1. Detection and Early Referral of Patients With Interstitial Lung Abnormalities
- Author
-
Gary M. Hunninghake, Jonathan G. Goldin, Michael A. Kadoch, Jonathan A. Kropski, Ivan O. Rosas, Athol U. Wells, Ruchi Yadav, Howard M. Lazarus, Fereidoun G. Abtin, Tamera J. Corte, Joao A. de Andrade, Kerri A. Johannson, Martin R. Kolb, David A. Lynch, Justin M. Oldham, Paolo Spagnolo, Mary E. Strek, Sara Tomassetti, George R. Washko, Eric S. White, Fereidoun Abtin, Katerina Antoniou, Timothy Blackwell, Kevin Brown, Jonathan Chung, Tamera Corte, Bruno Crestani, Peter Crossno, Daniel Culver, Joao de Andrade, Anand Deveraj, Kevin Flaherty, Gunnar Gudmundsson, Hiroto Hatabu, Joe Jacob, Kerri Johansson, Jeff Kanne, Ella Kazerooni, Martin Kolb, David Lynch, Toby Maher, Fernando Martinez, Antonio Morais, Steven D. Nathan, Imre Noth, Justin Oldham, Anna Podolanczuk, Venerino Poletti, Claudia Ravaglia, Elizabetta Renzoni, Luca Richeldi, Geoffrey Rubin, Chris Ryerson, Debasis Sahoo, Rob Suh, Nicola Sverzellati, Dominique Valeyre, Simon Walsh, and George Washko
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Referral ,business.industry ,Interstitial lung disease ,Pulmonologist ,respiratory system ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,medicine.disease ,respiratory tract diseases ,Pulmonary function testing ,FEV1/FVC ratio ,medicine ,Honeycombing ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Intensive care medicine ,business ,Pulmonologists ,Lung cancer screening - Abstract
Background Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) may represent undiagnosed early-stage or subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILAs are often observed incidentally in patients who subsequently develop clinically overt ILD. There is limited information on consensus definitions for, and the appropriate evaluation of, ILA. Early recognition of patients with ILD remains challenging, yet critically important. Expert consensus could inform early recognition and referral. Research Question Can consensus-based expert recommendations be identified to guide clinicians in the recognition, referral, and follow-up of patients with or at risk of developing early ILDs? Study Design and Methods Pulmonologists and radiologists with expertise in ILD participated in two iterative rounds of surveys. The surveys aimed to establish consensus regarding ILA reporting, identification of patients with ILA, and identification of populations that might benefit from screening for ILD. Recommended referral criteria and follow-up processes were also addressed. Threshold for consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement. Results Fifty-five experts were invited and 44 participated; consensus was reached on 39 of 85 questions. The following clinically important statements achieved consensus: honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis indicate potentially progressive ILD; honeycombing detected during lung cancer screening should be reported as potentially significant (eg, with the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System “S-modifier” [which indicates clinically significant or potentially significant noncancer findings]), recommending referral to a pulmonologist in the radiology report; high-resolution CT imaging and full pulmonary function tests should be ordered if nondependent subpleural reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, centrilobular ground-glass nodules, or patchy ground-glass opacity are observed on CT imaging; patients with honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis should be referred to a pulmonologist irrespective of FVC and diffusion capacity values; and patients with systemic sclerosis should be screened with pulmonary function tests for early-stage ILD. Interpretation Guidance for identifying clinically relevant ILA, with subsequent referral and follow-up, was established. These results lay the foundation for developing practical guidance on managing patients with ILA.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF