalgia (FM) patients and healthy controls. Methods: A systematic search strategy was designed and conducted in electronic databases such as Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Libraries, Embase, and PsycINFO. In total, nine scholarly records were filtered by the inclusion and exclusion criteria, passed for data extraction (e.g. study designs and settings; methodology; total, male, and female sample sizes in FM and healthy control groups, and effect sizes), and statistical analyses (e.g. metaanalysis and meta-regression). Using random-effects model, the effect size (i.e. mean difference between the NFRthr in FM patients and healthy controls) was meta-analyzed. Investigating the sample size as a possible source of heterogeneity and utilizing a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) technique, the trials’ effect sizes were meta-regressed in multiple meta-regression against the total, male, and female sample sizes. Prior to any investigations, the aims of this research were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42019140354). Results: Results indicated the deficit in NFRthr (overall mean difference = −3.16; 95% 𝐶𝐼: −6.82 𝑡𝑜 0.50) was heterogenous (𝐼 2 = 0.91, 𝜏 2 = 25.04, 𝜒2= 91.22, df & < 0.00001) and the overall effect was not statistically significant (Z = 1.69; 𝑃 = 0.09). The multiple meta-regression analyses indicated that one of the main sources of bias to the effect size in the trials was found to be the total (𝑆𝑆𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = −0.0570; 𝑃 = 0.040) and female (𝑆𝑆𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒 = −0.0569; 𝑃 = 0.047) sample sizes that participated in the studies. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the total and female sample sizes might be possible sources of bias to effect sizes determined in NFRthr in FM patient and healthy controls. A possible solution might be to conduct sex-specific trials to determine the NFRthr among FM patients in future research. Funding Statement: Authors received no source of funding for this research. Declaration of Interests: Authors declare no conflict of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42019140354

Compared to other racial/ethnic minority groups, Native Americans (NAs) are more likely to report experiences of discrimination and also have the highest prevalence of pain conditions. Thus, there is a need to understand how and why these disproportionately high rates occur. Discrimination has been conceptualized within the biopsychosocial model as a chronic psychosocial stressor that can lead to dysfunction of regulatory processes, such as pain. A recent study found that perceived discrimination increased psychological distress that, in turn, led to increased chronic pain. To date, these relationships have not yet been evaluated in NAs. The present study examined perceived discrimination, stress, and pain tolerance in healthy, pain-free NAs (N=112) and NHWs (N=128). Discrimination was measured with the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS), stress was measured with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and pain tolerance was measured in reaction to cold, heat, electrocutaneous, and ischemia pain stimuli. Results indicated NAs experienced more discrimination than NHWs (p

Identification of those at risk for chronic pain development may help prevent its onset. The relationship between blood pressure (BP) and pain processing has been studied extensively, but it is unknown whether BP is related to future pain onset. The current study examined whether resting BP predicts the development of chronic pain in participants from the OK-SNAP study who were healthy and pain-free at the time of enrollment. BP was recorded 3 times and averaged at the time of enrollment. Following the OK-SNAP main study, participants were contacted every 6 months to assess for chronic pain. Of the 139 Native American (NA) and 147 non-Hispanic white (NHW) participants enrolled, 208 (73%) responded to at least 1 follow-up. Participants were deemed to have chronic pain if they experienced pain for >3 months that did not remit at subsequent follow-ups (N=35; 17%). These persons were compared to those that reported no persistent pain at any follow-up (N=133; 64%). First, zero-order correlations were conducted between chronic pain onset, BP, and control variables. Systolic BP, diastolic BP, race, general health perception, and age were significantly related to chronic pain onset (ps

The tendency to inhibit anger (anger-in) is associated with increased pain. This relationship may be explained by the negative affectivity hypothesis such that those with high anger-in experience increased negative affectivity and thus increased pain (because negative affect enhances pain). Alternatively, this relationship may be explained by the cognitive resource hypothesis such that anger-in limits attentional resources normally available for pain modulation. The present study examined these competing hypotheses in healthy, pain-free participants using a well-validated picture viewing paradigm (ie, Emotional Controls of Nociception, ECON). ECON is a paradigm in which painful, electrocutaneous stimulations are delivered during and in between pictures of emotional content (mutilation, neutral, and erotica). Pain ratings were assessed in response to electric stimuli. This allows for the assessment of emotional modulation of pain by comparing pain evoked during mutilation and erotic pictures to pain evoked during neutral pictures. Additionally, ECON allows for the assessment of attentional modulation of pain by comparing pain evoked during neutral pictures (distraction) to pain evoked in the absence of pictures (control). Prior to ECON, participants filled out the Anger Expression Inventory to assess their tendency to inhibit anger and 2 groups were formed (high anger-in, N = 71 and low anger-in, N = 27) from their responses (ie, +/- 1SD from the normative mean of anger-in). Results found that both groups demonstrated similar emotional modulation of pain. By contrast, persons in the low anger-in group displayed attentional modulation of pain, whereas persons in the high anger-in group failed to attentionally modulate pain. These findings suggest that cognitive resource deficits in high anger-in individuals may contribute to increased pain risk.

