Search

Monoclonal antibodies to somatostatin receptors 2A (SSTR2A, UMB-1) and 5 (SSTR5, UMB-4) were reported to be highly reliable for immunohistochemical detection of these receptors in neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the standardization of either the immunohistochemical procedure and the methods of evaluation has yet to be established. Fifty-two tissues from 38 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm were retrieved from 2 institutions in Italy and Japan. The tissues were immunostained using 3 staining methodologies: 1 automated and 2 manual protocols from the Italian and Japanese institutions. The slides were independently evaluated by 3 observers (2 experienced pathologists and 1 medical student) using 3 scoring systems (Volante-Score, HER2-Score, and H-Score). The scores obtained from the staining methods were highly correlated with each other (r0.85, P.0001). Especially, the Volante- and HER2-Scores were highly concordant (r≥0.95, P≤.0001). Very high interobserver agreement was obtained irrespective of the method used and the experience of the evaluator, with the best concordance obtained by experienced pathologists evaluating automated system-stained slides (SSTR2A, r0.97; SSTR5, r0.96). HER2- and H-Scores were reliable to represent the characteristics of the patients. SSTR2A expression evaluated by the HER2-Score was significantly associated with clinical efficacy to somatostatin analogs (P=.04). SSTRs determination is an easily standardizable tool in different laboratories and is highly reproducible irrespective of the method of evaluation used. Given the positive association with clinical efficacy to somatostatin analogs, as well as the simple and widespread use, HER2-Score can be proposed as a standard evaluation procedure of SSTR2A and SSTR5 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer and initially induces tumor regression, but invariably results in castration-resistant prostate cancer through various mechanisms, incompletely discovered. Our aim was to analyze the dynamic modulation, determined by ADT, of the expression of selected genes involved in the pathogenesis and progression of prostate cancer (TMPRSS2:ERG, WNT11, SPINK1, CHGA, AR, and SPDEF) using real-time polymerase chain reaction in a series of 59 surgical samples of prostate carcinomas, including 37 cases preoperatively treated with ADT and 22 untreated cases, and in 43 corresponding biopsies. The same genes were analyzed in androgen-deprived and control LNCaP cells. Three genes were significantly up-modulated (WNT11 and AR) or down-modulated (SPDEF) in patients treated with ADT versus untreated cases, as well as in androgen-deprived LNCaP cells. The effect of ADT on CHGA gene up-modulation was almost exclusively detected in cases positive for the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion. The correlation between biopsy and surgical samples was poor for most of the tested genes. Gene expression analysis of separate tumor areas from the same patient showed an extremely heterogeneous profile in the 6 tested cases (all untreated). In conclusion, our results strengthened the implication of ADT in promoting a prostate cancer aggressive phenotype and identified potential biomarkers, with special reference to the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion, which might favor the development of neuroendocrine differentiation in hormone-treated patients. However, intratumoral heterogeneity limits the use of gene expression analysis as a potential prognostic or predictive biomarker in patients treated with ADT.

Introduction The vast majority of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) presents as advanced disease, and histological diagnosis is widely based on small samples. The differential activity and toxicity profile of new cytotoxic and molecular-targeted therapies according to histotypes requires a precise subtyping of NSCLC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) contributes to define the most probable histotype; however, the real impact of IHC characterization of NSCLC-not otherwise specified (NOS) in terms of outcome is not well established. Methods A large series of 224 advanced "nonsquamous" NSCLC diagnosed on small biopsy or cytological samples and homogeneously treated was retrospectively selected, all having adequate follow-up data available. Reviewed diagnoses resulted into two groups: adenocarcinoma (ADC) and NSCLC-NOS. The latter was further characterized by IHC (TTF-1, Napsin-A, p40, and Desmocollin-3) –identify a possible, most probable differentiation lineage. Results Sixty-seven percentage of cases were classified as ADC based on morphological examination only ("morphological ADC") and 33% as NSCLC-NOS. IHC profiling of NSCLC-NOS identified 43.2% of cases with an ADC immunophenotype ("NSCLC favor ADC"), 10.8% with a phenotype favoring squamous lineage, and 46% lacking differentiation features. Survival curves confirmed no difference in terms of outcome between the morphological ADC and the NSCLC favor ADC groups, while a significantly poorer outcome was found in the "null" group in terms of best response, progression-free survival or overall survival (OS). Conclusion Tumors with an IHC profile ADC-like had an OS comparable with that of morphological ADCs. These findings support the use of IHC to optimize lung cancer histological typing and therapy.

Typing somatostatin receptor expression in neuroendocrine tumors is of relevance to target somatostatin analogue-based diagnostic approach and treatment. The expanding use of immunohistochemistry to detect somatostatin receptors is to date not paralleled by an accurate methodological setting and standardized interpretation of the results. A multicentric study was designed to compare somatostatin receptor immunohistochemical expression with in vivo scintigraphic data and verify its usefulness in the clinical management of neuroendocrine tumors. After methodological setting by testing different somatostatin receptor antibodies, 107 cases of neuroendocrine tumors with available somatostatin receptor scintigraphy data and pathological material were retrospectively analyzed for somatostatin receptor types 2A, 3 and 5 immunohistochemical expression, and compared with scintigraphic images and, whenever available, with the clinical response to somatostatin analogue treatment. Restricting 'positive cases' to the presence of a membrane pattern of staining, an overall somatostatin receptor type 2A immunohistochemistry/somatostatin receptor scintigraphy agreement of 77% (chi2 test P