Search

Few studies investigate the influence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, we compared complications and readmissions frequencies after TKA in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) to patients without IBD.A large administrative claims database was used to identify patients who underwent primary TKAs from 2010 to 2019 and had a diagnosis of IBD before TKA. Patients were stratified into two groups: those with CD (n = 8,369) and those with UC (n = 11,347). These patients were compared a control of 1.3 million patients without an IBD diagnosis. Chi-square and unadjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare complication frequencies. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate independent risk factors for 90-day complications.Compared to patients without IBD, patients with IBD were associated with higher unadjusted 90-day odds for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (CD: OR 2.81 [95% CI 2.17 to 3.63]; p 0.001; UC: OR 3.01 [95% CI 2.43 to 3.72]; p 0.001) and two-year periprosthetic joint infection (CD: OR 1.34 [95% CI 1.18 to 1.52]; p 0.001; UC: OR 1.26 [95% CI 1.13 to 1.41]; p 0.001). After controlling for risk factors like obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes, both types of IBD were associated with higher 90-day odds for CDI and PJI (p 0.001 for all).IBD is associated with higher 90-day postoperative CDI and PJI compared with patients without IBD. Providers should consider discussing these risks with patients who have a diagnosis of IBD.

To determine the effectiveness of simulator training on basic arthroscopic skills utilizing a novel, low-cost arthroscopic triangulation training system.A randomized controlled trial of subjects without prior arthroscopy training was conducted, with participants randomized to receive either a fixed protocol of simulation training on a triangulation simulation model (30 minutes of training for 4 consecutive days), or no training. On Days 1 and 5, all participants were evaluated on 3 simulated arthroscopic tasks by an independent observer. Variables analyzed included how many times portals were changed, the time it took to complete the tasks, and the task completion rate.Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL.Thirty-six participants (92% male, average 28 ± 5 years) with no prior arthroscopy training were randomized into 2 groups, with 17 in the training group (T) and 19 in the no-training group (NT).On Day 1, there was no difference in rate of task completion between the T group and NT groups (41% versus 53%, p = 0.52). On Day 5, significantly more participants in the T group completed all tasks compared to the NT group (100% versus 63%, p = 0.008). Participants in the T group had significantly improved task completion times on Day 5 versus Day 1 (p0.05). Participants in the NT group had a significantly improved task completion time for Task 1 on Day 5 versus Day 1 (p = 0.037); no differences were found for Tasks 2 or 3. On Day 5, participants in the T group required significantly fewer portal changes compared to the NT group (2.35 ± 2.29 versus 6.95 ± 8.55, p = 0.039).Simulation training on a simple, low-cost arthroscopic triangulation training system resulted in an overall improvement in arthroscopic probing and triangulation skills within 1 week of training, with significantly decreased task completion times and increased efficiency of movement.

Purpose To compare outcomes of hip arthroplasty in patients with and without a history of hip arthroscopy through a systematic review. Methods A comprehensive search of the PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Central databases was performed using combinations of the keywords “hip,” “arthroscopy,” “arthroscopic,” “arthroplasty,” “replacement,” and “conversion” in December 2017. Level I through III studies directly comparing outcomes of total or resurfacing hip arthroplasty between patients with and without a history of hip arthroscopy were included in this review if they reported at least 1 outcome measure. Results Seven retrospective case-control studies collectively evaluating arthroplasty outcomes of 235 patients (104 male and 131 female patients) with a history of hip arthroscopy and 374 matched controls met the inclusion criteria. The mean age in the arthroscopy and control groups was 47.2 years and 49.1 years, respectively. The mean follow-up period after arthroplasty was 3.2 years in the hip arthroscopy group and 3.3 years in the control group. The mean time between arthroscopy and arthroplasty was 1.8 years. A posterior approach was used in 83.6% of arthroplasties. No statistically significant differences were noted in intraoperative measures, postoperative complications, or revision rates, with the exception of 1 study that reported an increased operative time among controls. Most studies reported similar subjective outcomes between groups, with a single study noting worse postoperative findings for the Harris Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score-12, visual analog scale pain score, and patient satisfaction in the prior hip arthroscopy group. Conclusions The current literature suggests that short-term and midterm outcomes of hip arthroplasty are comparable in patients with and without a history of hip arthroscopy. However, the available literature is limited given the small sample sizes and therefore greater potential for β error. Nevertheless, our findings may be useful for surgeons evaluating risks and prognoses in this patient population. Level of Evidence Level III, systematic review of Level III studies.