Search

Study objective The benefit of epinephrine in cardiac arrest is controversial and has not been conclusively shown in any human clinical study. We seek to assess the effect of introducing intravenous epinephrine on the survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in an emergency medical services (EMS) system that previously did not use intravenous medications. Methods This observational, prospective, before-after clinical study constitutes phase II of the Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Epidemiology project. Included were all patients who are older than 8 years, with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest conveyed by the national emergency ambulance service. The comparison between the 2 intervention groups for survival to discharge was made with logistic regression and expressed in terms of the odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results From October 1, 2002, to October 14, 2004, 1,296 patients were enrolled into the study, with 615 in the pre-epinephrine and 681 in the epinephrine phase. Demographic and EMS characteristics were similar in both groups. Forty-four percent of patients received intravenous epinephrine in the epinephrine phase. There was no significant difference in survival to discharge (pre-epinephrine 1.0%; epinephrine 1.6%; OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.6 to 4.5]; adjusted for rhythm OR 2.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 5.5]); return of circulation (pre-epinephrine 17.9%; epinephrine 15.7%; OR 0.9 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.2]), or survival to admission (pre-epinephrine 7.5%; epinephrine 7.5%; OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.7 to 1.5]). There was a minimal increase in scene time in the epinephrine phase (10.3 minutes versus 10.7 minutes; 95% CI of difference 0.02 to 0.94 minutes). Conclusion We were unable to establish a significant survival benefit with the introduction of intravenous epinephrine to an EMS system. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of drugs such as epinephrine in resuscitation.

In Singapore, all public emergency ambulances are equipped with semi-automatic external defibrillators and the crew is trained in their use. This is the first paper from Singapore reporting the survival rate in patients presenting to an urban public hospital with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who developed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). All consecutive patients who presented to the ED of a public hospital with OHCA or ACS were surveyed from 1 April 1999 to 30 September 1999. There were 392 patients among whom 115 (28.5%) had OHCA. There was no significant difference in age and gender distribution between the OHCA and non-OHCA patients. More than 2/3 of the OHCA patients had no report of chest pain or breathlessness before they collapsed. Forty five (39.1%) of the 115 OHCA patients were noted to have initial rhythms of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and received pre-hospital defibrillation. The mean time from collapse to first DC shock was 12.07±7.2 min. Twenty (17.4%) of the OHCA patients had return of spontaneous circulation after resuscitation in the ED. Four patients (3.5%), all with an initial rhythm of VF were discharged alive from the hospital. Much remains to be done to reduce the time interval to first DC shock for the OHCA group.