Trauma exposure, especially sexual assault (SA), is highly correlated with pain conditions, in that many chronic pain samples report trauma histories. However, our understanding of the mechanisms behind this relationship is limited. Previous findings from our lab suggest that SA disrupts descending pain modulation. However, to date, no study has used quantitative sensory testing (QST) to comprehensively assess the pain system in SA survivors. 41 healthy, pain-free SA survivors were matched to a group of 41 healthy, pain-free trauma exposed persons without SA (TE). These groups were compared to a group of healthy, pain-free persons with no trauma history (no-TE; N=62). QST included warm, cool, heat, cold, ischemia, and electric thresholds, and heat, cold, ischemia, and electric tolerances. The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold was used to assess spinal nociception. Results suggested SA survivors had higher cool thresholds than the TE and no-TE groups. Moreover, SA survivors had lower cold thresholds, cold tolerances, and heat tolerances than no-TE. Surprisingly, SA survivors had higher ischemia tolerances than no-TE and TE groups. The TE group had lower heat and cold tolerances than the no-TE group. None of the other group differences were significant for any pain outcome. These findings suggest that SA is associated with greater sensitivity in A-delta fibers (cool thresholds) and hyperalgesia in response to thermal stimuli (heat, cold). However, hypoalgesia was noted in response to deep tissue pain (ischemia). By contrast, TE is primarily associated with reduced tolerance to heat and cold. These group differences are not likely due to spinal sensitization due to the lack of group differences in NFR. Future studies are needed to replicate these findings and determine whether QST responses can predict negative sequela of SA and non-SA trauma exposure.

Previous research has explored cultural differences concerning the prevalence, response, and treatment preferences of individuals experiencing pain. However, the meaning of these painful experiences has not been comprehensively examined. Research tends to generalize findings from predominantly European American samples and assume universality of their findings across cultures. Numerous studies have demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of physical pain in Native Americans (NA) compared to non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Because of this, it is important to consider whether our current understanding of painful experiences is indeed universal. To accomplish this, a semi-structured interview was administered to 156 NAs and 151 NHWs that asked open-ended questions related to: words used to describe physically injurious experiences, the purpose of pain, individual and culture-specific pain meaning, and words for the opposite of pain. Next, themes were generated from transcripts and two raters blind to participants’ racial/ethnic group coded transcripts for the themes. Strong agreement between raters was obtained (Kappa= .75-1.00). Chi-square analyses assessed whether the frequency of responses for themes were different between NHWs and NAs. In general, frequency of themes were similar between groups; nonetheless, a few small group differences were noted. NHWs used the word pain more often to describe physically hurtful experiences (45.3% vs. 42.1%; χ 2 [1, N=309]=4.675, p 2 [1, N=309]=7.320, p 2 [1, N=309]=13.310, p

Chronic pain results in tremendous economic and psychological burden. Thus, an ability to identify individuals at risk for chronic pain onset could be an important first step in reducing this burden. One mechanism that may contribute to pain onset is impaired descending pain inhibition. The present study examined whether the efficiency of descending inhibition (as measured by conditioned pain modulation, CPM) predicted future chronic pain onset in a sample of participants who were healthy and pain-free at the time of enrollment in OK-SNAP. Chronic pain onset was determined prospectively from follow-up surveys administered every 6-months following enrollment. Of the 139 Native American (NA) and 147 non-Hispanic white (NHW) participants enrolled, 208 (73%) responded to ≥1 follow-up. Participants were said to have developed chronic pain if they experienced persistent pain for >3 months and the pain did not remit at subsequent follow-ups (N=34, 16%). 174 persons did not develop chronic pain. CPM was assessed from painful electric stimulations delivered before and during hand/forearm submersion in 10˚C water. Pain ratings and nociceptive flexion reflexes (NFR; correlate of spinal nociception) were assessed in response to electric stimuli. CPM efficiency = change in pain/NFR. CPM of pain and NFR were entered as predictors in a logistic regression that controlled for race (NA vs. NHW), age, BMI, sex, general health, depression, anxiety, and somatization. Interactions between race and CPM efficiency were examined as well. Results found less efficient CPM of NFR (OR=6.53, 95%CI: 1.04, 40.95) and more depressive symptoms (OR=10.22, 95%CI: 1.28, 81.36) at enrollment predicted chronic pain onset. The model explained 34.5% of the variance (Nagelkerke R2=.345). Interactions of CPM variables with race were not significant. These findings imply that impaired descending inhibition of spinal nociception (NFR) may play a role in the development of chronic pain.

Sex hormones may contribute to inter- and intra-individual differences in pain by influencing emotional modulation of pain and nociception. To study this, a well-validated picture-viewing paradigm was used to assess emotional modulation of pain and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR; physiologic measure of nociception) during mid-follicular, ovulatory, and late-luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy normally cycling women (n=40). Salivary estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone were assessed at each testing session. Emotional modulation of pain/NFR did not differ across menstrual phases, but low estradiol was associated with weaker emotional modulation of NFR (during all phases) and emotional modulation of pain (ovulatory and late-luteal phases). Given evidence that a failure to emotionally modulate pain might be a risk factor for chronic pain, low estradiol may promote chronic pain via this mechanism. However, future research is needed to extend these findings to women with disturbances of pain, emotion, and/or sex hormones.

Pain problems are more prevalent in Native Americans than in any other group in the U.S., and this might result from group differences in pain modulation. This study was designed to examine emotional modulation of pain and spinal nociception in healthy, pain-free Native Americans (n = 21) relative to non-Hispanic Whites (n = 20). To assess emotional modulation of pain and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR, a physiological measure of spinal nociception), participants underwent a well-validated emotional picture-viewing paradigm during which suprathreshold pain stimuli were delivered to the ankle. Compared to Whites, Native Americans reported less pleasure to erotic pictures and failed to show corrugator reactivity to mutilation pictures. Unlike Whites, Native Americans only evidenced pain inhibition in response to erotica, but no pain facilitation (disinhibition) to mutilation pictures. Emotional modulation of NFR was similar in both groups. These preliminary findings suggest that Native Americans failed to disinhibit pain, perhaps due to over-activation of pain inhibitory mechanisms. Chronic over-activation of this system could ultimately exhaust it, thus putting Native Americans at future risk for chronic pain.

Slow breathing is used as a means to reduce pain, yet the mechanisms responsible for respiration-induced hypoalgesia are poorly understood. The present study asked 30 healthy partici- pants (Mage = 21 years, Meducation = 15 years, 80% white non-Hispanic) to breathe at normal, slow (50% normal), and fast (125% normal) rates while constant-intensity, suprathreshold electric stimu- lations were delivered to the sural nerve to elicit pain and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR, a mea- sure of spinal nociception). Stimulations were equally balanced across inhalations and exhalations to determine whether parasympathetic activation during exhalations contributes to hypoalgesia. Respi- ration rate, heart rate variability (HRV, a measure of parasympathetic activity), heart rate, and subjec- tive arousal were assessed as manipulation checks. Slow breathing reduced pain relative to normal breathing and fast breathing, but NFR was not influenced by breathing. Further, pain and NFR did not differ between exhalations and inhalations, and changes in HRV did not correlate with changes in pain or NFR. Together, these findings suggest that respiration-induced hypoalgesia does not re- quire gating of spinal nociception or changes in parasympathetic activity. Perspective: Slow breathing reduced pain relative to normal and fast breathing. This respiration- induced hypoalgesia does not appear to be due to gating of spinal nociception or changes in para- sympathetic activity.

The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) is a physiological tool to study spinal nociception. However, NFR assessment can take several minutes and expose participants to repeated suprathreshold stimulations. The 4 studies reported here assessed the reliability and validity of a brief method to assess NFR threshold that uses a single ascending series of stimulations (Peak 1 NFR), by comparing it to a well-validated method that uses 3 ascending/descending staircases of stimulations (Staircase NFR). Correlations between the NFR definitions were high, were on par with test-retest correlations of Staircase NFR, and were not affected by participant sex or chronic pain status. Results also indicated the test-retest reliabilities for the 2 definitions were similar. Using larger stimulus increments (4 mAs) to assess Peak 1 NFR tended to result in higher NFR threshold estimates than using the Staircase NFR definition, whereas smaller stimulus increments (2 mAs) tended to result in lower NFR threshold estimates than the Staircase NFR definition. Neither NFR definition was correlated with anxiety, pain catastrophizing, or anxiety sensitivity. In sum, a single ascending series of electrical stimulations results in a reliable and valid estimate of NFR threshold. However, caution may be warranted when comparing NFR thresholds across studies that differ in the ascending stimulus increments. Perspective This brief method to assess NFR threshold is reliable and valid; therefore, it should be useful to clinical pain researchers interested in quickly assessing inter- and intra-individual differences in spinal nociceptive processes.

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic pain disorder associated with widespread musculoskeletal pain, tenderness, and fatigue. Additionally, correlational research suggests negative affect (eg, depression, anxiety) and deficits in positive affect may contribute to FMS symptomatology. However, well-controlled, experimental research is necessary to ascertain whether patients with FMS have problems in affective processing. The present study used a well-validated picture-viewing paradigm to evoke emotional responses in 17 patients with FMS and 17 sex- and age-matched healthy control participants. Each participant viewed pleasant (erotica), neutral, and unpleasant (attack related) pictures, and abrupt white noises were delivered during two-thirds of the pictures to evoke startle eyeblinks. Appetitive and defensive responding was assessed from subjective (valence/pleasure and arousal ratings) and physiological (corrugator EMG, heart rate, skin-conductance response, startle-reflex modulation) reactions to pictures. Results suggested FMS was associated with greater defensive activation (displeasure, subjective arousal, corrugator EMG) to the unpleasant, threat-related pictures, but not deficits in appetitive activation to erotic pictures. Although preliminary, these data suggest individuals with FMS have deficits in affective processing, but this dysregulation may be limited to defensive activation. Implications for treatment and future research are discussed. Perspective Fibromyalgia is a debilitating disease associated with affective distress. Results from the present study suggest that FMS is associated with enhanced defensive activation to nonpainful threat-related stimuli, but not deficits in appetitive reactions to erotic stimuli. These findings have implications for the treatment and study of FMS.

The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) is a polysynaptic withdrawal reflex typically assessed from biceps femoris electromyogram (EMG) following noxious stimulation of the ipsilateral sural nerve. Electrophysiological evidence suggests the reflex is elicited following the activation of small diameter A-delta afferents. As a result, the NFR is assumed to be a categorically distinct construct that emerges from EMG activity only following nociceptor activation. Despite the widespread use of the NFR in pain research, there has been little attempt to verify the latent structure of the NFR. The present study used "coherent cut kinetics" taxometric analyses to examine whether the latent structure of biceps femoris EMG reflects the taxonic structure that would be predicted from electrophysiological evidence. To achieve this end, preliminary analyses first compared different methods of scoring NFR magnitude. Results suggested the presence of a taxon in the covariance of biceps femoris EMG and stimulus intensity that is likely to be the NFR. Furthermore, preliminary analyses suggested the best method of scoring NFR magnitude was using Cohen's d. Implications of these results are discussed.

Emotionally charged facial expressions (happy, fear) served as conditioned stimuli in a differential fear conditioning procedure. Expressions were presented in pseudo-random order on a computer monitor. For half of the participants, the fear expression was paired with an aversive electric stimulation (UCS), whereas the happy expression was unpaired. The other participants had the opposite pairing. To assess the influence of conditioned fear on pain, expressions were shown again in the absence of the UCS and pain threshold was assessed during each expression. The latency of finger withdrawal from a radiant heat device was used to index pain threshold. Skin conductance response (SCR) and self-reported emotion were measured to assess fear conditioning. Consistent with preparedness theory, differential fear conditioning was only present when the fear expression was paired with the UCS. Moreover, pain threshold was only influenced by fear conditioning in persons for whom the fear expression was paired with the UCS. Specifically, finger withdrawal latencies were lower (suggesting hyperalgesia) during the fear expression than during the happy expression; an effect that was not present before CSUCS pairing. This work suggests that some stimuli are more readily associated with an aversive event and can lead to pain enhancement. Perspective: Although preliminary, these results suggest that fear-relevant environmental stimuli (including facial expressions) may provide important environmental cues during aversive events that influence the level of pain experienced.

Prior research has found that pain catastrophizing measured before pain testing is not correlated with the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold (a measure of spinal nociception), suggesting that catastrophizing does not alter pain through descending modulatory mechanisms. However, recent evidence suggests that in vivo catastrophizing (measured during or after pain testing) is a better predictor of pain outcomes. In the present study, NFR threshold and pain sensation ratings were assessed in 78 healthy participants by delivering electric stimulations to the sural nerve. After pain testing, participants were asked to rate their affective reaction (displeasure, arousal) to electric stimuli and to report on their pain catastrophizing. Hierarchical regression analyses controlling for participant sex, pre-experiment affect, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy were used to predict pain-related outcomes (NFR threshold, pain sensation, displeasure ratings, arousal ratings) from in vivo catastrophizing scores. Results indicated that in vivo catastrophizing was related to pain sensation but not to NFR thresholds or arousal reactions. The relation between in vivo catastrophizing and displeasure ratings was not significant after other variables were controlled. These data support prior research suggesting that catastrophizing does not alter pain by engaging descending modulatory mechanisms. Perspective Pain catastrophizing is an important psychological predictor of pain and pain-related functioning. The present study confirms prior reports suggesting that catastrophizing does not work by engaging mechanisms that alter pain transmission in the spinal cord before the signal travels to the brain.

Background: Research suggests that the influence of gender on the processing and experience of pain is a result of several mechanisms. One mediating variable is emotion, which may modulate pain through an interaction of valence (pleasant-unpleasant) and arousal (calm-excited). Objective: This review examines whether gender differences in the experience and processing of emotion contribute to differences in the modulation and perception of pain. Methods: An English-language search of MEDLINE and PsycINFO was conducted from 1887 to May 2005. Additional literature was obtained from reference lists of articles retained in the initial search. Results: Emotion appears to influence pain through a valence-by-arousal interaction. Specifically, negatively valenced emotions with low to moderate arousal (eg, anxiety) enhance pain, whereas negatively valenced emotions with high arousal (eg, fear) reduce pain. In contrast, positively valenced emotions always reduce pain, as long as minimal arousal is achieved. Some evidence suggests that women are more sensitive than men to threat-related stimuli and thus experience more negative affect than men. This would generally lead to enhanced pain perception in women. It is also possible that women are more likely than men to experience negative affect with high arousal (intense fear) and thus pain inhibition. However, the relatively lower base rate of intense negative emotions is not likely to contribute much to gender differences in pain. Evidence also suggests that men may be more sensitive to positive events, particularly sexual/erotic stimuli, which may lead to more positive emotion-induced pain reduction in men, relative to women. Conclusions: This review suggests that gender differences in the experience of pain may arisefrom differences in the experience and processing of emotion that, in turn, differentially alter pain processing. Specifically, the system associated with negative affect may be more attuned to threatening stimuli in women, and the system associated with positive affect may be more attuned to pleasurable stimuli in men. However, there is a paucity of research directly addressing this issue; much of the research on this topic has failed to test a comprehensive model of emotion, failed to use adequate manipulation checks, or failed to use within-subject experimental designs that control for intra- and interindividual differences. Therefore, it is concluded that additional research is warranted.

Prior research indicates that exposure to fear-inducing stimuli inhibits finger withdrawal to sudden onset and high intensity radiant heat in humans. Although withdrawal latencies to intense heat are thought to reflect changes in spinal nociceptive processing, supraspinal measures are needed to determine whether pain perception is altered. The present study used gradual onset and low intensity radiant heat to induce a finger withdrawal response that depends on supraspinal processes. After baseline pain threshold tests, 57 healthy human participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In the fear group, participants received 3 brief shocks. In the neutral group, participants did not receive shock. Results suggest that finger withdrawal latencies to low intensity heat were increased after shock presentation, providing additional evidence that fear reduces pain on a measure that is influenced by supraspinal processes. Both self-report and physiological (skin conductance level, heart rate, and blood pressure) measures of emotion confirmed that the intended affective states were induced. Finger temperature was unaffected by emotion manipulations; thus, skin cooling does not appear to mediate increased withdrawal latencies. These findings provide additional evidence that fear not only inhibits spinal nociceptive reflexes, it also inhibits supraspinal measures of pain. Perspective From a clinical perspective, these data suggest that patients who experience intense fear in response to unpredictable threatening events will show a reduction in pain perception.

Considerable animal research suggests that exposure to noxious and nonnoxious fear-inducing stimuli can produce hypoalgesia. Although this effect is thought to generalize across species, only a few studies have examined the pain modulatory effects of nonnoxious fear-eliciting stimuli in humans. The present study examined whether exposure to a series of loud noise bursts would produce a fear-related hypoalgesia in male and female human subjects. Both subjective and physiologic measures (skin conductance level, heart rate) indicated that noise exposure resulted in fear, sympathetic arousal, and decreased pain reactivity in women (n = 20). In contrast, men (n = 20) did not experience fear or physiologic arousal, but reacted with surprise and increased pain reactivity. These findings provide additional evidence that hypoalgesia is mediated by fear and physiologic arousal. Although future studies should directly manipulate surprise, it appears that surprise without fear and physiologic arousal might enhance pain processing.