1. Variability of anti‐PF4/heparin antibody results obtained by the rapid testing system ID‐H/PF4‐PaGIA
- Author
-
Irmela Sulzer, Lorenzo Alberio, Giuseppe Colucci, S. Schneiter, Bernhard Lämmle, and Gabriela Barizzi
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Platelet Aggregation ,Platelet Function Tests ,Centrifugation ,Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ,Platelet Factor 4 ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ,Gastroenterology ,Specimen Handling ,Antigen-Antibody Reactions ,Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia ,Internal medicine ,Freezing ,medicine ,Humans ,Immunosorbent Techniques ,Autoantibodies ,Rapid testing ,Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic ,Reproducibility ,Heparin ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Reproducibility of Results ,Hematology ,medicine.disease ,Microspheres ,Pre- and post-test probability ,Early Diagnosis ,Heparin antibody ,Immunology ,Polystyrenes ,Artifacts ,business ,Gels ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Summary. Background: Recent studies have shown that a low clinical pretest probability may be adequate for excluding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, for patients with intermediate or high pretest probability, laboratory testing is essential for confirming or refuting the diagnosis. Rapid assessment of anti-PF4/heparin-antibodies may assist clinical decision-making. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of rapid ID-H/PF4-PaGIA. In particular, we verified reproducibility of results between plasma and serum specimens, between fresh and frozen samples, and between different ID-H/PF4-polymer lots (polystyrene beads coated with heparin/PF4-complexes). Patients/Methods: The samples studied were 1376 plasma and 914 corresponding serum samples from patients investigated for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia between January 2000 and October 2008. Anti-PF4/heparin-antibodies were assessed by ID-H/PF4-PaGIA, commercially available ELISAs and heparin-induced platelet aggregation test. Results: Among 914 paired plasma/serum samples we noted discordant results (negative vs. low-titre positive) in nine instances (1%; 95%CI, 0.4–1.6%). Overall, agreement between titres assessed in plasma vs. serum was highly significant (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.975; P
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF