1. Protective effect of a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine in pigs
- Author
-
David Solanes Foz, Jens Nielsen, Marie Borggren, Ramona Trebbien, Enric Vidal, James A. Williams, Ayub Darji, Maiken Worsøe Rosenstierne, Ingrid Karlsson, Júlia Vergara-Alert, Anders Fomsgaard, Joaquim Segalés, Marta Sisteré-Oró, Producció Animal, and Sanitat Animal
- Subjects
Male ,DNA vaccine ,0301 basic medicine ,Cellular immunity ,Swine ,Immunology ,Hemagglutinin (influenza) ,Influenza A virus/immunology ,Biology ,medicine.disease_cause ,Article ,DNA vaccination ,Microbiology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype ,Orthomyxoviridae Infections ,Swine Diseases/immunology ,Vaccines, DNA ,Influenza A virus ,medicine ,Animals ,Challenge ,Neutralizing antibody ,Needle-free immunization ,Swine Diseases ,Protection ,Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology ,General Veterinary ,H1N1pdm09 ,Immunogenicity ,Vaccines, DNA/immunology ,Influenza Vaccines/immunology ,619 - Veterinària ,Swine influenza ,Virology ,3. Good health ,030104 developmental biology ,Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology ,Influenza Vaccines ,Naked DNA ,biology.protein ,Neuraminidase - Abstract
Background: Influenza A virus in swine herds represents a major problem for the swine industry and poses a constant threat for the emergence of novel pandemic viruses and the development of more effective influenza vaccines for pigs is desired. By optimizing the vector backbone and using a needle-free delivery method, we have recently demonstrated a polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine that induces a broad immune response, including both humoral and cellular immunity. Objectives: To investigate the protection of our polyvalent influenza DNA vaccine approach in a pig challenge study. Methods: By intradermal needle-free delivery to the skin, we immunized pigs with two different doses (500 μg and 800 μg) of an influenza DNA vaccine based on six genes of pandemic origin, including internally expressed matrix and nucleoprotein and externally expressed hemagglutinin and neuraminidase as previously demonstrated. Two weeks following immunization, the pigs were challenged with the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus. Results: When challenged with 2009 pandemic H1N1, 0/5 vaccinated pigs (800 μg DNA) became infected whereas 5/5 unvaccinated control pigs were infected. The pigs vaccinated with the low dose (500 μg DNA) were only partially protected. The DNA vaccine elicited binding-, hemagglutination inhibitory (HI) − as well as crossreactive neutralizing antibody activity and neuraminidase inhibiting antibodies in the immunized pigs, in a dosedependent manner. Conclusion: The present data, together with the previously demonstrated immunogenicity of our influenza DNA vaccine, indicate that naked DNA vaccine technology provides a strong approach for the development of improved pig vaccines, applying realistic low doses of DNA and a convenient delivery method for mass vaccination. info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF