1. Colorectal cancer, screening and survival: the influence of socio-economic deprivation
- Author
-
Emma Frew, David K. Whynes, C.M Manghan, John H. Scholefield, and Jack D. Hardcastle
- Subjects
Male ,Gerontology ,Colorectal cancer ,Social class ,Vulnerable Populations ,law.invention ,Life Expectancy ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Humans ,Mass Screening ,Poverty ,Survival analysis ,Aged ,Proportional Hazards Models ,business.industry ,Proportional hazards model ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Cancer ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Survival Analysis ,Clinical trial ,Treatment Outcome ,Databases as Topic ,England ,Social Class ,Socioeconomic Factors ,Life expectancy ,Female ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Family Practice ,business ,Demography - Abstract
Objectives . To determine the extent to which socio-economic deprivation explains colorectal cancer prevalence, subject participation in screening, and postoperative survival and life expectancy. Methods . Regression analyses of clinical data from a large randomized controlled trial, augmented by geographical-based indices of deprivation. Results . Deprivation appears to exert no significant impact on colorectal cancer prevalence but is a major factor explaining subject participation in screening. Cancer detection at later stages reduces life expectancy at time of treatment. Females from more-deprived areas have poorer post-treatment life expectancies and survival prospects, independently of their screening behaviour. Conclusions . Screening increases the chances of having a cancer treated at an earlier stage, and treatment at an earlier stage is associated with longer subsequent life expectancy. However, those from more-deprived areas are less likely to accept an invitation to be screened.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF