Search

Purpose Sources of funding and principal investigator (PI) leadership for clinical trials using radiation therapy (RT) are not well characterized but are important mediators of innovation, particularly because funding for trials from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has decreased and industry funding has increased. We sought to determine characteristics of trials using RT that are associated with industry funding, NIH funding, and radiation oncologist (RO) PI leadership. Methods and Materials www.ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for all open, interventional trials that administered RT. Logistic regression was used to identify associations between trial characteristics, receipt of funding type (NIH, industry, or other), and PI leadership. Results The authors identified 1469 oncology trials, of which 41% were based in the United States, 56% were based internationally, and 3% were based in the United States and internationally. Of these, 22% were RT monotherapy, 53% were bimodality (40% RT + drug, 13% RT + surgery), and 24% were trimodality. Although ROs led 60% of all trials, industry-sponsored trials were significantly less likely to have RO PIs (35% RO vs 65% non-RO PI; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.73), to fund trials that did not incorporate drug therapy (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10-0.35), or to fund phase III trials (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.60) because industry-sponsored trials favored smaller phase I trials. NIH-funded trials were not associated with PI type and, although not statistically significant, favored larger phase III trials (unadjusted OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.99-4.29). ROs were less likely to lead trials incorporating drug therapy (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.22-0.41). Conclusions ROs are less likely than other specialties to lead trials that use RT in combination with drug therapy or surgery and more likely to lead trials supported by nonindustry, non-NIH funding. This suggests a need for ROs to lead multimodality trials and to consider opportunities to interact with industry. As NIH resources decrease, alternative funding is needed to support innovation, particularly in in RT-alone trials.

Background Tri-modality therapy (TMT) is a recognized treatment strategy for selected patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Objective Report long-term outcomes of patients with MIBC treated by TMT. Design, setting, and participants Four hundred and seventy-five patients with cT2–T4a MIBC were enrolled on protocols or treated as per protocol at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 1986 and 2013. Intervention Patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Patients with less than a complete response (CR) to chemoradiation or with an invasive recurrence were recommended to undergo salvage radical cystectomy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results and limitations Median follow-up for surviving patients was 7.21 yr. Five- and 10-yr DSS rates were 66% and 59%, respectively. Five- and 10-yr OS rates were 57% and 39%, respectively. The risk of salvage cystectomy at 5 yr was 29%. In multivariate analyses, T2 disease (OS hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.75, DSS HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.36–0.73), CR to chemoradiation (OS HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46–0.81, DSS HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.34–0.71), and presence of tumor-associated carcinoma in situ (OS HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.17–2.08, DSS HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03–2.17) were significant predictors for OS and DSS. When evaluating our cohort over treatment eras, rates of CR improved from 66% to 88% and 5-yr DSS improved from 60% to 84% during the eras of 1986–1995 to 2005–2013, while the 5-yr risk of salvage radical cystectomy rate decreased from 42% to 16%. Conclusions These data demonstrate high rates of CR and bladder preservation in patients receiving TMT, and confirm DSS rates similar to modern cystectomy series. Contemporary results are particularly encouraging, and therefore TMT should be discussed and offered as a treatment option for selected patients. Patient summary Tri-modality therapy is an alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and is associated with comparable long-term survival and high rates of bladder preservation.

Summary This study identified molecular differences between cisplatin-resistant and parental H460 lung cancer cells by using microarray expressionanalysis.Cisplatinresistant cells illustrated more rapidinvivotumorgrowthand greater survival following treatment with cisplatin or radiation than parental H460 cells. Cisplatin-resistant cells also demonstrated decreased expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein3 and increased IGF-1R signaling. Cisplatin resistance was reversed by treating cisplatin-resistant cells with human recombinant IGF binding protein-3. siRNA Purpose: The development of drug-resistant phenotypes has been a major obstacle to cisplatin use in nonesmall-cell lung cancer. We aimed to identify some of the molecular mechanisms that underlie cisplatin resistance using microarray expression analysis. Methods and Materials: H460 cells were treated with cisplatin. The differences between cisplatin-resistant lung cancer cells and parental H460 cells were studied using Western blot, MTS, and clonogenic assays, in vivo tumor implantation, and microarray analysis. The cisplatin-R cells were treated with human recombinant insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-3 and siRNA targeting IGF-1 receptor. Results: Cisplatin-R cells illustrated greater expression of the markers CD133 and aldehyde dehydrogenase, more rapid in vivo tumor growth, more resistance to cisplatin- and etoposideinduced apoptosis, and greater survival after treatment with cisplatin or radiation than the parental H460 cells. Also, cisplatin-R demonstrated decreased expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and increased activation of IGF-1 receptor signaling compared with parental H460 cells in the presence of IGF-1. Human recombinant IGF binding protein-3 reversed cisplatin resistance in cisplatin-R cells and targeting of IGF-1 receptor using siRNA resulted in sensitization of cisplatin-R-cells to cisplatin and radiation. Conclusions: The IGF-1 signaling pathway contributes to cisplatin-R to cisplatin and radiation. Thus, this pathway represents a potential target for improved lung cancer response to treatment. 2012 Elsevier Inc.

Purpose To determine whether MLN8054, an Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A) inhibitor causes radiosensitization in androgen-insensitive prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo . Methods and Materials In vitro studies consisted of culturing PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells and then immunoblotting Aurora A and phospho-Aurora A after radiation and/or nocodazole with MLN8054. Phases of the cell cycle were measured with flow cytometry. PC3 and DU145 cell lines were measured for survival after treatment with MLN8054 and radiation. Immunofluorescence measured γ-H2AX in the PC3 and DU145 cells after treatment. In vivo studies looked at growth delay of PC3 tumor cells in athymic nude mice. PC3 cells grew for 6 to 8 days in mice treated with radiation, MLN8054, or combined for 7 more days. Tumors were resected and fixed on paraffin and stained for von Willebrand factor, Ki67, and caspase-3. Results In vitro inhibition of Aurora-A by MLN8054 sensitized prostate cancer cells, as determined by dose enhancement ratios in clonogenic assays. These effects were associated with sustained DNA double-strand breaks, as evidenced by increased immunofluorescence for γ-H2AX and significant G2/M accumulation and polyploidy. In vivo , the addition of MLN8054 (30 mg/kg/day) to radiation in mouse prostate cancer xenografts (PC3 cells) significantly increased tumor growth delay and apoptosis (caspase-3 staining), with reduction in cell proliferation (Ki67 staining) and vascular density (von Willebrand factor staining). Conclusion MLN8054, a novel small molecule Aurora-A inhibitor showed radiation sensitization in androgen-insensitive prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo . This warrants the clinical development of MLN8054 with radiation for prostate cancer patients.

Introduction: Survivin, an inhibitor of apoptosis protein and key regulator of mitosis, is up-regulated in a variety of cancers and is often associated with a worse prognosis. Terameprocol down-regulates the Sp1-mediated transcription of survivin and Cdk1, which is important for cell cycle progression and many other proteins. Survivin inhibition has previously been shown to result in the induction of apoptosis and radiosensitization. Methods: This study examined the effects of terameprocol administration on survivin transcription and expression in HCC2429 and H460 lung cancer cells. We also examined the combined effects of radiation and terameprocol on apoptosis and radiosensitivity. Results: Using immunoblot analysis and luciferase assays, we confirmed that terameprocol decreases survivin transcription and protein expression. Ultimately, however, decreases in survivin expression failed to correlate with an increase in apoptosis. Nonetheless, clonogenic assay revealed that terameprocol induces increased radiosensitization in HCC2429 (dose enhancement ratio=1.26, p = 0.019) and H460 (dose enhancement ratio=1.18, p = 0.001) cells. Additionally, the data show no effect of terameprocol on cell cycle in either HCC2429 or H460 cells. Conclusions: Terameprocol significantly enhances the sensitivity of non-small cell lung carcinoma cell lines to radiation therapy, although the mechanism of action remains unclear. Further study is warranted to assess the potential of terameprocol as an agent that may enhance the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy in lung cancer.

The authors regret that the following errors occurred in the above article: The 5th and 6th authors and their affiliation were mistakenly omitted. Section 2.2, p. 6010, 1st paragraph: Mpex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. should be changed to Vaxiion Therapeutics, Inc. Table 1, p. 6010: Mpex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. should be changed to Vaxiion Therapeutics, Inc. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.