Search

Giant clams have been over-exploited throughout their wide geographical range in the Indo-Pacific. Marine reserves could be one tool to potentially safeguard broodstock, but their effect on giant clam abundance and the differential benefits of lagoon reserves compared to barrier reef reserves is still unclear. We assessed abundances of four species of giant clams across 20 barrier reef and 30 lagoon reef sites across 600 km of coastline in New Caledonia using stratified underwater visual censuses. Tridacna maxima was the most common species. T. derasa was significantly more abundant in marine reserves than at sites open to fishing, but there was no effect of marine reserves on total abundance pooled across the four species. T. squamosa was significantly more abundant on barrier reefs, while Hippopus hippopus was found solely on lagoon reefs. National data from fisher logbooks shows a marked reduction in commercial catches of giant clam following implementation of daily catch limits of 5 giant clams per vessel per trip. Despite small daily bag limits of 2 giant clams per recreational fisher per trip, the recreational catch appears to be significant and much greater than the commercial catch. The utility of marine reserves on giant clams appears to be species specific, and might be diminished for the group as a whole by the concomitant protection of their natural predators. Both lagoon and barrier reef sites should be included in reserve networks. Our data suggest that daily boat/trip limits are an effective output control, at least for commercial fishers, but might not safeguard giant clams if recreational fishers are numerous. Further fishery restrictions on the less common species might be needed to ensure their persistence in the Indo-Pacific.